10-23-2009, 01:49 PM
|
#1
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Victoria, BC
|
Windows 7 on a MacBook 5.1 - 32 or 64 bit?
It's only 40 bucks....Why the hell not?
|
|
|
10-23-2009, 01:57 PM
|
#2
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SW calgary
|
I use the 64 bit on my Macbook pro with boot Camp. it runs great, and the official boot camp support isn't even out yet. Which macbook is it? (Confirm it can run the 64b kernel)
|
|
|
10-23-2009, 02:27 PM
|
#3
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Victoria, BC
|
The specs are as follows:
MacBook 5.1
2.4 GHz Duo Core 2
2 GB RAM
|
|
|
10-23-2009, 02:48 PM
|
#4
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SW calgary
|
By Duo Core 2 i assume you mean Core 2 Duo
then yes, 64 bit.(especially if you plan upgrading RAM in future)
|
|
|
10-23-2009, 02:48 PM
|
#5
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
|
Sand Leopard is so much better than Windows though. Why would you ever want to install Windows?
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
|
|
|
10-23-2009, 03:31 PM
|
#6
|
First Line Centre
|
How much hd space would boot camp and Windows 7 take up?
|
|
|
10-23-2009, 03:34 PM
|
#7
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SW calgary
|
Well you get to decide how much HD space you want to partition for Boot Camp. If you do not want to partition, rather virtualize, look into software such as Vmware Fusion or Parallels, which runs Windows as a guest host inside Mac OS X.
Myself, took out a 80GB partition on Win 7 64 bit. (I also virtualize it, for classes that need just 1 program - you can run your boot camp partition as a guest host as well)
|
|
|
10-23-2009, 03:56 PM
|
#8
|
GOAT!
|
I'm in the middle of playing around with Parallels. I've been a VM Fusion guy for the last couple years, but now I'm trying out Parallels. I don't really have a verdict quite yet.
As for the 32 vs 64 thing...
To simplify things for you, ask yourself if you're willing to spend money on upgrading to 4GB of RAM. If the answer is yes, and you have access to a 64bit Windows 7 install, then do it. If the answer is no, then stick with 32bit.
|
|
|
10-23-2009, 04:04 PM
|
#9
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SW calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FanIn80
I'm in the middle of playing around with Parallels. I've been a VM Fusion guy for the last couple years, but now I'm trying out Parallels. I don't really have a verdict quite yet.
As for the 32 vs 64 thing...
To simplify things for you, ask yourself if you're willing to spend money on upgrading to 4GB of RAM. If the answer is yes, and you have access to a 64bit Windows 7 install, then do it. If the answer is no, then stick with 32bit.
|
The new VMware being released on October 27th crushes Parallels. I own both, and beta'd the new VMware, and am now using the RC for it. Its speed is VERY very good.
|
|
|
10-23-2009, 04:11 PM
|
#10
|
GOAT!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by silentsim
The new VMware being released on October 27th crushes Parallels. I own both, and beta'd the new VMware, and am now using the RC for it. Its speed is VERY very good.
|
Yikes. I downloaded a beta version of VM 3, and it sucked. It was slow and prodding and unusable. I'm hoping I just downloaded an old beta copy or something, because that's what made me start looking at Parallels in the first place.
|
|
|
10-23-2009, 05:11 PM
|
#11
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SW calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FanIn80
Yikes. I downloaded a beta version of VM 3, and it sucked. It was slow and prodding and unusable. I'm hoping I just downloaded an old beta copy or something, because that's what made me start looking at Parallels in the first place.
|
Hmm
Im using Version 3.0.0 build 193526
|
|
|
10-23-2009, 07:24 PM
|
#12
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SW calgary
|
Also to note, the newest Parallels build does not support DX, so Windows Aero does not function. Word is that it is in the Parallels 5.0 build, which will compete with the features of VmWare 3.0 (Aero capable support)
|
|
|
10-23-2009, 07:42 PM
|
#13
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SW calgary
|
Another thing, found out Parallels 5 beta is public, so I will test it and compare. will post my thoughts once i get some hannds on
|
|
|
10-23-2009, 07:47 PM
|
#14
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Just installed 7 Pro in Fusion 2.0.6, and everything works well. No Aero support right now, but that is coming with version 3.0 on the 27th.
As for why I did it, I have some vbscript and powershell work I need to do, and its annoying working remotely via RDP or Citrix. I gave myself a 32 gig virtual C: partition, seems like plenty if MacOS is your primary gig and hold all your documents and whatnot. From what I've experienced so far, 1 gig is enough RAM for acceptable Win7 performance in a VM.
__________________
-Scott
|
|
|
10-23-2009, 09:54 PM
|
#15
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Victoria, BC
|
I like having Windows on my computer for a few reasons. I don't mind the OS to be honest. I figure for $52 I'll see what MS has to offer.
Other World Computing has 4 GB memory upgrade for $90. I'll probably do that before I install Windows 7.
http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/memor...o/Upgrade/DDR3
|
|
|
10-23-2009, 10:17 PM
|
#16
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SW calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HotHotHeat
I like having Windows on my computer for a few reasons. I don't mind the OS to be honest. I figure for $52 I'll see what MS has to offer.
Other World Computing has 4 GB memory upgrade for $90. I'll probably do that before I install Windows 7.
http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/memor...o/Upgrade/DDR3
|
When I did the windows student promo for my desktop PC i opted out of the disc, and just did the digital download, didn't know if you knew you could do that 
(Saves 13$  )
|
|
|
10-24-2009, 12:12 AM
|
#17
|
GOAT!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sclitheroe
Just installed 7 Pro in Fusion 2.0.6, and everything works well. No Aero support right now, but that is coming with version 3.0 on the 27th.
As for why I did it, I have some vbscript and powershell work I need to do, and its annoying working remotely via RDP or Citrix. I gave myself a 32 gig virtual C: partition, seems like plenty if MacOS is your primary gig and hold all your documents and whatnot. From what I've experienced so far, 1 gig is enough RAM for acceptable Win7 performance in a VM.
|
Yeah Windows 7 runs great in Fusion 2.06. I must've just got my hands on a bad beta version of 3. I like the feel of Fusion better than Parallels, so I'll definitely be trying 3.0 out on the 27th.
XP runs perfectly in Fusion. It just reminds me too much of office work that I get bummed out using it.
|
|
|
10-24-2009, 12:22 AM
|
#18
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SW calgary
|
Ive been using Parallels 5 tonight...and all I gotta say is wait for the RC of this beast before purchasing any new upgrades. It runs smoother then 3.0 RC and its just a beta! :O
Great stuff!
|
|
|
10-24-2009, 01:01 AM
|
#19
|
GOAT!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by silentsim
Ive been using Parallels 5 tonight...and all I gotta say is wait for the RC of this beast before purchasing any new upgrades. It runs smoother then 3.0 RC and its just a beta! :O
Great stuff!
|
Did you find that on a torrent site, or do you have beta access?
|
|
|
10-24-2009, 08:52 AM
|
#20
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SW calgary
|
its an open beta
http://www.warp2search.net/contentte..._released.html
click the download link at the bottom
once installed it will ask to actiate- put in your email it sends u a 1 month code
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to silentsim For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:05 AM.
|
|