Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-15-2010, 11:11 AM   #21
NBC
Account closed at user's request.
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

Go see someone that practices Active Release (ART). It is soft tissue work that is like a short, intense therapeutic massage session. There are lots of chiropractors and physiotherapists that use this technique.

I'd disagree with the poster who said that modern chiros are all about weekly repeat visits. Lots of them utilize different techniques other than the standard spinal manipulation procedure.
NBC is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to NBC For This Useful Post:
Old 12-15-2010, 11:27 AM   #22
Titan
First Line Centre
 
Titan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman View Post
There really is no argument when you look at the scientific evidence.
I find it stunning that you as a lawyer so readily discount the actual evidence that exists on this topic.
Titan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2010, 11:30 AM   #23
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Titan View Post
I find it stunning that you as a lawyer so readily discount the actual evidence that exists on this topic.
http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?cat=4&paged=2

The General Chiropractic Council, a UK-wide statutory body with regulatory powers, has just published a new position statement on the chiropractic subluxation complex:
The chiropractic vertebral subluxation complex is an historical concept but it remains a theoretical model. It is not supported by any clinical research evidence that would allow claims to be made that it is the cause of disease or health concerns.
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2010, 11:32 AM   #24
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?cat=4&paged=2

I spent 43 years in private practice as a “science-based” chiropractor and a critic of the chiropractic vertebral subluxation theory. I am often asked how I justified practicing as a chiropractor while renouncing the basic tenets of chiropractic. My answer has always been: I was able to offer manipulation in combination with physical therapy modalities as a treatment for mechanical-type back pain—a service that was not readily available in physiotherapy or in any other sub-specialty of medicine.

If I had it to do over again, however, I would study physical therapy rather than chiropractic. Considering the controversy that continues to surround the practice of chiropractic, I would not recommend that anyone spend the time, effort, and money required to earn a degree in chiropractic. Physical therapy, which is now beginning to include spinal manipulation in its treatment armamentarium, may offer better opportunity for those interested in manual therapy. Properly-limited, science-based chiropractors are now essentially competing with physical therapists who use manual therapy. Unfortunately, only a few chiropractors have renounced the vertebral subluxation theory, making it difficult to find a “good chiropractor.”
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to troutman For This Useful Post:
Old 12-15-2010, 11:32 AM   #25
NBC
Account closed at user's request.
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman View Post
There really is no argument when you look at the scientific evidence.
And medical researchers have no agendas? Their research proposals/projects are completely transparent?
NBC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2010, 11:34 AM   #26
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?cat=4&paged=2

An article written by 3 chiropractors and a PhD in physical education and published on December 2, 2009 in the journal Chiropractic and Osteopathy may have sounded the death knell for chiropractic.

What’s the evidence? In the 114 years since chiropractic began, the existence of chiropractic subluxations has never been objectively demonstrated. They have never been shown to cause interference with the nervous system. They have never been shown to cause disease. Critics of chiropractic have been pointing this out for decades, but now chiropractors themselves have come to the same conclusion
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to troutman For This Useful Post:
Old 12-15-2010, 11:41 AM   #27
NBC
Account closed at user's request.
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

This is the part of the article that I love the most:

"The authors declare that they have no competing interests."

That would be a first.
NBC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2010, 12:01 PM   #28
yyjvisitor
Draft Pick
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Default

The best chiro in town. Dr Ryan Carter. He is in the West Hills Town Centre. I go see him when I am in Calgary.

For all those nay sayers. If it works, do it and if doesn't work for you find something else. Chiros have been adjusting/manipulating the spine for over a hundred years. Why do you think physios and med doctors are learning it now? Because it works!
yyjvisitor is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to yyjvisitor For This Useful Post:
Old 12-15-2010, 12:04 PM   #29
4X4
One of the Nine
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NBC View Post
I'd disagree with the poster who said that modern chiros are all about weekly repeat visits. Lots of them utilize different techniques other than the standard spinal manipulation procedure.
I've had a chiropractor try to get me to come for a whole bunch of visits, just to get a little kink out of my back. It was a total scam. He had me stand there and do this and do that, raise my arm, move my knee, and did this big stupid "assessment", and then told me that my posture was wrong and I needed to do a bunch of visits to correct all this stuff, and that afterward, the kink would be gone. ##### that. I just needed the guy to crack my back. 5 years later, I go to the chiro maybe twice a year, and I'm just fine.

There are chiros out there that are actually feeding this garbage to people that are perfectly fine.
4X4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2010, 12:25 PM   #30
Hanni
First Line Centre
 
Hanni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buzzard View Post
he always wants me back to "finish" the treatment, although I never really get any relief.
Think about that.
Am I the only one who's first thought was that this was a happy ending joke?
Hanni is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Hanni For This Useful Post:
Old 12-15-2010, 12:37 PM   #31
Tiger
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Tiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Slightly right of left of center
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shermanator View Post
Dr. Don Findlay - Located in the strip mall across from Winston Churchill high school.

No website, but my family has been going to him for 30 years...
Don is very good too, and his Son's are good too. There in the south at elbow and Southland (Daniel and Donald Findlay). That is where I go.

One plus is they are not the fluffy 'life energy' type chiropractors that give the whole industry a bad name
__________________
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
- Aristotle
Tiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2010, 12:40 PM   #32
NBC
Account closed at user's request.
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4X4 View Post
I've had a chiropractor try to get me to come for a whole bunch of visits, just to get a little kink out of my back. It was a total scam. He had me stand there and do this and do that, raise my arm, move my knee, and did this big stupid "assessment", and then told me that my posture was wrong and I needed to do a bunch of visits to correct all this stuff, and that afterward, the kink would be gone. ##### that. I just needed the guy to crack my back. 5 years later, I go to the chiro maybe twice a year, and I'm just fine.

There are chiros out there that are actually feeding this garbage to people that are perfectly fine.
Glad you didn't buy it. That is the best way of weeding out money-makers from decent practitioners. If they want you to commit to 3x/week for 3 months, run away and fast.

Whenever I'm in YYC, I visit my chiro, who happens to be a family friend. He does ART and if I need it a spinal manipulation. I'm a big fan of soft tissue work. Most of my issues tended to be with muscles and fascia and not the spine/neck.
NBC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2010, 12:41 PM   #33
Guest1
Guest
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NBC View Post
Go see someone that practices Active Release (ART). It is soft tissue work that is like a short, intense therapeutic massage session. There are lots of chiropractors and physiotherapists that use this technique.

I'd disagree with the poster who said that modern chiros are all about weekly repeat visits. Lots of them utilize different techniques other than the standard spinal manipulation procedure.
Glen Hawkins does this...
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2010, 12:48 PM   #34
Tiger
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Tiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Slightly right of left of center
Exp:
Default

troutman

You are often referring to the claim of Chiropractors helping cure illnesses, and prevent nervous system problems. Which is fine, I believe you they don't do that! And I don't trust any chiropractor or anybody for that matter that is using bad science and making claims. But what most people here are talking about is pain and discomfort. And Chiropractors can relieve back pain and other areas of the body too (I've had my shoulder fixed and ART after a leg injury too where I had minimal range of motion in my quad). And even in your webpages you linked us too it say Chiropractors are good for quick relief of pain that can be caused by misalignments
__________________
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
- Aristotle
Tiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2010, 12:52 PM   #35
mrgreen
Farm Team Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Dr LeDrew at Full Potential on 17th Ave up in the strip mall just before Sarcee is awesome. Totally recommend a visit to his place. All sorts of treatments and he's a great guy. Google 'full potential' for his website.
mrgreen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mrgreen For This Useful Post:
Old 12-15-2010, 01:40 PM   #36
TheSutterDynasty
First Line Centre
 
TheSutterDynasty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NBC View Post
I'd disagree with the poster who said that modern chiros are all about weekly repeat visits. Lots of them utilize different techniques other than the standard spinal manipulation procedure.
Chiropractors are now modifying all their procedures and ideologies to do what Physiotherapists have been doing for many years.

They're still not even close.
TheSutterDynasty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2010, 01:48 PM   #37
amorak
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: 51.04177 -114.19704
Exp:
Default

Chiros are jokes and not real doctors.
amorak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2010, 01:51 PM   #38
4X4
One of the Nine
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by amorak View Post
Chiros are jokes and not real doctors.
I wouldn't go that far. I don't really care about the title debate, but they're not jokes. A good chiro gets a bad kink out of your back and gets you back to what you should be doing.
4X4 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 4X4 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-15-2010, 03:32 PM   #39
TheSutterDynasty
First Line Centre
 
TheSutterDynasty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4X4 View Post
I wouldn't go that far. I don't really care about the title debate, but they're not jokes. A good chiro gets a bad kink out of your back and gets you back to what you should be doing.
There's a reason that kink in your back keeps returning. It isn't fixed, merely dealt with and put aside for when it arises again.

And I don't know why people think chiropractors have a PHD, it's 4 years of schooling on top of an undergrad degree. 8 years /=/ doctor.
TheSutterDynasty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2010, 03:35 PM   #40
Northendzone
Franchise Player
 
Northendzone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Exp:
Default

Dr Rob Weaver knows ART just like Bo knows football.....
Northendzone is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:08 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy