|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to LockedOut For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-01-2010, 09:07 PM
|
#2
|
|
Atomic Nerd
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary
|
Awesome for people with new homes with ethernet wiring running everywhere already especially the living room.
Will laugh when Monster Cable makes gold plated CAT-5 cables with carbon fibre connectors wrapped in genuine snakeskin leather.
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Hack&Lube For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
07-01-2010, 09:08 PM
|
#3
|
|
Pants Tent
|
Monster will soon come out with their Premium Ethernet Cables, which deliver a one million percent(!) improvement in image quality, compared to other cables! 
__________________
KIPPER IS KING
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to gottabekd For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
07-02-2010, 12:07 AM
|
#5
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: On my metal monster.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gottabekd
|
Wow, who ever buys those is clearly the most ######ed person in the history of man-kind.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to 3 Justin 3 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
07-02-2010, 12:46 AM
|
#6
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3 Justin 3
Wow, who ever buys those is clearly the most ######ed person in the history of man-kind.
|
$499.00?!?!  1.5m?!?!
|
|
|
|
|
07-02-2010, 12:52 AM
|
#7
|
|
tromboner
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
|
Rolling out in 2011? How will that work with current consoles, PCs, DVD/BR players, PVRs etc?
|
|
|
|
|
07-02-2010, 07:25 AM
|
#8
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Yay I am excited I allready have the house wired for cat5 now just need to wire home theatres with cat 6 and im laughing!
|
|
|
|
|
07-02-2010, 07:34 AM
|
#9
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Corpus Christi, Tx
|
Shhh don't tell anyone that a digital signal can't degrade over cable. I want to make tons of cash off idiots selling over priced Ethernet cables.
__________________
"If I could live my life all over it wouldnt matter anyway,
Cause I never could stay sober on the Corpus Christi Bay"
|
|
|
|
|
07-02-2010, 08:11 AM
|
#10
|
|
God of Hating Twitter
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gottabekd
|
Man too bad for the profanity filter cause WTF is that? 
__________________
Allskonar fyrir Aumingja!!
|
|
|
|
|
07-02-2010, 10:04 AM
|
#11
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
What really sucks is that I just bought a fancy HDMI switch to solve my current theatre problems. O well still need it for 2 years before this craziness commences
|
|
|
|
|
07-02-2010, 10:48 AM
|
#12
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Virginia
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tussery
Shhh don't tell anyone that a digital signal can't degrade over cable. I want to make tons of cash off idiots selling over priced Ethernet cables.
|
I am no proponent of pricey (especially monster) cables. But there are lots of examples of instances where digital signals can degrade over cables. One personal example I have was trying to get rid of sparklies on my hdtv introduced by a 50' (not so great) hdmi cable.
|
|
|
|
|
07-02-2010, 10:54 AM
|
#13
|
|
Franchise Player
|
So they're proposing data rates in excess of HDMI 1.3/1.4 (i.e. > 10 GBits/sec) along with PoE and 100 mbit ethernet using garden-variety Cat5e/Cat6? What I've seen also indicates you'd still need an HDBaseT-equipped receiver to function as a switch, which is essentially what HDMI does anyway. The primary benefit appears to be rolling your own (potentially long) cables and sticking them in a wall, but aside from projectors, I've rarely seen a setup where the sources are more than a few meters away from the TV. The 100W power transmission is more interesting; operating low-power TVs could be possible with a single cable. That's not useful for most people, but it could be interesting in commercial applications.
|
|
|
|
|
07-02-2010, 11:39 AM
|
#14
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Virginia
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob
So they're proposing data rates in excess of HDMI 1.3/1.4 (i.e. > 10 GBits/sec) along with PoE and 100 mbit ethernet using garden-variety Cat5e/Cat6? What I've seen also indicates you'd still need an HDBaseT-equipped receiver to function as a switch, which is essentially what HDMI does anyway. The primary benefit appears to be rolling your own (potentially long) cables and sticking them in a wall, but aside from projectors, I've rarely seen a setup where the sources are more than a few meters away from the TV. The 100W power transmission is more interesting; operating low-power TVs could be possible with a single cable. That's not useful for most people, but it could be interesting in commercial applications.
|
I'm struggling to see the practicality too.
I guess you could have one central receiver/server for the whole house, which would be pretty cool. Then you are stuck having to replace all the tvs and a/v receivers in your house though. Maybe some day down the road that would be useful. A solid wireless solution would probably be available by then, you'd think though.
I don't see what this offers that dlna wouldn't though?
|
|
|
|
|
07-02-2010, 11:56 AM
|
#15
|
|
The new goggles also do nothing.
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
|
10Gbit NICs are like $1000 each right now aren't they?
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
|
|
|
|
|
07-02-2010, 12:02 PM
|
#16
|
|
RANDOM USER TITLE CHANGE
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by photon
10Gbit NICs are like $1000 each right now aren't they?
|
Pretty much exactly that price. These are the ones we use at work:
https://shop.sun.com/store/productsa...9-080020a9ed93
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:06 AM.
|
|
