Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-06-2010, 10:02 PM   #81
Shazam
Franchise Player
 
Shazam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memento Mori
Exp:
Default

Not sure if they do this still, but students that got good grades often got part or all of their student loans remissed.
__________________
If you don't pass this sig to ten of your friends, you will become an Oilers fan.
Shazam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2010, 11:07 PM   #82
CaramonLS
Retired
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheyCallMeBruce View Post
Not in this day and age. $56k is only slightly above average. You'e qouting figures that are 6 years old. Everything has gone up. Mortgages, rent, even groceries and a bowl of pho. In 2004, how hard was it to get a $600 mortgage?
Unless you're an engineer, most new grads don't touch near 56k. Just about any BA, BFA, BComm and some BScs start well below that mark. Well below.
CaramonLS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2010, 11:12 PM   #83
CaramonLS
Retired
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG View Post
My favourite solution to Doctor shortages would be to drastically increase the number of spots available for doctors but at the same time set the tuition to approach the cost of educating the doctor.
Actually, they've got a cheaper, alternative solution at hand.

We've got a number of qualified (or just barely under qualified) doctors who are working in jobs out of their field because the equivalency tests required to get their certification are keeping them out of the market. Just head on down to your local grocery to see security guards who have optometrist qualifications from India, but can't afford to take the tests and/or additional courses.

That's how we're going to have to solve this problem.
CaramonLS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2010, 01:31 AM   #84
wooohooo
#1 Goaltender
 
wooohooo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG View Post
My favourite solution to Doctor shortages would be to drastically increase the number of spots available for doctors but at the same time set the tuition to approach the cost of educating the doctor.

Instead of scholorships you provide forgiveable interest free loans for large protions of the tuition. If after 10 years the Doctor is still in the province/country the loans could partially be forgiven.

Really I think most post-secondary education should be funded in this manner. If you leave the country you should have to pay back the gov's contribution to your education.
I think they have something in place like that. Not to this extent but more so in the rural areas to attract doctors.
wooohooo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2010, 03:54 PM   #85
DrJ
Powerplay Quarterback
 
DrJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Sorry to bump...U of C officially admitted 170 students. This is only a 10 student cut from last year. U of A, as far as I know, have not released the "final" amount of students but there were much more significant cuts there.

Edit: U of A admitted 21 less for a total of 167.

Last edited by DrJ; 05-15-2010 at 06:14 PM.
DrJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2010, 03:58 PM   #86
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Wow, a story from the Left leaning Edmonton Journal was biased against the conservative government in exaggerating the numbers - I am amazed
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2010, 05:03 PM   #87
missdpuck
Franchise Player
 
missdpuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: At the Gates of Hell
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shazam View Post
Reading the last issue of Moneysense, they describe a retiring couple that both worked for the federal government for thirty years, thus getting their full pension, which works out to $120K a year, indexed for inflation. That's about $3 million in PV. They're also retiring at 55.

DB pensions are gold-plated.
Holy crap. Now I understand the comment about Canadian govt workers not having to save for retirement.What are the terms for lower paying jobs?
Our governemnt retirement system has changed from something called CSRS (civil service) to FERS (federal employees retirement). The latter is a combination of social security and a thrift savings plan (contributions matched by govt). There was an opportunity several years ago to switch from the CSRS to the FERS. Most who did --that I know personally--regret it and did so long before the crash of the economy. And most CSRS people are busy getting their social security quarters in so they'll be able to get that too. Even though it wouldn't be much.

But now I'm more confused than ever about the Canadian health care system.

And here we also have something called the Earned Income Credit..a tax break for those who, as the ad says, "don't make much money". The cutoff is $48,000.
__________________
http://arc4raptors.org

Last edited by missdpuck; 05-15-2010 at 05:07 PM.
missdpuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2010, 05:58 PM   #88
jolinar of malkshor
#1 Goaltender
 
jolinar of malkshor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikey_the_redneck View Post
For what nurses get paid..........they should be worked hard.
Yup attack the hard working public service. I can't stand people like you who feel the need to attack these type of people.
jolinar of malkshor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2010, 06:55 PM   #89
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

I'm kinda thinking that the reason nurses get paid so much is because there is such a huge demand for them.

Public or private sector, high demand should equal higher salary.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Azure For This Useful Post:
Old 05-15-2010, 07:22 PM   #90
Devils'Advocate
#1 Goaltender
 
Devils'Advocate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by missdpuck View Post
Holy crap. Now I understand the comment about Canadian govt workers not having to save for retirement.What are the terms for lower paying jobs?
If you work 35 years, you get 70% of your salary. Which is what I plan on doing. And yes, I put a paltry amount away into RRSPs because that pension should cover my retirement. But I also have an enormous sum taken out of my paycheque every pay day to go into that pension fund.

I have worked in both private and public institutions. I did very well when I was working as a consultant for a business company. They offered me a huge sum to join them full time. I decided to take LESS MONEY to work for the Canadian federal government. Why take a job that pays less? Job security and a good pension plan. Those two things right there attract good people.
Devils'Advocate is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:38 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy