Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum > Tech Talk
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-01-2011, 11:41 PM   #361
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire View Post
If the government overturns this decision, am I right to assume that this doesn't affect the caps that Shaw can use but only affects the caps they have on the other ISPs like TekSavvy?
Not necessarily. And even if that is the case, Shaw would be under a lot of pressure to drop their caps anyways.
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 12:05 AM   #362
Tinordi
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Exp:
Default

Interesting how this just may have completely backfired on the telcos. Public attention to internet policy and regulation has never been more intensive and insightful. This could be the new beginning of more discerned and engaged regulation of the 'market.'
Tinordi is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Tinordi For This Useful Post:
Old 02-02-2011, 07:18 AM   #363
WilsonFourTwo
First Line Centre
 
WilsonFourTwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Calgary.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC View Post
As you've said yourself many times, Shaw is only iterested in maximizing shareholder value.

It's the CRTC/govenernment who should be protecting consumer rights and competition.
Well, the Government is stepping into the debate.

http://www.canada.com/technology/Cle...219/story.html

Good on Harper (and by order, Clement) to at least get involved, look at the facts, and set policy.

The only thing left to do is (finally) get rid of the CRTC.
WilsonFourTwo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to WilsonFourTwo For This Useful Post:
Old 02-02-2011, 08:16 AM   #364
Jimmy Stang
Franchise Player
 
Jimmy Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire View Post
If the government overturns this decision, am I right to assume that this doesn't affect the caps that Shaw can use but only affects the caps they have on the other ISPs like TekSavvy?
I would imagine that it would relate exclusively to the wholesale rates to independent ISPs. But, I can't imagine Shaw pulling a stunt like this if the CRTC hadn't effectively killed the small competition.

Shaw should be free to set their own rates and consumers should be free to shop around. Shaw/Bell/Rogers shouldn't be able to set the rates of competitors beyond the actual cost plus a realistic wholesale markup.

When/if the CRTC decision is revered and Teksavvy can be competitive again, I'd put money on these caps quietly disappearing from Shaw's service. Or at least the monetary enforcement of them.
Jimmy Stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 08:44 AM   #365
secol
Powerplay Quarterback
 
secol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Exp:
Default

weird i've torrented quite a bit more than past months as well as doing my regular surfing/gaming/streaming but my meter for january is at a ridiculously low 4 GB total
secol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 11:53 AM   #366
Burninator
Franchise Player
 
Burninator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Exp:
Default

Sweet zombie Jesus.

Last month I totaled 220GB and half way through this month I am at 140GB. My cap is 60GB...

That seems insanely high. I think I should change the password on my wireless just to be on the safe side.
Burninator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 12:49 PM   #367
Rathji
Franchise Player
 
Rathji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Supporting Urban Sprawl
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Burninator View Post
Sweet zombie Jesus.

Last month I totaled 220GB and half way through this month I am at 140GB. My cap is 60GB...

That seems insanely high. I think I should change the password on my wireless just to be on the safe side.
Should also upgrade to Extreme at the very least.

edit: Once you are sure the traffic is yours, that it.
__________________
"Wake up, Luigi! The only time plumbers sleep on the job is when we're working by the hour."
Rathji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 12:58 PM   #368
Burninator
Franchise Player
 
Burninator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rathji View Post
Should also upgrade to Extreme at the very least.

edit: Once you are sure the traffic is yours, that it.
I'll take it easy for the next month and I should be okay. I think it's my online backup that is killing me. Plus I've downloaded a bunch on Xbox, some iTunes HD TV shows and some torrents. I've really been punishing my internets.
Burninator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 12:59 PM   #369
Mtt48
Scoring Winger
 
Mtt48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I just checked my usage. I download 1080p rips all the time and it says I'm around 200gb for the previous 3 time periods. I find the 200gb low actually.
Mtt48 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 01:01 PM   #370
Burninator
Franchise Player
 
Burninator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Exp:
Default

I recall people in this thread saying Telus internet is unlimited. I talked to two people at Telus and they said Optik high speed's cap is 125GB and the turbo is 250GB. I got mixed answers on what happens if you go over. One said nothing for now, but the cap will probably be enforced in the future. The other said they would send a warning letter and if you go over again they would charge $2 for every GB over.
Burninator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 01:02 PM   #371
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Their website lists those caps and have the $2/GB over on their website to currently.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to photon For This Useful Post:
Old 02-02-2011, 01:11 PM   #372
Jimmy Stang
Franchise Player
 
Jimmy Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Burninator View Post
I recall people in this thread saying Telus internet is unlimited. I talked to two people at Telus and they said Optik high speed's cap is 125GB and the turbo is 250GB. I got mixed answers on what happens if you go over. One said nothing for now, but the cap will probably be enforced in the future. The other said they would send a warning letter and if you go over again they would charge $2 for every GB over.
I have heard mixed things also. A friend of mine called today and he was told that the cap will likely be enforced sooner rather than later.

