Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Other Sports: Football, Baseball, Local Hockey, Etc...
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-04-2011, 06:22 PM   #41
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

I was listening to a Mike McCarthy presser from earlier today and he said that Packers starters missed 206 games this season due to injury. Absurd number.
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2011, 06:51 PM   #42
Cheerio
#1 Goaltender
 
Cheerio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99 View Post
I was listening to a Mike McCarthy presser from earlier today and he said that Packers starters missed 206 games this season due to injury. Absurd number.
Especially in only a 17 game season! Wow!
Cheerio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2011, 07:55 PM   #43
browna
Franchise Player
 
browna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Interesting that Ivory is out this week. Pete Carroll said he was the difference in the game SEA played earlier in the year, as he ran all over them, and SEA didn't really game plan for him.

Weather could be a great equalizer. Can SEA cover...maybe. Can they win? Doubtful, but would rather play a dome team in NO then GB given the way the Packers are playing.

Again, I don't buy any of this talk for reseeding or schedule changes. A lot of it is coming out of NY simply because the Giants were out. Its happened once in the NFL, and 34 years since St. Louis Blues were the last team to win a division with a losing record.

No apologies from this Seattle fan. Team is in the middle of rebuilding, with what could be a record for transactions in a year. But hung in there, win the clutch game when it matters, beat good teams like Chicago and San Diego (at the time), and win 4 of 6 in the division. Sure, had the second easiest schedule in the league, after winning 9 games the past two seasons combined, but just because Singeltary run the 49'ers into the ground and few people thought the Cardinals were a decent team without Warner, doesn't change winning the division and that should earn you an advantage in any league, in this case, earning a home playoff date. Making the playoffs is a bonus for a team in transition, and there are no false pretenses from the players that they are an elite team or anything like that...but the confidence this will give the franchise going forward will hopefully help them take the next step when they get more stability into next year.

They will have to be better next year, SEA has a tougher schedule next year (teams already announced) and making the playoffs drop them 13 spots at least in the draft.

Last edited by browna; 01-04-2011 at 07:57 PM.
browna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2011, 10:52 PM   #44
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Again, I don't buy any of this talk for reseeding or schedule changes. A lot of it is coming out of NY simply because the Giants were out. Its happened once in the NFL, and 34 years since St. Louis Blues were the last team to win a division with a losing record.
Its not about just the Seahawks though...its every single game this weekend, the team with the better record or head to head advantage is travelling. It really doesn't amke any sense and it would in a lot of scenarios make the final weekends games a whole lot more meaningful. And this is nothing new, they have been talking about this for years. I am not of the opinion that Seattle should not be in the playoffs...they won their division and earned that spot. They should not, however, be hosting the game to a team that not only beat them once already but finished 4 games better.
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to transplant99 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-04-2011, 11:01 PM   #45
flames_1987
#1 Springs1 Fan
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: -
Exp:
Default

Indy isn't going to blow out the Jets, they don't have the firepower right now to blow out many teams right now. But I do believe the Colts can get the running game going against this team and slug it out with the Jets. 23-20 Colts
flames_1987 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2011, 01:46 AM   #46
PIMking
Franchise Player
 
PIMking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Exp:
Default

I do find it comical that a raider fan makes a sig about domination when his team is sledding for the winter...
__________________
Thank you for everything CP. Good memories and thankful for everything that has been done to help me out. I will no longer take part on these boards. Take care, Go Flames Go.
PIMking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2011, 10:26 AM   #47
burn_baby_burn
Franchise Player
 
burn_baby_burn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chiefs Kingdom, Yankees Universe, C of Red.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
I don't recall ever seeing a team have as easy a schedule as KC did this year.
1972 Dolphins come to mind. Opponents winning percentage was 0.357. I do believe that that still is the easiest schedule in NFL history. Also the 1999 St. Louis Rams had an easy schedule as well. If memory serves, it is the 2nd easiest schedule in NFL history. Although I don't recall the opponents winning percentage.
__________________
burn_baby_burn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2011, 10:33 AM   #48
burn_baby_burn
Franchise Player
 
burn_baby_burn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chiefs Kingdom, Yankees Universe, C of Red.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PIMking View Post
I do find it comical that a raider fan makes a sig about domination when his team is sledding for the winter...
The Chiefs went 4-12 last season. However, the beat down of the Denver Broncos in Denver in the final game of the season last year. Made me feel like a Super Bowl Champion. Although in the Raiders case, they didn't knock the Chiefs out of the playoffs on Sunday. Still, 6-0 in the division is something to be really proud off. On the other hand, I would be embarrassed that the team missed the playoffs after sweeping the division. Typical Raiders though. Their worst enemy is themselves.

Long live Al Davis!
__________________
burn_baby_burn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2011, 12:24 PM   #49
Sylvanfan
Appealing my suspension
 
Sylvanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Just outside Enemy Lines
Exp:
Default

The other thing for people who complain about easy schedules, say the NFL allowed 8 playoff teams in each Conference just like the NHL or NBA. The Buccaneers and Giants would make it in the NFC, as would the Seahawks with their 7-9 record. So in the NFC, only 7 out of 16 teams were above .500. The AFC is the same way where 7 teams finished above .500 and than Jacksonville and the Raiders were 8-8.

So for all of you whining about a team beating up on teams without winning records...guess what, half the league is made of teams that posted a losing record and many teams with winning records, had those records because they beat the teams they should.
__________________
"Some guys like old balls"
Patriots QB Tom Brady
Sylvanfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2011, 01:55 PM   #50
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sylvanfan View Post
The other thing for people who complain about easy schedules, say the NFL allowed 8 playoff teams in each Conference just like the NHL or NBA. The Buccaneers and Giants would make it in the NFC, as would the Seahawks with their 7-9 record. So in the NFC, only 7 out of 16 teams were above .500. The AFC is the same way where 7 teams finished above .500 and than Jacksonville and the Raiders were 8-8.

