WEEK 4: Riders at STAMPEDERS - Page 13 - Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

chalms04 · 07-25-2010, 01:18 AM

Phew, made it out alive. Sure felt nice to shut the guys up on the way home that were prematurely chanting "4-0" on the train to the game!

valo403 · 07-25-2010, 01:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by troutman

Good thing Bryant had a good 2nd half - I think he was on the verge of getting fired.

Is it just me, or does Henry throw the ball too often where players should be, rather than where they actually are?

Defence looks great. Running game is impressive when both Reynolds and Cornish can spell each other.

Durant throws a lot of jump balls - lucky for him his players come down with a lot of them.

Didn't get to see the game, but that's pretty much what a QB is supposed to do. Recievers running poor routes isn't te QB's fault.

Trojan97 · 07-25-2010, 01:20 AM

I was fortunate enough to witness about 3-4 near brawls involving only Rider fans in the fourth quarter. Watching these "fans" completely meltdown into bouts of name calling amongst themselves was amazing and not surprising.

Also, props to the skanks who showed up halfway through the 1st quarter with signs of "Rough Ride Me" who then proceeded to spill beer all over themselves and other Rider fans while they tried to hold up their sign at random moments during play. It was a sad moment when Skank #1 sat on her green painted sign and had to leave before half due to paint all over her white shorts.

Way too represent the fan base ladies.

Bertuzzied · 07-25-2010, 02:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wingmaker

Where's Bertuzzied?

I had to bail at the beginning of the 4th quarter to go watch Inception, or as they call in Regina, Interception.

haha Stupid Riders. This feels just as good as a blow out win against the Canucks.

Bertuzzied · 07-25-2010, 02:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Azure

I like how this game thread has more posts than the game thread on GSG forum.

thats only because the Stamps are winning. If they were losing 40-11 I_h8_crawford would have 18 pages by himself.

OzSome · 07-25-2010, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger

Was the Lewis fumble actually a fumble? That was Lewis right?

I don't think so. BY watching the replays, it looks like his hand hit the ground and then the ball came out. Unfortunately the replay judge in Toronto couldn't see the way we did so it was inconclusive so the referee call on the field stands. Nothing to worry about because I thought the Dressler's catch could have been overturned as well. I thought he caught the ball but that too was inconclusive.

OzSome · 07-25-2010, 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bertuzzied

I had to bail at the beginning of the 4th quarter to go watch Inception, or as they call in Regina, Interception.

haha Stupid Riders. This feels just as good as a blow out win against the Canucks.

So, I guess you missed the run by Burris in the 2nd half then try to hit the guy who supposed to tackle him. Not bad for someone who can't run anymore.

Sorry Bert just giving you a hard time. hehehe!!

Machiavelli · 07-25-2010, 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arloiginla

Ahem...

7 catches, 116 yards, 2 touchdowns.

He's alright. And he's also probably better than any Winnipeg receiver (sorry couldn't resist throwing that in).

Oh, just wait.

Jesse834 · 07-25-2010, 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arloiginla

Ahem...

7 catches, 116 yards, 2 touchdowns.

He's alright. And he's also probably better than any Winnipeg receiver (sorry couldn't resist throwing that in).

When you look at it Calgary still does have a fairly deep receiving corps, when Rambo comes back it will be one of the best in the league again. With Rambo, Lewis, Sam, Bryant, Franklin, Forzani, Murphy that's a solid group.

I would take Terrence Edwards over Romby Bryant every time.

Bertuzzied · 07-25-2010, 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OzSome

So, I guess you missed the run by Burris in the 2nd half then try to hit the guy who supposed to tackle him. Not bad for someone who can't run anymore.

Sorry Bert just giving you a hard time. hehehe!!

Why is that a hard time? i was critical of Burris because he wasn't running anymore. Well guess how his play improved when he started to run.

And there was no way I was missing the end of this game. I pvr'd it and watched it when I got home.

troutman · 07-26-2010, 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by valo403

Didn't get to see the game, but that's pretty much what a QB is supposed to do. Recievers running poor routes isn't te QB's fault.

Sometimes the QB needs to pull the chute though, if he has time to make an adjustment. Forcing it into double coverage and hoping the right route is run, is not working.

valo403 · 07-26-2010, 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by troutman

Sometimes the QB needs to pull the chute though, if he has time to make an adjustment. Forcing it into double coverage and hoping the right route is run, is not working.

Agreed, saw the highlights and there were certainly situations where route running wasn't the issue. The one pick was clearly from the QB and WR being on different pages, but that heave into double coverage was all on Burris.

mykalberta · 07-26-2010, 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cKy

His injury from last year. One year to the day actually he ripped his knee out in BC. Still hasnt played.

Even now after all this time it was still a dirty play imo and probably the reason the stamps didnt do so well last year.

My Eskimos are well, still my Eskimos.