Obviously, the CRTC decision is setting the precedent that the large ISPs were hoping for. Why wouldn't they all follow suit? Afterall, the federal regulator has given them its blessing.

Personally, I think that Telus is stalling so they can appear as the reasonable choice in the midst of the public scrutiny. If independent ISPs are allowed to compete again, the caps will remain unenforced execpt in extreme situations. If the CRTC decision is upheld, they'll join their oligopoly counterparts and get their slice of the overage pie.
Jimmy Stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 02:03 PM   #373
Buff
Franchise Player
 
Buff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: I don't belong here
Exp:
Default

I just checked my usage. I'm using around 9GB/month. My plan includes 100GB. I think I should charge them for services not rendered.
Buff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 02:10 PM   #374
Jimmy Stang
Franchise Player
 
Jimmy Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buff View Post
I just checked my usage. I'm using around 9GB/month. My plan includes 100GB. I think I should charge them for services not rendered.
True usage based billing would benefit you. A low, fixed monthly cost for access, and then billed by the megabyte. Not unlike other utilities. Unfortunately, UBB as the big ISPs define it is a high, fixed monthly fee with disproportionate and punitive overages. If you use less, tough. But if you go over, you're going to feel it.
Jimmy Stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 02:21 PM   #375
Buff
Franchise Player
 
Buff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: I don't belong here
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy Stang View Post
True usage based billing would benefit you. A low, fixed monthly cost for access, and then billed by the megabyte. Not unlike other utilities. Unfortunately, UBB as the big ISPs define it is a high, fixed monthly fee with disproportionate and punitive overages. If you use less, tough. But if you go over, you're going to feel it.
Fortunately for me the money doesn't come out of my pocket. My internet is paid for by my employer. There was a time when I would have used so much more but by the time I'm on my computer I'm just too tired to do anything other than quickly read email and calgarypuck.
Buff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 02:24 PM   #376
Flaming Choy
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Flaming Choy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy Stang View Post
I have heard mixed things also. A friend of mine called today and he was told that the cap will likely be enforced sooner rather than later.

Obviously, the CRTC decision is setting the precedent that the large ISPs were hoping for. Why wouldn't they all follow suit? Afterall, the federal regulator has given them its blessing.

Personally, I think that Telus is stalling so they can appear as the reasonable choice in the midst of the public scrutiny. If independent ISPs are allowed to compete again, the caps will remain unenforced execpt in extreme situations. If the CRTC decision is upheld, they'll join their oligopoly counterparts and get their slice of the overage pie.
I heard that if you have Optic TV + their internet there is no limit since the TV signal comes in like an internet feed (IPTV or something?) and they can't tell you to not watch tv.
Flaming Choy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 02:39 PM   #377
Torture
Loves Teh Chat!
 
Torture's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

Lucky for us that this is happening as election winds are blowing.
Torture is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 02:56 PM   #378
Burninator
Franchise Player
 
Burninator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flaming Choy View Post
I heard that if you have Optic TV + their internet there is no limit since the TV signal comes in like an internet feed (IPTV or something?) and they can't tell you to not watch tv.
That's not true. I talked to Telus today (2 different people and apparently it's on their website) Optik high speed cap is 125GB per month and the Optik high speed turbo cap is 250GB per month. They can charge $2 per GB over the limit, but it's not clear (to me at least) on how they are enforcing it, if at all.
Burninator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 03:29 PM   #379
theonlywhiteout
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

actually flaming choy is correct. at this time telus cannot tell the difference. and for non tv clients the cap isnt enforced with the charges. you get a warning if you are a consitent abuser, which could lead to a suspension of service
theonlywhiteout is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to theonlywhiteout For This Useful Post:
Old 02-02-2011, 03:45 PM   #380
woob
#1 Goaltender
 
woob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Burninator View Post
Sweet zombie Jesus.

Last month I totaled 220GB and half way through this month I am at 140GB. My cap is 60GB...

That seems insanely high. I think I should change the password on my wireless just to be on the safe side.


LOOK AT ALL HIS PORN!!!
woob is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
luongo supports ubb , oilers stink!


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:20 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy