CP Jihad to help my mom out! She won the grand prize! - Page 20 - Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

ResAlien · 03-02-2010, 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conscience

I am hoping you username doesn't apply to your IQ

You have mad multi quote skills. Wells done. Also, too bad so sad your horse in this race lost. CP comes though with the win, deal with it.

BurningYears · 03-02-2010, 11:35 PM

I'm pretty sure the average age in here doesn't classify us as kids either!

Conscience · 03-02-2010, 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimmy Stang
I have my browser set to automatically delete my cache and cookies each time I exit. Is that cheating? I use 4 or 5 different computers a day. Is that cheating?

When the rules state "one vote per day per person" Hmmmm..... Yes i think it is cheating, what do you think?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimmy Stang
They WANT people to go there repeatedly and to vote often.

pretty sure they didn't. But you are correct about the visibility point. Not so sure they enjoyed the Pillsbury bashing thet took on this forum though.

FlameCity · 03-02-2010, 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conscience

I am hoping you username doesn't apply to your IQ

I find it hilarious that you come on here, call people kids, chastise them for their voting morals and then post this kind of a comment . . . you call the others on here kids . . . where exactly is your maturity level at?

BurningYears · 03-02-2010, 11:38 PM

Hoo-Hoo!

hellofriends · 03-02-2010, 11:38 PM

If it says "one vote per day per person" and they dont have a program or something set up to prevent this its their fault.

Especially since the voting is done over the internet.

krazycanuck · 03-02-2010, 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conscience

I am hoping you username doesn't apply to your IQ

Last edited by Conscience; 03-02-2010 at 11:32 PM. Reason: spelling error

Now that's funny!

ResAlien · 03-02-2010, 11:39 PM

Conscience, I love you. You're my favourite single thread troll ever. Can I keep you under my couch and take you out to show family and friends when we need something cute to talk about?

Conscience · 03-02-2010, 11:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Drury18
And while you didn't personally, can you speak for those you have asked to help you in this? The OP didn't ask us to cheat. People acted on their own free will, much like I'm sure people did on your behalf. I'm sure your friends, family, coworkers and recipe site also voted in a less then one per person way.

You bring up some good points. How do you control what others do on the internet. Pillsbury found out the hard way that trust is definately not the way to go. I vetted (quick kids look it up on google) every vote made for me with in reason. KC did the same he just did it in a different manner. He condoned the cheating. I did not. Had anybody placed 200 votes for me in one session I would have asked Pillsnury to remove the votes (see concience)

Quote:

Originally Posted by KevanGuy
Fortunately we can fill it with a new kitchen suite.

Good point

.

HPLovecraft · 03-02-2010, 11:43 PM

I hate Pillsbury. I hope they go out of business!

HOOT · 03-02-2010, 11:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conscience

Nothing is hard about the final choice. As I pointed out it's the process you as a collective group took. You openly cheated. Pillsbury was clear about the rules yet you flagrently broke them. And none of you have an issue with this. I can see your colective thinking: "The end justified the means" KC's mom should have been kicked out on Dec 19. Pillsbury was/is mortified of legal/marketing issues to do with the contest. What started with a simple fun contest turned into a marketing nightmare. Made worse by a bunch of self- serving self-centered morally bankrupt (yes all of you) kids.

If it was as big of an issue as you say she would have been removed from the contest. Go whine about this back at your other forum we really don't care.

Drury18 · 03-02-2010, 11:44 PM

Just don't ask her to cook for you. Obviously she hasn't got that skill down or she would have won!

Drury18 · 03-02-2010, 11:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conscience

Had anybody placed 200 votes for me in one session I would have asked Pillsnury to remove the votes (see concience)

Anyone else BS detector just blow up?

And its Pillsbury and Conscience. This concience comes up showing some thread with an angry troll and losing a cooking contest.

Conscience · 03-02-2010, 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlameCity
I find it hilarious that you come on here, call people kids, chastise them for their voting morals and then post this kind of a comment . . . you call the others on here kids . . . where exactly is your maturity level at?

Do I need to print what KC said on the other thread at PC linked to earlier. Lucky me I put on my extra thick flame retartened suit.

Somebody metioned Troll

Quote:

Originally Posted by ResAlien
You're my favourite single thread troll ever.

Just came to make a point. I hate when somebody says I cheated.

Conscience · 03-02-2010, 11:49 PM

KC, I see you showed. Any chance mom want's to visit?

FiftyBelow · 03-02-2010, 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conscience

I am hoping you username doesn't apply to your IQ

Perhaps I didn't understand the actual process of the voting procedures since I didn't actually participate. But I was under the impression that prior to the reset.. all the various vote-enhancing mechanisms were not protected against. Only after the reset did they make it more difficult to bypass the one-vote per day rule? If not, I retract my statement.

Regardless, the results were judged anyways.

ResAlien · 03-02-2010, 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conscience

Do I need to print what KC said on the other thread at PC linked to earlier. Lucky me I put on my extra thick flame retartened suit.

Somebody metioned Troll

Just came to make a point. I hate when somebody says I cheated.

No one said you cheated champ. I like you. I hope you stick around. Also, we discuss hockey on the FoI side, come on over! It's going to be fun.

Drury18 · 03-02-2010, 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conscience

Just came to make a point. I hate when somebody says I cheated.

You signed up for an account to prove you didn't cheat in a contest you didn't win? You should change your name to "CaptainObvious". Except its taken.

SteveToms · 03-02-2010, 11:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conscience

Do I need to print what KC said on the other thread at PC linked to earlier. Lucky me I put on my extra thick flame ######ed suit.

Somebody metioned Troll

Just came to make a point. I hate when somebody says I cheated.

Are you Russian or perhaps even Ron Wilson's mom. It would explain the sour grapes.

Jimmy Stang · 03-02-2010, 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conscience

When the rules state "one vote per day per person" Hmmmm..... Yes i think it is cheating, what do you think?

pretty sure they didn't. But you are correct about the visibility point. Not so sure they enjoyed the Pillsbury bashing thet took on this forum though.

Pillsbury messed up. The people responsible for this debacle of an internet contest didn't implement a way to ensure that voting was authenticated. Oops. Lesson learned, and perhaps next time they'll do a better job. Or maybe they won't. Asking people to authenticate themselves will turn people away. Less eyes on the site. Less lucrative stats to show their advertisters/sponsors.

Their PR people surely didn't want the bad publicity of banning someone from the contest for doing exactly what they wanted them to do - beg for votes. It is about hits, ad impressions, branding, word of mouth. Do you really think that Pillsbury cares who wins the contest? They just want their brand and their sponsors' brands shown. Over, and over, and over again.

And get this - I didn't even vote in the contest. Not my style. I'm just finding the fallout a little amusing. Anyway, this "kid" has a big day of putting his degree to use and can't be worried about tears shed over a Pillsbury contest...