Quote:
Originally Posted by puckluck
It's pretty obvious from reading the article and specifically these two paragraphs that the fisherman were not happy with the way they were being treated and how they were being compensated. They went from doing the thing they love to do the most in fishing and ended up helping with the cleanup in the Gulf.
|
Okay, that's fair enough, but a rational person would likely look at it a totally different way.
1) I love fishing
2) Due to an oil spill I can no longer fish
3) Cleanup efforts are ongoing, and are necessare if the fishing industry is to rebound at some point in the future
4) I can get a job helping to clean up the oil, hence making up for lost income (either totally or in part) due to the oil spill, and can contribute to returning the area to normal and I can get back to the job I love
Now the compensation issue is another one alltogether, but there are certainly better ways to deal with that than offing yourself.
My guess is that the guy was likely predisposed to do something like this, and this was just the final straw.
Did BP/the oil spill contribute to his suicide? Sure.
Are they responsible for it? Probalby not, as contribute and responsible for are totally different things.