Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Leagues and Games > Calgarypuck Hockey League
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-04-2010, 08:45 PM   #1
MJK
Franchise Player
 
MJK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: N/A
Exp:
Default Breaking News - Kane Sent Packing

Breaking News: Eh Oh Canada Go News

Patrick Kane's stay with the Columbus Blue Jackets was short lived as he has been traded to the Philadelphia Flyers. Details are sketchy but the deal broke down as follows:

To Philly: Patrick Kane

To Columbus: Tomas Vanek, Ryan Whitney, 1st(det) 2010
MJK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2010, 08:49 PM   #2
Da_Chief
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2007
Exp:
Default

Heavy price to pay but with Kane having a career year, us having an extra dman and boatload of 1st rounders, I needed to make this deal.

This deal will also provide some much needed cap relief for next year.

Vanek and Whitney were both playing well in philly but been afraid to make a trade and this was no different.

Good luck to Vanek and Whitney in Columbus.
Da_Chief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2010, 08:50 PM   #3
Knut
 
Knut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

Wow!!!!

Did a first really need to be in there?
Knut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2010, 08:53 PM   #4
MJK
Franchise Player
 
MJK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: N/A
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesla View Post
Wow!!!!

Did a first really need to be in there?
Yes or Kane would still be in Blue Jacket.
MJK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2010, 08:56 PM   #5
CMPunk
aka Spike
 
CMPunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The Darkest Corners of My Mind
Exp:
Default

Flyers are always willing to overpay for a guy they want
CMPunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2010, 09:02 PM   #6
Swayze11
something else haha
 
Swayze11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Exp:
Default

Nice work guys. Way to get full value + more for Kane.

With Kane's contract at 1.35 for the next 3 years I can see why the Flyers paid the price. top 3 contract in the CPHL by far.
__________________

Swayze11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2010, 09:06 PM   #7
Enforcer
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Exp:
Default

5 reasons why this is a bad deal for Columbus

1. The most important player in the deal; Vanek, is having a lousy year. Only 11 goals in 36 games. Has to get seriously hot just to hit 30.
2. Ryan Whitney is good, but won't be great. If I'm trading a player like Kane who makes almost nothing in salary, I would have demanded Erik Johnson.
3. Took on almost 8 million dollars. Obviously the Flyers gave cheese money for this year, but that's going to cause trouble next summer with all the deadwood that has to be bought out. Also Vanek needs a new contract this summer. If he actually does bounce back and kept the same OV rating he has now, he costs 6.5, 7 or 7.5.
4. There were better draft picks available.
5. You traded Patrick Kane, a 70 OV player on an entry level deal, you automatically lose for not keeping and building around him.
Enforcer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2010, 09:11 PM   #8
Da_Chief
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enforcer View Post
5 reasons why this is a bad deal for Columbus

1. The most important player in the deal; Vanek, is having a lousy year. Only 11 goals in 36 games. Has to get seriously hot just to hit 30.
2. Ryan Whitney is good, but won't be great. If I'm trading a player like Kane who makes almost nothing in salary, I would have demanded Erik Johnson.
3. Took on almost 8 million dollars. Obviously the Flyers gave cheese money for this year, but that's going to cause trouble next summer with all the deadwood that has to be bought out. Also Vanek needs a new contract this summer. If he actually does bounce back and kept the same OV rating he has now, he costs 6.5, 7 or 7.5.
4. There were better draft picks available.
5. You traded Patrick Kane, a 70 OV player on an entry level deal, you automatically lose for not keeping and building around him.
Reasons 1 and 3, this could be a blessing for the jackets, him having a lousy year, get him on a good deal, hes shown what hes capable of and he will turn it around.

Reason 2, EJ is not moving
Reason 4, he had the option of choosing wings, oilers, flyers, blues pick. The bruins and leafs picks were not made available, he tired though.

Reason 5, its actually fun making a trade and trying to improve your team. Not everyone has a team full of future hall of famers.
Da_Chief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2010, 09:14 PM   #9
MJK
Franchise Player
 
MJK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: N/A
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enforcer View Post
5 reasons why this is a bad deal for Columbus