So for all of you whining about a team beating up on teams without winning records...guess what, half the league is made of teams that posted a losing record and many teams with winning records, had those records because they beat the teams they should.

To take that a step further....I dont believe there is such a thing as an "easy" schedule in the NFL. Its a tough hard bruising business and indeed league, and there are very few "easy" games. Every week we see upsets, that should tell you something.

Yes some teams have easier schedules than others, but none of them are easy.
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2011, 03:11 PM   #51
GirlySports
NOT breaking news
 
GirlySports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman View Post
More than re-seeding, I think the NFL has to look at the unbalanced schedules. Every year a few teams sneak into the playoffs due to weak schedules, and better teams miss the playoffs because of brutal schedules.

Teams with good records are punished, and weak teams are rewarded.
I don't know how you can make a 16 game schedule in a 32 team league fair. If you play everyone in your conference once and be assigned a division in the other conference, that would make for 19 games.
Then you could just forget division winners and just take the top 6 in each conference.
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire

GirlySports is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2011, 03:36 PM   #52
Montana Moe
First Line Centre
 
Montana Moe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Exp:
Default

Pierre Thomas on IR as well, Saints are going to be the Drew Brees show this weekend...
Montana Moe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2011, 04:02 PM   #53
burn_baby_burn
Franchise Player
 
burn_baby_burn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chiefs Kingdom, Yankees Universe, C of Red.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99 View Post
To take that a step further....I dint believe there is such a thing as an "easy" schedule in the NFL. Its a tough hard bruising business and indeed league, and there are very few "easy" games. Every week we see upsets, that should tell you something.

Yes some teams have easier schedules than others, but none of them are easy.
Every year at this time people are going to complain about how one or two playoff teams had "easy" schedules. Two years ago it was the Cardinals that everyone was whining about. Yet they came damn close to winning the Super Bowl.

When we talk about differences in schedule. We are talking a swing from opponents winning percentage of like 0.450 to 0.575 (or something close to that affect). It shouldn't make that much of a difference either way.
__________________
burn_baby_burn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2011, 10:15 AM   #54
OILFAN #81
Everyone's Favorite Oilfan!
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Jose, California
Exp:
Default

KC had 3 pro bowl players this year. 2 of them (Bowe and Waters) missed practice on Thursday and are questionable for this weekend's playoff game:

http://www.tsn.ca/nfl/story/?id=348172
OILFAN #81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2011, 10:26 AM   #55
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OILFAN #81 View Post
KC had 3 pro bowl players this year. 2 of them (Bowe and Waters) missed practice on Thursday and are questionable for this weekend's playoff game:

http://www.tsn.ca/nfl/story/?id=348172

I was curious why the Chiefs signed Kevin Curtis yesterday....insurance in case Bowe cant go.
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2011, 10:45 AM   #56
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlySports View Post
I don't know how you can make a 16 game schedule in a 32 team league fair. If you play everyone in your conference once and be assigned a division in the other conference, that would make for 19 games.
Then you could just forget division winners and just take the top 6 in each conference.
I agree there is not much wiggle room. However, why do the Colts and Pats have to play each other every year? The NFL likes the ratings.
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2011, 10:50 AM   #57
burn_baby_burn
Franchise Player
 
burn_baby_burn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chiefs Kingdom, Yankees Universe, C of Red.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman View Post
I agree there is not much wiggle room. However, why do the Colts and Pats have to play each other every year? The NFL likes the ratings.
Because they play in the same conference and both win their division every year. Or if that scenario doesn't take place they are guaranteed to play each other every three years. That is the only reason. The NFL doesn't just schedule marquee match ups for ratings. They have a set system for scheduling games.
__________________
burn_baby_burn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2011, 10:51 AM   #58
burn_baby_burn
Franchise Player
 
burn_baby_burn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chiefs Kingdom, Yankees Universe, C of Red.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OILFAN #81 View Post
KC had 3 pro bowl players this year. 2 of them (Bowe and Waters) missed practice on Thursday and are questionable for this weekend's playoff game:

http://www.tsn.ca/nfl/story/?id=348172
Bowe has an illness. Waters is assumed to have an illness yet there wasn't much clarification as to what yesterday.
__________________
burn_baby_burn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2011, 11:32 AM   #59
habernac
Franchise Player
 
habernac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: sector 7G
Exp:
Default

hilarious article on the new playoff OT rule:

http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2...6&sportCat=nfl
habernac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2011, 12:28 PM   #60
Sainters7
Franchise Player
 
Sainters7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: back in the 403
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Montana Moe View Post
Pierre Thomas on IR as well, Saints are going to be the Drew Brees show this weekend...
Unbelieveable news between Ivory and PT the past 2 days, man has our run game been decimated this year. Look at our RB depth chart:

1. Pierre Thomas - IR
2. Reggie Bush - Healthy but missed most of regular season due to injury
3. Lynell Hamilton - IR
4. Chris Ivory - IR
5. Julius Jones
6. PJ Hill - IR
7. Ladell Betts - IR

I'm not trying to go into the dance with such negative vibes, but basically not having a run game when you're going on the road in the playoffs is a huge blow to your playoff hopes. If we beat Seattle, I'd much rather go to the Georgia Dome in the divisionals than snowy Soldier Field. That's where you need a strong run game. Colour me very concerned..
Sainters7 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:56 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy