Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-11-2009, 02:41 PM   #1
Captaincanada80
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Captaincanada80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default Chevy Volt - 100 KM's on 1L of Gas

http://ca.news.finance.yahoo.com/s/1...ne-100-km.html

http://gm-volt.com/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevrolet_Volt

$40 000 US
30 already made
Can produce 10/day
Expected launch of 2011

Isn't a terrible looking car either


__________________
Originally Posted by oilboy2
This deal is DONE, im not sure what the worry is. Heatly is an Oiler, just some paperwork to get done. This isnt another Nylander incident
Captaincanada80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 02:46 PM   #2
Dion
Not a casual user
 
Dion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
Exp:
Default

Nice car but it will be out of the price range of a lot of Canadians. I don't see this car being a huge hit with car buyers.

Maybe GM should build a car that most can afford.
__________________
Dion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 02:48 PM   #3
Tyler
Franchise Player
 
Tyler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Lots of concern over mileage. It appears they're measuring it in a new, sketchy way:

http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/c...-ship-in-2010/
Tyler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 02:50 PM   #4
ken0042
Playboy Mansion Poolboy
 
ken0042's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Close enough to make a beer run during a TV timeout
Exp:
Default

What is the maximum range of this car before you need to plug it in again?
ken0042 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 02:55 PM   #5
Regulator75
Franchise Player
 
Regulator75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Behind Nikkor Glass
Exp:
Default

At least GM finally built a decent looking vehicle.
__________________

More photos on Flickr
Regulator75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 02:55 PM   #6
SportsJunky
Uncle Chester
 
SportsJunky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevrolet_Volt
Quote:
For trips less than about 40 miles (64 km) per recharge cycle, the Volt will not use any on-board gasoline. Assigning a fuel consumption value which only refers to on-board fuel might not be appropriate.[61] Once the Volt's battery has discharged to its lower limit set-point, the Volt's range-extending gasoline engine is expected to get from approximately 50 mpg-US (4.7 L/100 km; 60 mpg-imp) to as much as 150 mpg-US (1.6 L/100 km; 180 mpg-imp) depending on its run-time duty cycles. Once the battery has been recharged to an upper limit set-point (by the gasoline engine driven, 53 kW on-board generator), the internal combustion engine will again shut off. The variables that contribute to the specific duty cycle of the internal combustion engine will need to be factored in to the Volt's final fuel economy rating as determined by the EPA.[62] On August 11, 2009, GM released their estimated EPA urban cycle (aka city) fuel economy rating for the Volt of 230 mpg-US (1.0 L/100 km; 280 mpg-imp).[63][64]
SportsJunky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 02:59 PM   #7
You Need a Thneed
Voted for Kodos
 
You Need a Thneed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

In the OP, the pics are of the original concept vehicle, not the production vehicle.

Regarding mileage, they pretty much had to invent a new way to measure mileage, because the way they were doing it basically would have been meaningless to electric cars. Mileage is something that could vary greatly in a car like this. I don't know if there is an easy way to compare vehicles that have this kind of powertrain, and especially not in terms of comparing the amount of gasoline they use.
You Need a Thneed is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to You Need a Thneed For This Useful Post:
Old 08-11-2009, 03:04 PM   #8
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Yeah, here's the production car:



__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to photon For This Useful Post:
Old 08-11-2009, 03:04 PM   #9
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dion View Post
Nice car but it will be out of the price range of a lot of Canadians. I don't see this car being a huge hit with car buyers.

Maybe GM should build a car that most can afford.
I agree, I think its about 10-15k too much to be a big hit....at this price its more or less bordering on being a luxury vehicle for most people. The Prius, while not cheap, is at least within the range of most car buyers.

It seems like GM is banking on this car to change their future (how long have they been working on this now, and its still years away)....but I have my doubts. I hope there are several other Volt Jrs in the works.
Table 5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 03:11 PM   #10
burn_this_city
Franchise Player
 
burn_this_city's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Once production picks up the cost will go down. Its cost a lot in R & D and it takes time to reduce the costs and pass the savings along to the consumer.
burn_this_city is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 03:18 PM   #11
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burn_this_city View Post
Once production picks up the cost will go down. Its cost a lot in R & D and it takes time to reduce the costs and pass the savings along to the consumer.
Im sure they are doing this to an extend already, but maybe they need to subsidize a good chunk of the initial cost then in order to make it popular (like Apple/At&t did with the iphone, or Sony with the Playstation). Production won't pick up if nobody is buying the car. I just don't see that many people buying a compact car for 40 grand right off the bat.
Table 5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 03:20 PM   #12
MarchHare
Franchise Player
 
MarchHare's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: YSJ (1979-2002) -> YYC (2002-2022) -> YVR (2022-present)
Exp:
Default

How many kWh of electricity does it take to fully charge the battery? Will the amount you save on gasoline purchases offset your increased power bill?

From an environmental angle, if you're living in an area where your electricity is generated by burning fossil fuels such as coal, will driving this vehicle increase or decrease your carbon footprint?
MarchHare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 03:20 PM   #13
burn_this_city
Franchise Player
 
burn_this_city's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Considering they're bankrupt I dont think they can give heavy discounts. Plus if people factor fuel costs into the purchase price they might see the economics in owning a more expensive car.
burn_this_city is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 03:22 PM   #14
alltherage
Missed the bus
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

I think it's a nice looking car too. Could be the savior of GM honestly. I think lots of rich people will buy it for the same reason they buy smart cars, macs, priuses, etc. It's a cache thing... "I'm environmentally concious."
alltherage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 03:23 PM   #15
Mark
Backup Goalie
 
Mark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyler View Post
Lots of concern over mileage. It appears they're measuring it in a new, sketchy way:

http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/c...-ship-in-2010/
The comment that the shipping date is now moved to an undisclosed month and year could mean it may never come out. Were they just dangling it to get bailout money? Shame on them for making oil companies sweat.
Mark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 03:24 PM   #16
Jayems
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

This explains it fairly accurately:

Quote:
So let's say the car is driven 50 miles in a day. For the first 40 miles, no gas is used and during the last 10 miles, 0.2 gallons are used. That's the equivalent of 250 miles per gallon. But, if the driver continues on to 80 miles, total fuel economy would drop to about 100 mpg. And if the driver goes 300 miles, the fuel economy would be just 62.5 mpg.

http://money.cnn.com/2009/08/11/auto...ion=2009081108
Jayems is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 03:24 PM   #17
GreatWhiteEbola
First Line Centre
 
GreatWhiteEbola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarchHare View Post
How many kWh of electricity does it take to fully charge the battery? Will the amount you save on gasoline purchases offset your increased power bill?

From an environmental angle, if you're living in an area where your electricity is generated by burning fossil fuels such as coal, will driving this vehicle increase or decrease your carbon footprint?

The Volt will need to be plugged in at night to recharge. The company said it estimates it will need 10 kilowatt hours for the recharge necessary to travel 40 miles. That should cost a total of about 40 cents at off-peak electricity rates in Detroit, Henderson said.

http://money.cnn.com/2009/08/11/auto...ion=2009081108
__________________

GreatWhiteEbola is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 03:26 PM   #18
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

http://scienceblogs.com/goodmath/200...230_mpg_on.php
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to photon For This Useful Post:
Old 08-11-2009, 03:31 PM   #19
Swarly
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Swarly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burn_this_city View Post
Considering they're bankrupt I dont think they can give heavy discounts. Plus if people factor fuel costs into the purchase price they might see the economics in owning a more expensive car.
they were never bankrupt, they entered bankruptcy protection, which they left after only 30 days.
Swarly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 03:37 PM   #20
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swarly View Post
they were never bankrupt, they entered bankruptcy protection, which they left after only 30 days.
They also now have a good chunk of their company owned by the Government of course. As a US tax payer, I would actually rather invest money into something that will be good for the long-term (such as electric cars), as opposed to ensuring some high-school educated union worker keeps getting 160k a year.
Table 5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:49 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy