11-04-2010, 10:17 AM
|
#21
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by J epworth kendal
There will be leeches on the trains??!
|
Actually....yes, in a manner of speaking...
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans
If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
|
|
|
11-04-2010, 12:46 PM
|
#22
|
Franchise Player
|
I don't live in the south east anymore so I dont' give a flying fart.
|
|
|
11-04-2010, 12:55 PM
|
#23
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Violating Copyrights
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta
How many people 100K 200K? Past history says people wont take the bus from the Train to get to work so how many people in the SE could theoretically use this service (City of Calgary only) for transportation to downtown, university etc? I am for public transportation but the costs have to be justifiable and not just a way to increase someones property value.
Why would I drive down there, it would just waste gas and contribute to our already looming Al Gore environmental greenhouse gas disaster 
|
This is a quick analysis of the current situation in the deep SE, east of the Bow river.
Downtown Express
Douglasdale Express 6 buses
Cranston Express - 4 buses
McKenzie Express - 10 buses
Douglas Glen Express - 2 buses
McKenzie Towne Express - 10 buses
New Brighton Express - 7 buses
39 Downtown expresses a day.
Regular routes serving Downtown/Ogden/Quarry Park/Surrounding Industrial
24 Ogden - ~50 buses
409 Douglas Glen ~40 buses
302 SE BRT Lots of buses
Regular routes from deep SE communities that feed Anderson or Sommerset LRT.
416
92
96
406
14
153
Ridership is very high during the morning and evening rush, even the BRT
|
|
|
11-04-2010, 01:08 PM
|
#24
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Calgary
|
Part of me thinks that there's probably as much demand, if not more, for the SE LRT compared to the WLRT. Loads of people work in the Foothills Industrial area, plus all of the residential that extends into the deep south.
Not saying that we don't need both, but I can't see the SE LRT being anything less than a slam dunk in terms of ridership.
Random thought: I wonder if there is a way to add a surcharge to the SE LRT to help fund itself? Obviously, it would have to be built first, but a portion of the cost could be recovered by having an extra $1 or 2 tacked onto the ticket price for those using that line for 2, 3, 5 years. For people to buy into that I think that it would have to go directly to paying down the debt from the project, and for a finite length of time.
|
|
|
11-04-2010, 01:15 PM
|
#25
|
Franchise Player
|
i remeber buying my house in mackenzie towne and the sales guy in the show home was showing me the plans forthe LRT track - my reaction at that time was I'd be surrpised if I could take the train home from my last day at work before I retired........
I think the BRT was built somewhat to calm the masses - given the per km cost of building LRT lines, it is going to be a long time before there is a line that loops out to the hospital.
it is surprising that mayor nenshi may not be able to deliver on some of his promises?
|
|
|
11-04-2010, 01:41 PM
|
#26
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northendzone
it is surprising that mayor nenshi may not be able to deliver on some of his promises?
|
Nenshi can want the SELRT more than anything in the world, but this funding was never intended for SE LRT and he is, after all, just one vote on city council. McIver also campaigned in favour of building the SE LRT and also wouldn't have been able to use this funding for that.
|
|
|
11-04-2010, 01:43 PM
|
#27
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northendzone
i remeber buying my house in mackenzie towne and the sales guy in the show home was showing me the plans forthe LRT track - my reaction at that time was I'd be surrpised if I could take the train home from my last day at work before I retired........
I think the BRT was built somewhat to calm the masses - given the per km cost of building LRT lines, it is going to be a long time before there is a line that loops out to the hospital.
it is surprising that mayor nenshi may not be able to deliver on some of his promises?
|
Never! For me as a voter to be satisfied that this magical man is truly the one with all the answers I shant be happy unless I see him building the damned thing himself on evenings and weekends and with his own money!
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans
If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
|
|
|
11-04-2010, 02:01 PM
|
#28
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mayor of McKenzie Towne
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northendzone
i remeber buying my house in mackenzie towne and the sales guy in the show home was showing me the plans forthe LRT track - my reaction at that time was I'd be surrpised if I could take the train home from my last day at work before I retired........
I think the BRT was built somewhat to calm the masses - given the per km cost of building LRT lines, it is going to be a long time before there is a line that loops out to the hospital.
it is surprising that mayor nenshi may not be able to deliver on some of his promises?
|
Nenshi never promised a SE LRT.
The farthest I am aware that he went regarding it, is to say that he supports it.
Naheed's Policy Statement #5 (Better Idea regarding public transit) demonstrating what he did promise regarding transit.
__________________
"Teach a man to reason, and he'll think for a lifetime"
~P^2
|
|
|
11-04-2010, 02:01 PM
|
#29
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
|
We don't need a SE LRT!
I much prefer sitting on Deerfoot every morning for an hour waiting for the eventual gridlock at Douglasdale, and then Anderson, and then Southland because the only entranceway into our area of the City was never designed to handle the amount of people living in the SE quadrant.
Thank goodness we now have the BRT. Not only do they stop every 3 minutes, but it takes me a full hour to get from McKenzie Towne to downtown! Who needs to drive when the bus ride is even longer!
But yes, let's definitely build that airport tunnel ASAP.
/rant
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Tyler For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-04-2010, 02:05 PM
|
#30
|
CP Gamemaster
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Gary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyler
But yes, let's definitely build that airport tunnel ASAP.
/rant
|
Yes, let's build the tunnel now so we can use the ~$750 million we saved by doing it now on the SE LRT!
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Mazrim For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-04-2010, 02:08 PM
|
#31
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyler
We don't need a SE LRT!
I much prefer sitting on Deerfoot every morning for an hour waiting for the eventual gridlock at Douglasdale, and then Anderson, and then Southland because the only entranceway into our area of the City was never designed to handle the amount of people living in the SE quadrant.
Thank goodness we now have the BRT. Not only do they stop every 3 minutes, but it takes me a full hour to get from McKenzie Towne to downtown! Who needs to drive when the bus ride is even longer!
But yes, let's definitely build that airport tunnel ASAP.
/rant
|
things you should have realized before you moved there?
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to moncton golden flames For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-04-2010, 02:15 PM
|
#32
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Calgary
|
The big problem with BRT, obviously, is that the bus is stuck in the same traffic that the cars are. A dedicated (new) bus lane on Deerfoot would make that BRT sing, but of course who would pay for it? And there are probably plenty of other logistical problems with it. But the point remains that a bus in traffic is pretty similar as a car in traffic.
|
|
|
11-04-2010, 02:17 PM
|
#33
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by moncton golden flames
things you should have realized before you moved there?
|
I hear this argument a lot, and I agree. But its the same for people who moved closer to downtown and their complaints about everything from taxation to traffic. People like to bitch about their current situation, but unless you moved there prior to the issues, you knew about it before you moved.
|
|
|
11-04-2010, 03:17 PM
|
#34
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Calgary, AB
|
I think they should push to get the downtown LRT underground or above ground (+15 level) first.
|
|
|
11-04-2010, 03:27 PM
|
#35
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Supporting Urban Sprawl
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy Stang
The big problem with BRT, obviously, is that the bus is stuck in the same traffic that the cars are. A dedicated (new) bus lane on Deerfoot would make that BRT sing, but of course who would pay for it? And there are probably plenty of other logistical problems with it. But the point remains that a bus in traffic is pretty similar as a car in traffic.
|
Except the BRT does not travel the most congested area of that commute, the Igor strong bridge through the Southland interchange. It cuts up through Douglas Glen, Quarry Park and Ogden Rd. All of which are pretty decent whenever I go through there.
__________________
"Wake up, Luigi! The only time plumbers sleep on the job is when we're working by the hour."
|
|
|
11-04-2010, 03:29 PM
|
#36
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepper24
I think they should push to get the downtown LRT underground or above ground (+15 level) first.
|
Actually there is already underground tunnelling and at least one station (below city hall) that was put in in the 80's.
|
|
|
11-04-2010, 04:56 PM
|
#37
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Violating Copyrights
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepper24
I think they should push to get the downtown LRT underground or above ground (+15 level) first.
|
Building the SE LRT can't happen without a subway downtown. If the line is a go, the subway is part of it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rathji
Except the BRT does not travel the most congested area of that commute, the Igor strong bridge through the Southland interchange. It cuts up through Douglas Glen, Quarry Park and Ogden Rd. All of which are pretty decent whenever I go through there.
|
LOL... Ivor Strong
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Barnes For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-04-2010, 05:07 PM
|
#38
|
tromboner
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by frinkprof
$200M for LRVs would be great because they are needed for growth and replacements of old units on the existing lines anyway. That would buy about 50 LRVs. Current fleet will be just over 190 once all of the current order arrive.
|
If the 7th Ave corridor is at capacity already, are the additional LRVs just to cover the expansion to four cars?
IMO it makes more sense to expand capacity then buy the cars to fill it... a track with less than saturated service is still useful, whereas a car with no track capacity to run on isn't.
Also "replacements"? Really? I had no ideas the LRVs were disposable.
Also, leeches!  Calgary really needs to team up with Edmonton to get a pro-urban party into the provincial legislature.
Last edited by SebC; 11-04-2010 at 05:10 PM.
|
|
|
11-04-2010, 05:15 PM
|
#39
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Actually us inner city folk who can walk to work that get the shaft.
Great to hear that a billion dollars has just got allocated to the subburbs again.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to username For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-04-2010, 05:17 PM
|
#40
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta
How many people 100K 200K? Past history says people wont take the bus from the Train to get to work so how many people in the SE could theoretically use this service (City of Calgary only) for transportation to downtown, university etc? I am for public transportation but the costs have to be justifiable and not just a way to increase someones property value.
Why would I drive down there, it would just waste gas and contribute to our already looming Al Gore environmental greenhouse gas disaster 
|
A massive park and ride lot has just opened up in Mckenzie Towne and is filled up mon-fri. The SE is going to need a train line sooner rather than later. But like others have said this money was never allocated for a SE train line so the the council will have to work some magic to get the project started.
Last edited by Super-Rye; 11-04-2010 at 05:19 PM.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:44 AM.
|
|