Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-19-2010, 04:37 PM   #1
alltherage
Missed the bus
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Question GST Rebate Question

Last year I received a tiny rebate and my (then) fiance still received a decent rebate for GST from Revenue Canada from tax year 2008.


Now we have a notice in the mail that since we are married (Sept 09) we no longer qualify because our household income is greater than the qualifying income, and have to pay it back.


Am I the only one who doesn’t understand this? In 2008 we weren’t married and qualified for a rebate- what does that have to do with getting married in 2009? Has anyone else had this happen? Seems fishy to me.
alltherage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2010, 04:54 PM   #2
username
Powerplay Quarterback
 
username's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

As far as I know that's normal.

You're in luck though; should one of you make more money than the other you can incorporate income splitting and save much more on your tax return than a gst rebate. That is of course if the individual making more money is in a higher tax bracket.
username is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2010, 07:23 PM   #3
DownhillGoat
Franchise Player
 
DownhillGoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Exp:
Default

Fishy, maybe, but that's how it works. GST rebates are based on household income, not individual. Because you're now married your combined income is what they base qualification on. The larger your family gets the more Rev Can screws you.

@username : I thought income splitting could only be used in retirement?
DownhillGoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2010, 10:44 PM   #4
ken0042
Playboy Mansion Poolboy
 
ken0042's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Close enough to make a beer run during a TV timeout
Exp:
Default

Same thing happened to us. My fiancee had to pay hers back. I think it was because the GST rebate was based on her being single for all of 2009, but because we became common law in 2009 she ended up owing her last GST cheque back.
ken0042 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2010, 09:20 AM   #5
Frank MetaMusil
RANDOM USER TITLE CHANGE
 
Frank MetaMusil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kunkstyle View Post
Fishy, maybe, but that's how it works. GST rebates are based on household income, not individual. Because you're now married your combined income is what they base qualification on. The larger your family gets the more Rev Can screws you.

@username : I thought income splitting could only be used in retirement?
Somewhat of a long post

Income Splitting Opportunities

  1. The higher income-earning spouse pays all of the family expenses that are not deductible, including the income taxes of the lower spouse. The lower income spouse then uses their income for investment.
  2. If a new business is started, allow lower income family members to acquire an equity position. Consult a professional for advice on structuring such an arrangement.
  3. If you own a business, employ your spouse or children and pay a reasonable salary.
  4. If the CRAs prescribed rate of interest is lower than investment yields, it may be beneficial to lend funds at the prescribed rate to a family member who reinvests the funds.
  5. Spousal RRSP’s have a limited potential for income splitting. The goal should be to ensure both spouses have the same income in retirement.
  6. Split your pension income with your spouse (see our article on Pension Income Splitting).
  7. Tuition fees do not have to be actually paid by the student to receive the tuition tax credit. A parent may pay the expense and the student may still claim the credit.
  8. If a related minor or spouse receives a gift or inheritance from a source that the income splitting rules would not have applied, the funds should be held in a separate account and “not” be used for household expenses.
  9. Property that has the potential to earn capital gains should be given to minor children rather than a spouse.
  10. If funds are given to a child in their 17th year and a term deposit is acquired where the interest will pay in their 18th year. The interest will be tax in their hands in the following year
  11. If a child has employment income, lending funds up to an amount to which they would earn from employment, interest free, will free the child’s employment income to earn investment income. The funds lent would then be used for their own purchases.
  12. Income earned from Canada child tax benefit payments invested in the child’s name will not be attributed.
Frank MetaMusil is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:22 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy