Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Other Sports: Football, Baseball, Local Hockey, Etc...
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-20-2009, 03:50 PM   #1
socktape
Crash and Bang Winger
 
socktape's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: I went west as a young man
Exp:
Default Dome or not to Dome...

Surprised no one has brought this up (the mods can move this to the other sports thread if they see fit)

The powers that be are going to spend $1 million on the fesability of a domed stadium for the Roughriders in Regina. What do you think? They are looking to replace Mozaik Field which was originally built in 1910 with a 38,000 seat (expandible to 50,000) 350 million dollar stadium.

http://www.tsn.ca/cfl/story/?id=285159
socktape is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2009, 03:50 PM   #2
Jordan!
Jordan!
 
Jordan!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chandler, AZ
Exp:
Default

350 mill for a CFL stadium?
Jordan! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2009, 03:50 PM   #3
Swayze11
something else haha
 
Swayze11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by socktape View Post
Surprised no one has brought this up (the mods can move this to the other sports thread if they see fit)

The powers that be are going to spend $1 million on the fesability of a domed stadium for the Roughriders in Regina. What do you think? They are looking to replace Mozaik Field which was originally built in 1910 with a 38,000 seat (expandible to 50,000) 350 million dollar stadium.

http://www.tsn.ca/cfl/story/?id=285159
That is exactly why nobody has brought it up.
__________________

Swayze11 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Swayze11 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-20-2009, 03:52 PM   #4
J pold
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2004
Exp:
Default

Really misleading thread title.
J pold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2009, 03:52 PM   #5
Scoopdogg
Scoring Winger
 
Scoopdogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ctown
Exp:
Default

I thought this thread was going to be about something else....
Scoopdogg is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Scoopdogg For This Useful Post:
Old 07-20-2009, 03:55 PM   #6
albertGQ
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

I didn't Dome 16 months ago and now I have a little rugrat running around the house
albertGQ is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to albertGQ For This Useful Post:
Old 07-20-2009, 03:59 PM   #7
calgaryrocks
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Exp:
Default

lol maybe this should be in the other sports forum. I have heard about the possibility of a dome in regina before, but thought it was a joke. would be interesting to see it happen, but thats alot of money, in a country where money doesn't easily go to sports stadiums (unless your in Toronto...)
__________________
GO FLAMES, STAMPEDERS, ROUGHNECKS, CALVARY, DAWGS and SURGE!
calgaryrocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2009, 04:13 PM   #8
valo403
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

I think it's an idiotic idea, absolutely unnecessary. I think it's a product of an area of the country trying WAY too hard to show everybody else that they are no longer the poor step-children.
valo403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2009, 04:17 PM   #9
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Architectural Concept...

__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 07-20-2009, 04:25 PM   #10
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

$350 million for a football stadium in Saskatchewan is a complete and utter waste.

If they want to spend that much money on sporting venues, awesome! But honestly, they could easily build a new football stadium for half that, and spend the rest upgrading the WHL arenas in the province, and still have money left over for community rinks.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2009, 04:40 PM   #11
octothorp
Franchise Player
 
octothorp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: not lurking
Exp:
Default

That would be brutal. The indoor CFL stadiums are relatively weak on atmosphere (although BC Place seems to have its moments). And really, how much of the CFL season is really affected by weather? Maybe a month or so, part of which Sask isn't going to be in every year. Even forgetting about the money, I think it's a bad idea. Who wants to go hang out in a covered stadium on a warm july or august afternoon or a crisp september/early-october evening? That said, if it's anything like McMahon, even $100 million could supply some kick-ass upgrades.
octothorp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2009, 04:46 PM   #12
krazycanuck
Won the Worst Son Ever Award
 
krazycanuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sherwood Park
Exp:
Default

what else do you use the stadium for? It's hard to justify 350 million for 10 games a year and another playoff game every 15 years.
krazycanuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2009, 04:51 PM   #13
Tyler
Franchise Player
 
Tyler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

When is McMahon going to be replaced?

It's more than 40 years old is it not?
Tyler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2009, 05:06 PM   #14
calculoso
Franchise Player
 
calculoso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by krazycanuck View Post
what else do you use the stadium for? It's hard to justify 350 million for 10 games a year and another playoff game every 15 years.
Not sure if that's just a shot at the Green Gang, but McMahon stadium gets used a lot more than just for Stamps games. I'm sure Sask's stadium is much the same.
calculoso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2009, 05:10 PM   #15
Cowboy89
Franchise Player
 
Cowboy89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calculoso View Post
Not sure if that's just a shot at the Green Gang, but McMahon stadium gets used a lot more than just for Stamps games. I'm sure Sask's stadium is much the same.
Even so that's $350 per sask resident or $440 per tax paying/future tax paying resident. Considering that half of the funds they were looking to get out the 'Western Economic Diversification Fund' Federally, even we could be on the hook for this pipe dream.
Cowboy89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2009, 05:16 PM   #16
calculoso
Franchise Player
 
calculoso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowboy89 View Post
Even so that's $350 per sask resident or $440 per tax paying/future tax paying resident. Considering that half of the funds they were looking to get out the 'Western Economic Diversification Fund' Federally, even we could be on the hook for this pipe dream.
Not debating whether it is a good idea or not, just differentiating between the 10 day/night statement and the 100-200 day/night reality.
calculoso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2009, 05:27 PM   #17
browna
Franchise Player
 
browna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calculoso View Post
Not sure if that's just a shot at the Green Gang, but McMahon stadium gets used a lot more than just for Stamps games. I'm sure Sask's stadium is much the same.
It does, Dino Football, HS Football, Mens and Womens soccer, field hockey, but how many events other than those does it get used that require more than say 3-5000 seats? The same (I'd say less usage) would go in Regina currently; its the field that's of use, not the stadium.

You could build a couple 5000 seat stadiums for 1/10 of that price and get as much usage as McMahon or Taylor Field does now.

That said, I assume the Sask government has unrealistic visions of the Rolling Stones again rolling though town annually and other big concert acts that would bypass Calgary and Edmonton to come play in Regina and the resultant tourism $ from Albertans and Manitobans would, in theory, pay for the stadium in 10-15 years.

However, that's walking a fine line. I am guessing the acts that could require more than 20K seats (AC/DC, Stones) are still going to play Edmonton and BC Place, some still even in smaller places like the Saddledome (with higher ticket $) and would be tough to draw the 30K from outside the province 5 or 6 times a year (and how many are going to trek to Regina in December, certainly very few people driving) that would be needed to fill the stadium at premuim priced seats, and, bring in the tourism $.

4H and farm impliment shows are more likely to be the order of the day in a covered stadium...but again, you don't need to construct 50000 seats around the field to hold those, or piss away $350m to accomodate those.
browna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2009, 05:54 PM   #18
GreatWhiteEbola
First Line Centre
 
GreatWhiteEbola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowboy89 View Post
Even so that's $350 per sask resident or $440 per tax paying/future tax paying resident. Considering that half of the funds they were looking to get out the 'Western Economic Diversification Fund' Federally, even we could be on the hook for this pipe dream.

Is there not a large native population in Saskatchewan?
__________________


Last edited by GreatWhiteEbola; 07-20-2009 at 05:56 PM.
GreatWhiteEbola is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2009, 06:31 PM   #19
FurnaceFace
Franchise Player
 
FurnaceFace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: 110
Exp:
Default

According to my friend who lives there, this is primarily due to the ego of the mayor wanting to put his stamp on the city. Mayor Fiacco (aka Fiasco) makes Bronco Dave look like a responsible guy. If you want to see what a city run by "Blinky" McIver would be like, see Regina.

Why don't they just build a couple of bridges over Wascana and call it a day?
__________________
FurnaceFace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2009, 07:10 PM   #20
valo403
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by browna View Post
It does, Dino Football, HS Football, Mens and Womens soccer, field hockey, but how many events other than those does it get used that require more than say 3-5000 seats? The same (I'd say less usage) would go in Regina currently; its the field that's of use, not the stadium.

You could build a couple 5000 seat stadiums for 1/10 of that price and get as much usage as McMahon or Taylor Field does now.

That said, I assume the Sask government has unrealistic visions of the Rolling Stones again rolling though town annually and other big concert acts that would bypass Calgary and Edmonton to come play in Regina and the resultant tourism $ from Albertans and Manitobans would, in theory, pay for the stadium in 10-15 years.

However, that's walking a fine line. I am guessing the acts that could require more than 20K seats (AC/DC, Stones) are still going to play Edmonton and BC Place, some still even in smaller places like the Saddledome (with higher ticket $) and would be tough to draw the 30K from outside the province 5 or 6 times a year (and how many are going to trek to Regina in December, certainly very few people driving) that would be needed to fill the stadium at premuim priced seats, and, bring in the tourism $.

4H and farm impliment shows are more likely to be the order of the day in a covered stadium...but again, you don't need to construct 50000 seats around the field to hold those, or piss away $350m to accomodate those.
Yep, I've heard all these arguments from delusional supporters of the idea. Like you said, a domed stadium is completely unnecessary for pretty much every use besides late season playoff games, and with the Riders history I'm not sure it's a great idea to count on hosting a ton of playoff games.

The concert argument always makes me laugh. There are virtually no acts that conduct stadium tours outside of summer, so the dome gets them no advantage over an open air stadium.

It would rather hilarious to watch them build it though.
valo403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:30 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy