Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum > Tech Talk
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-14-2010, 01:55 PM   #21
Igottago
Franchise Player
 
Igottago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

I see a lot of technical stuff I dont understand here, but a good thread.

My question is this: would 120 hz be worth the extra money, compared to a 60 hz tv? Am I going to be screwed in a year once 120 hz becomes more useful?

I'm currently watching a Toshiba 26" 720P LCD Hdtv, a few years old. I notice no blur on any gaming or hockey that I watch.

But now Im looking to upgrade to a larger set. There are some good looking prices out there for 60 hz tv's. I'm not sure 120 hz would really do anything for me. I mean how much better is the hockey game going to be? I can already follow the action fine on a 3 year old hdtv.
__________________
A few weeks after crashing head-first into the boards (denting his helmet and being unable to move for a little while) following a hit from behind by Bob Errey, the Calgary Flames player explains:

"I was like Christ, lying on my back, with my arms outstretched, crucified"
-- Frank Musil - Early January 1994
Igottago is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 02:17 PM   #22
Pastiche
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Enil Angus
Exp:
Default

Definitely buy 120hz. 60hz will not be 3d compatible.
Pastiche is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 02:24 PM   #23
nfotiu
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Virginia
Exp:
Default

Only 3d compatible 120 hz tvs are capable of 3d.
nfotiu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 02:48 PM   #24
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

I bought my tv a year ago when 120hz was just too expensive. Now however, I would definitely wouldn't by a set without 120hz. Buying 60hz is somewhat like buying 780 instead of 1080.

I'm not sure I would take 3d into consideration into anything just yet....the stuff out there is really expensive, and very 1st generation quality. Unless you're an early adopter with tons of cash, I'd stay away. As a guy who multitasks while watching tv, I'm also not a fan of having to wear special glasses at home.
Table 5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 05:20 PM   #25
OBCT
Powerplay Quarterback
 
OBCT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Medicine Hat
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nufy View Post
So I looked up the specs on mine...

See here

http://reviews.cnet.com/flat-panel-t....html?tag=rnav

LDC Refresh Rate - 60Hz
Pixel Response Time - 6mS

Is that above or below average in terms of availability.
Comparing those specs to all new TVs being sold in stores right now, and I'd say a little below average. Most LCDs are striving for response times of 5ms or less these days. Plasmas are even less. Also, most new LCDs are featuring either 120 or 240Hz refresh rate.

I wouldn't say that your TV is necessarily a poor performer, but as with all things electronic, it's technology has become a little outdated in the last year or two. I have a TV that's similar to yours and love it; the subjective enjoyment test is a larger factor than any specification, IMO.
__________________
OBCT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 05:52 PM   #26
kukkudo
#1 Goaltender
 
kukkudo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Samsung 52 inch B610
http://www.futureshop.ca/catalog/pro...0122284&catid=

It was $1470 during boxing week

http://www.futureshop.ca/catalog/pro...0121816&catid=

It was $1399 during boxing week

http://www.futureshop.ca/catalog/pro...0120300&catid=

It was $1499 during boxing week

These are all great tv's for 120hz, the prices have gone up since boxing week. The Samsung and LG are the ones that stand out spec wise. I have seen the LG in person at a friends house and its amazing. The samsung should be no different, the Sony is alright, but overpriced.
kukkudo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 05:54 PM   #27
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nfotiu View Post
Only 3d compatible 120 hz tvs are capable of 3d.
yeah, from what i understand ony 120hz TVs that can accept a 120hz signal will be 3D compatible. Most ot the LCD tVs out today, even though they do 120hz, do not accept a 120hz signal. A few 3D computer monitors are out now for gaming. .
if you look around.

Plasmas are another story and some 3D plasnas are coming this year also.

sorry not use to tyyping on my laptop yet.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2010, 02:44 PM   #28
Shazam
Franchise Player
 
Shazam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memento Mori
Exp:
Default

I'm waiting for 2400Hz.
__________________
If you don't pass this sig to ten of your friends, you will become an Oilers fan.
Shazam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2010, 10:08 AM   #29
Nufy
Franchise Player
 
Nufy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Exp:
Default

What would be (if any) the difference in moving to a plasma over the LCD I currently have.
__________________
Nufy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2010, 10:42 AM   #30
nickerjones
Franchise Player
 
nickerjones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Oklahoma - Where they call a puck a ball...
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nufy View Post
What would be (if any) the difference in moving to a plasma over the LCD I currently have.
I dunno what plasma you have.... compared to the LCD and plasma I have... the Plasma is not as bright as the LCD but its a better picture overall
nickerjones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2010, 10:54 AM   #31
sa226
#1 Goaltender
 
sa226's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Back in Calgary!!
Exp:
Default

When buying TV's these days, you've probably heard it before but it all comes down to your own preferences and budget.

If you have the desire to get the latest and greatest and have a decent budget. By all mean the new 120hz and 240 hz LCD's are the new thing....or the new LED's as well.

But most people are on a budget. So it comes down to what looks best to you. I just bought a new 40 inch samsung lcd. I was trying to decide between an identically priced plasma and the samsung. At the end of the day I just didn't like the look of the plasma. They are more suited to Darker home theatre rooms as they pick up a lot of glare. So I went with the LCD.

Spec wise, the biggest decision is the refresh rates. The higher ones are definitely better. I watched a 120hz tv for a while and you could really see the difference. Someone compared it to a soap opera, and its true it has that weird "look" to it.

But the 60hz tvs were just fine with me, its still a nice clear picture. Once you get that 60hz tv home, unless you are watching it side by side with a 120 or a 240, you will like it just the same.

Also you really can't be sure about a tv until you bring it home and set it up, so as long as you don't mind packing and unpacking a few tv's, those 30 day return policies are your friend.
sa226 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:15 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy