| 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-07-2010, 04:09 PM | #1 |  
	| tromboner 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: where the lattes are      | 
				 Conservatives introduce mandatory sentencing for 5 marijuana plants 
 
			
			Since the 4/20 thread was so "fun", I'm surprised nobody mentioned this yet. (Or if they did, I didn't see it. Sorry.)http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/bre...-92625814.html 
	Quote: 
	
		| Justice Minister Rob Nicholson dropped broad hints Sunday that the new  legislation would revive a controversial provision — a mandatory  six-month sentence for people convicted of growing as few as five pot  plants. |  
Downloading, pot... they sure seem to like imposing disproportionate penalties for (mostly) harmless fun.
 
FWIW, I've never consumed marijuana beyond second-hand smoke, and I am against this bill.
 
Have at 'er!
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-07-2010, 04:10 PM | #2 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Lethbridge      | 
 
			
			It's all about the money....
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-07-2010, 04:14 PM | #3 |  
	| tromboner 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: where the lattes are      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by mikey_the_redneck  It's all about the money.... |  
Yeah, it costs money to put people in jail.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-07-2010, 04:17 PM | #4 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: SW      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by mikey_the_redneck  It's all about creating a climate of FEAR.... |  
fyp.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-07-2010, 04:18 PM | #5 |  
	|  Posted the 6 millionth post ! | 
 
			
			We will stand tall, and stoned, against this bill.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to Ozy_Flame For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-07-2010, 04:20 PM | #6 |  
	| Norm! | 
 
			
			Its not going to pass anyways.  The conservatives will be able to go back to their core support and say we tried to be harder on drugs, but we couldn't push it through.
 It ain't going to happen.
 
				__________________My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
 
 Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to CaptainCrunch For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-07-2010, 04:26 PM | #7 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Calgary      | 
 
			
			I'm not sure I get what the problem is. Growing marijiuana is part of drug traffiking no? Harsher penalties may help deter criminal and gang activities.  Why would anyone be against this?
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to The Yen Man For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-07-2010, 04:27 PM | #8 |  
	| #1 Goaltender | 
 
			
			Conservatives will pass any bill that makes them get richer. Hell most politicians do no matter the party.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-07-2010, 04:29 PM | #9 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: May 2006 Location: @HOOT250      | 
 
			
			Murders get less time in Canada.
		 
				__________________ 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by henriksedin33  Not at all, as I've said, I would rather  start with LA over any of the other WC playoff teams.  Bunch of  underachievers who look good on paper but don't even deserve to be in  the playoffs. |  |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-07-2010, 04:33 PM | #10 |  
	| First Line Centre 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Brisbane, Australia      | 
 
			
			I don't know much about this stuff, so I'll ask some of the posters who know more...  what's a reasonable number of plants for personal use?  Yeah, I'm looking at you HOOT.
 Basically, I couldn't care less if people grow for themselves, but if you've got a grow op, you're bringing all the associated criminal crap along with it, so you should go to gaol.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-07-2010, 04:34 PM | #11 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: CGY      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by The Yen Man  I'm not sure I get what the problem is. Growing marijiuana is part of drug traffiking no? Harsher penalties may help deter criminal and gang activities. Why would anyone be against this? |  
The disproportionate amount of resources (tax money) spent on something that has a very minimal effect on society.
		 
				__________________
 So far, this is the oldest I've been.
 
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-07-2010, 04:35 PM | #12 |  
	| Had an idea! | 
 
			
			Yeah, lets waste time on stupid bills like this.
 If you want to get tough on crime, you get tough on bad crimes.  Not petty stuff like this.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to Azure For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-07-2010, 04:52 PM | #13 |  
	| Powerplay Quarterback 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Chair      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by The Yen Man  I'm not sure I get what the problem is. Growing marijiuana is part of drug traffiking no? Harsher penalties may help deter criminal and gang activities. Why would anyone be against this? |  
Legalization would be a much better way of taking away from the drug dealers' earnings. Unfortunately, most politicians make decisions based on seemingly arbitrary criteria instead of any reasonable methods when it comes to drugs.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-07-2010, 04:56 PM | #14 |  
	| GOAT! | 
 
			
			Going after downloaders and pot smokers. Talk about a sure way to make sure you don't get re-elected.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-07-2010, 04:56 PM | #15 |  
	| First Line Centre 
				 
				Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Calgary      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by The Yen Man  I'm not sure I get what the problem is. Growing marijiuana is part of drug traffiking no? Harsher penalties may help deter criminal and gang activities.  Why would anyone be against this? |  
Because passing bills that make punishments stiffer does not have the desired effect. The harder and harder the government pushes on drugs the further under ground it gets. Look no further than the states for a country that spends ridiculous amounts on money to keep drugs out of their country and yet they still have a very huge drug issue down there.
 
If the government wanted to do something productive for once they would start regulating pot and underselling the dealers. You'd be taking money from drug dealers and gangs and putting it into tax payers pockets.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-07-2010, 05:00 PM | #16 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Memento Mori      | 
 
			
			The Conservatives are pretty conservative, socially. 
Come on, vote Liberal.  Your pot addiction wants to, your wallet doesn't   
				__________________If you don't pass this sig to ten of your friends, you will become an Oilers fan.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-07-2010, 05:06 PM | #17 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			If only the government would focus on fixing the already lax penalties for other serious crimes instead of wasting time introducing BS laws like this.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-07-2010, 05:08 PM | #18 |  
	| UnModerator 
				 
				Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: North Vancouver, British Columbia.      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by FanIn80  Going after downloaders and pot smokers. Talk about a sure way to make sure you don't get re-elected. |  
Sounds like the Conservative MO.
 
Wait for Liberals to screw up. Check 
Hold sway for a few years. Check 
 it up and spend ten years trying to figure out how you managed that. In progress.
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by The Yen Man  I'm not sure I get what the problem is. Growing marijiuana is part of drug traffiking no? Harsher penalties may help deter criminal and gang activities. Why would anyone be against this? |  
Growing five plants is not going to be enough to make any sort of profit for the person selling it. In all likelyhood is is entirely for personal use and will simply clog up the justice system with "criminals" who were a threat to society because they wanted to light up and grow a garden for personal use.
		 
				__________________  THANK MR DEMKO
CPHL Ottawa Vancouver
				 Last edited by Blaster86; 05-07-2010 at 05:11 PM.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-07-2010, 05:30 PM | #19 |  
	| tromboner 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: where the lattes are      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Shazam  Come on, vote Liberal.  Your pot addiction wants to, your wallet doesn't   |  
Actually your wallet does. Spending ballooned under the Conservatives, even before the downturn.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-07-2010, 06:45 PM | #20 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Lethbridge      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by The Yen Man  I'm not sure I get what the problem is. Growing marijiuana is part of drug traffiking no? Harsher penalties may help deter criminal and gang activities. Why would anyone be against this? |  
5 plants??
  
For some property owners in certain areas (B.C. for example), you could literally have 5 plants growing on your acreage unknowingly.....
  
Beside that, I am guessing that 5 plants sounds more like a personal crop and not for trafficking purposes..
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:41 AM. | 
 
 
 |