11-14-2010, 06:43 PM
|
#2541
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OILFAN #81
Yeah I figured. So do you go with Jackson then or do you find another QB?
|
Jackson is Chilly's guy so he's no lock to be a starter when the new head coach takes over.
|
|
|
|
11-14-2010, 06:45 PM
|
#2542
|
|
Everyone's Favorite Oilfan!
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Jose, California
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
Jackson is Chilly's guy so he's no lock to be a starter when the new head coach takes over.
|
Who is available next season? Donovan McNabb? (Although his agent opened up contract talks again with Washington today). Michael Vick?
|
|
|
|
|
11-14-2010, 08:27 PM
|
#2543
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
So far, so good.
Hopefully the Pats can hold onto this lead.
|
|
|
|
|
11-14-2010, 08:47 PM
|
#2544
|
|
Franchise Player
|
LOL at that kick by Reed.
__________________
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER. I love power.
|
|
|
|
|
11-14-2010, 08:49 PM
|
#2545
|
|
RANDOM USER TITLE CHANGE
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Machiavelli
LOL at that kick by Reed.
|
Not impressed 
|
|
|
|
|
11-14-2010, 08:54 PM
|
#2546
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Brady has really let himself go.
And by himself, I mean his hair.
__________________
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER. I love power.
|
|
|
|
|
11-14-2010, 09:41 PM
|
#2547
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OILFAN #81
Yeah I figured. So do you go with Jackson then or do you find another QB?
|
I'd like to see if Jackson has anything this season but I don't really have high hopes that a new coaching staff will inherit Chilly's QB project.
With Childress shown the door, I'm sure Jackson won't have much of a leash at all.
What are they going to do at QB? I have no idea, but I hope they get one that can be the future QB of this team and not just use veteran quarterbacks for the foreseeable future.
|
|
|
|
|
11-14-2010, 10:17 PM
|
#2548
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Portland, OR
|
Jake Locker looks great in purple...
|
|
|
|
|
11-14-2010, 10:51 PM
|
#2549
|
|
Everyone's Favorite Oilfan!
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Jose, California
|
Some wacky playoff matchups in the AFC if the playoffs started today (can't do NFC since Philly vs Washington play tomorrow).
AFC:
Byes: 1. NY Jets (7-2), 2. Baltimore (6-3)
(6) Pittsburgh (6-3) @ (3) Indianapolis (6-3)
(5) New England (7-2) @ (4) Oakland (5-4)
These will change for sure as all of these teams still have 9 games to go and 4 to 5 other teams still are right there to get in the playoffs.
Last edited by OILFAN #81; 11-15-2010 at 01:13 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
11-14-2010, 11:24 PM
|
#2550
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
Apparently Todd Haley was upset about how the Broncos played the second half. He refused to shake McDaniels' hand after the game.
|
|
|
|
|
11-14-2010, 11:37 PM
|
#2551
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: sector 7G
|
couldn't pick a game to save my life today.
|
|
|
|
|
11-14-2010, 11:43 PM
|
#2552
|
|
Everyone's Favorite Oilfan!
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Jose, California
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube
Apparently Todd Haley was upset about how the Broncos played the second half. He refused to shake McDaniels' hand after the game.
|
I never watched the game, how did the Broncos play the 2nd half? I saw it was like 35-0 in the 2nd quarter and they finished with 49 points. So I don't think they ran up the score?...
|
|
|
|
|
11-14-2010, 11:48 PM
|
#2553
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
They had a few passes here and there from what I recall, but I'm not sure why that would upset him? I stopped watching the game about 5 mins before the game finished though, so many something happen then?
|
|
|
|
|
11-15-2010, 06:00 AM
|
#2554
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Pats played lights out the whole game and made the Steelers look bad.
Brady proving once again he is among the best of the best.
|
|
|
|
|
11-15-2010, 07:38 AM
|
#2555
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Portland, OR
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube
Apparently Todd Haley was upset about how the Broncos played the second half. He refused to shake McDaniels' hand after the game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Montana Moe For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
11-15-2010, 07:58 AM
|
#2556
|
|
Fearmongerer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
|
The whole thing is likely explained here........
Quote:
Denver still had its starters in late in the contest, and it continued passing even with a comfortable lead.
The Chiefs had a chance in last season's finale, which Kansas City won 44-24, to leave its starters in and allow running back Jamaal Charles to pursue the NFL's single-game rushing yards record. Instead, the Chiefs pulled Charles with 259 yards, 37 shy of Adrian Peterson's record. The Chiefs removed most of their starters in that game after the score was out of Denver's reach.
It was clear Sunday that Kansas City took exception to the fact that Denver didn't afford the Chiefs the same courtesy Sunday.
|
http://chiefsblog.kansascity.com/?q=node/1544
|
|
|
|
|
11-15-2010, 08:12 AM
|
#2557
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99
|
All that tells me is that they should have tried to get Charles the record last year and now the HC feels like an idiot. IMO when you are a bad team like the Broncos you should continue to go 100% to install confidence. If Haley didn't like it he should be mad at his defense for not stopping the Broncos starters.
Another thing that's annoying with this is that the Chiefs continued to throw the ball to the sum of over 400 yards. I don't get why his starters should get to continue to go 100% and the Broncos throw in their backups and punt the ball every posession just because they got a big lead early. To me it's one of those things that you always learn more about people when things go bad as opposed to things going well. Haley is a hot head and a baby. I'm sure they are one more loss away from him starting to berate his players on the sideline like he did last year.
Last edited by Erick Estrada; 11-15-2010 at 08:15 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
11-15-2010, 08:49 AM
|
#2558
|
|
NOT breaking news
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
|
It's all good. More hate between division rivals can't hurt! 
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire
|
|
|
|
|
11-15-2010, 08:52 AM
|
#2559
|
|
RANDOM USER TITLE CHANGE
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheese
Pats played lights out the whole game and made the Steelers look bad.
Brady proving once again he is among the best of the best.
|
Yeah, lost some money on this game unfortunately. Oh well, so long as the Steelers get into the playoffs i'll be happy with this season. They wen't 3-1 without Roethlisberger which was way better than I expected.
|
|
|
|
|
11-15-2010, 09:34 AM
|
#2560
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
All that tells me is that they should have tried to get Charles the record last year and now the HC feels like an idiot. IMO when you are a bad team like the Broncos you should continue to go 100% to install confidence. If Haley didn't like it he should be mad at his defense for not stopping the Broncos starters.
Another thing that's annoying with this is that the Chiefs continued to throw the ball to the sum of over 400 yards. I don't get why his starters should get to continue to go 100% and the Broncos throw in their backups and punt the ball every posession just because they got a big lead early. To me it's one of those things that you always learn more about people when things go bad as opposed to things going well. Haley is a hot head and a baby. I'm sure they are one more loss away from him starting to berate his players on the sideline like he did last year.
|
+1. These guys are professionals, if you don't like it, STOP THEM. Frankly, any time you can bury a divisional opponent you do it. If the flames took the gas off, particularly against the canucks, oilers, avalanche or Wild i'd be furious.
__________________
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:37 AM.
|
|