1. The most important player in the deal; Vanek, is having a lousy year. Only 11 goals in 36 games. Has to get seriously hot just to hit 30.
2. Ryan Whitney is good, but won't be great. If I'm trading a player like Kane who makes almost nothing in salary, I would have demanded Erik Johnson.
3. Took on almost 8 million dollars. Obviously the Flyers gave cheese money for this year, but that's going to cause trouble next summer with all the deadwood that has to be bought out. Also Vanek needs a new contract this summer. If he actually does bounce back and kept the same OV rating he has now, he costs 6.5, 7 or 7.5.
4. There were better draft picks available.
5. You traded Patrick Kane, a 70 OV player on an entry level deal, you automatically lose for not keeping and building around him.
have you seen me build a team before? Waiting and building arond one player takes too long. I will build a good team and won't need Kane to do it. You'll see.
MJK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2010, 09:20 PM   #10
Sylvanfan
Appealing my suspension
 
Sylvanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Just outside Enemy Lines
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enforcer View Post
5 reasons why this is a bad deal for Columbus

1. The most important player in the deal; Vanek, is having a lousy year. Only 11 goals in 36 games. Has to get seriously hot just to hit 30.
2. Ryan Whitney is good, but won't be great. If I'm trading a player like Kane who makes almost nothing in salary, I would have demanded Erik Johnson.
3. Took on almost 8 million dollars. Obviously the Flyers gave cheese money for this year, but that's going to cause trouble next summer with all the deadwood that has to be bought out. Also Vanek needs a new contract this summer. If he actually does bounce back and kept the same OV rating he has now, he costs 6.5, 7 or 7.5.
4. There were better draft picks available.
5. You traded Patrick Kane, a 70 OV player on an entry level deal, you automatically lose for not keeping and building around him.
Seriously? I can't expect anyone will trade with you if those are your demands, they're insane. Erik Johnson and Patrick Kane are pretty close to equals as players. In the SIM Kane may have more value given that he's a forward who's pretty much close to his peak rating.

Columbus is close to the playoff mix and they instantly gained a similar rated forward, a guy who'll be a top 3 defenceman for them, plus the pick. Not everyone of us treat these teams as a decade long pet project, so trying to win now is worth it.

Flyers pay a pretty good price to get Kane, but they can afford it. Jackets move out the best long term asset, but gain back depth that they did lack.
__________________
"Some guys like old balls"
Patriots QB Tom Brady
Sylvanfan is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sylvanfan For This Useful Post:
Old 01-04-2010, 09:23 PM   #11
Flickered Flame
Lifetime Suspension
 
Flickered Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Strathmore
Exp:
Default

It was only a matter of time until Dave pulled the trigger on a big deal. Yeah he has made a couple of other deals but this is the type of deal that Dave loves to make, and Dave well done once again!
Flickered Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2010, 10:05 PM   #12
Prototype
 
Prototype's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: @robdashjamieson
Exp:
Default

I guess your offer is off the table, huh Joe?
__________________
Prototype is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2010, 10:36 PM   #13
Mango
Marshmallow Maiden
 
Mango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I appreciate that Dave is always willing to take a chance. Kudos to both GMs for cranking this puppy out.
Mango is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2010, 10:46 PM   #14
I wanna be like Miikka
#1 Goaltender
 
I wanna be like Miikka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I like this more for the Jackets. Cap is worth something but not this much. Vanek is a star player, Whitney is a good Dman who can score which is more valuable in the sim. A 1st to add also is great.

Kane has a great contract but besides that Im not sure he is much better then Vanek in the sim. Add on top of that Whitney and a 1st and I think the Jackets made out well by selling Kane to someone who really cares about the name.
I wanna be like Miikka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2010, 09:23 AM   #15
MJK
Franchise Player
 
MJK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: N/A
Exp:
Default

I can shed a bit of light on this trade now that it is not 2AM. The reason for the deal is very simple. I have always been a big fan of Vanek and everyone knows what he is capable of.

Is he playing up to par in the NHL this year? NO
If he was, would I get Whitney and a 1st included with him in the deal? NO

The bottom line is that I am taking advantage of Vanek's poor NHL play to make a deal here. I will hope that he steps it up eventually and I think he will.

I build a team by selling off my best assets to obtain more, in most cases in a 2-1 deal.

Overall I think it is a good deal and the trade talks went very well.
MJK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2010, 10:01 AM   #16
Hanna Sniper
Franchise Player
 
Hanna Sniper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Exp:
Default

I like this deal for the CPHL!
__________________
2018 OHL CHAMPIONS
2022 OHL CHAMPIONS
Hanna Sniper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2010, 10:12 AM   #17
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Great job GMs... I love watching teams like the Jackets rebuild / retool.

As for the trade I am betting the Jackets GM is looking to obtain assets that have value. He will take each piece and trade them again and again and again.
flambers is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to flambers For This Useful Post:
MJK
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:42 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy