Quote:
Originally Posted by mikey_the_redneck
There is a second Zeitgeist movie called Zeitgeist:Addendum, and it is very interesting.
It talks about how fractional reserve banking works, and how the U.S. Federal Reserve (which is privately owned BTW), along with big corporations manipulate their own people and other countries for their profit.
Also, there is an awesome documentary called "Money Masters" made in the late 90's that breaks down the fraudulent central banking system that is prevalent today.
I was never taught in school that from day one, the founding fathers of the U.S. were fighting England for not only political independance, but more importantly to be free of the debt system generated by the Bank of England. They wanted the government to issue their own "debt free" currency to use..................and it resulted in wars and several assassinations/attempted assassinations including those of Abraham Lincoln, JFK and others.
I would highly recommend Money Masters, you can watch it for free on youtube.
|
I am not a lawyer, I study the law privately and this post can not be construed as advice. Just posted for discussion.
Mikey, the funny thing is they (law Society) can have their money (The Law Society is the "power" that sold us out when Canada went Bankrupt. They still have their laws and statues that they need to follow. Once you send notice to them that you are not a child nor a dependent of the "system" as you are right now, this is called a Denial of Governance. Claim your rights as under Common Law (Read the Criminal Code of Canada about this), send it to your defacto agents, wait for rebuttal, but if done right you wont get one. Then you are not part of that system. The reason why it is defacto is becuse the country is in recievership. All the courts are Defacto not De jure (lawful and honest IMO). The Judge is a Banker before eing a judge (this actually goes against his Oath). Judges are bound to the UCC, and Canada Security act the PPSA.
PPSA
Conflicts with Legislation in General
73 Subject to section 74, if there is a conflict between this act and any other Act, this act prevails unless the other act contains an express provision that it, or a provision of it, applies despite the Personal Property Security Act.
This tells you plainly that this act has more power then just about anything.
Remember the post about the "PERSON" you are not a person but you have a person. Your Person is the security intrest. Your Person has A LOT of money in a bond. The taxes you pay go to this Bond. This Bond pays for everything in Canada as long as the Government believes it is good for you and good for society. Shady business.
Section Scope of Act: Security Intrests
2(1) Subject to section 4, this Act applies
(a) to every transaction that in substance creates a security interest, without reguard to its form and without reguard to the person who has title to the collateral, and
(b) without limiting paragraph (a), to a chattel mortgage, a conditional sale, a floating charge, a pledge, a trust indenture, a trust recipt, an assignment, a consignment, a lease, a trust, and a transfer of chattel paper if they secure payment or performance of an obligation.
What is a Security Interest? ( you may need definitions for this)
(a) an intrest in goods, chattel paper, a security, a document of title, an insturment, money or an intangible that secures payment of performance of an obligation, but does not include the interest of a seller who has shipped goods to a buyer under a negotiable bill of lading or its equivalent to the order of the seller or to the order of an agent of the seller, unless the parties have otherwise evidenced an intention to create or provide for a security interest in the goods, and
(b) the interest of
(i) a transferee arising from the transfer of an account or a transfer of chattle paper,
(ii) a person who delivers goods to another person under a commercial consignment, and
(iii) a lessor under a lease for a term of more than one year, whether or not the interest secures payment of performance of an obligation;
what does "intangible" mean? (remember Law Society change the definitions of english words to decieve/trick/complicate)
intangible means
(a) personal property, but does not include goods, chattle paper, a document of title, an insturment, money or a security, and
(b) a licence;
"insturment" means
(a) a bill of exchange, note or cheque within the meaning of Bills of Exchange Act (Canada),
(b) any other writing that evidences a right to paymet of money and is of a type that in the ordinary course of business is transferred by delivery with any necessary endorsement or assignment, or
(c) a letter of credit or an advice ofcredit if the letter of credit or advice of credit states on it that it must be surrendered on claiming payment under it,
but does not include
(d) chattel paper, a document of title or security, or
(e) a bond, debenture or similar document evidenced an obigation secured, in whole or in part, by a mortgage of an interest in land unless the interest being mortgaged is itself, a mortgage of land;
You will also find this:
"value" means any consideration sufficient to support a simple contract, and includes an antecedent debt or liability.
Antecedent debt is IMPORTANT - Now the definition of 'intangible'? What is your greatest intangeble asset? Think about it! Important and intangeble.
Your identity or your name? You bet! Your name is an intangible security and you have the utmost interest in it under Natural, Commercial and Common Law. Why is this so important?
Many PPSA's in Canada state something like this (Ontarios);
Except in so far as they are inconsistant with express provisions of this ACT, the principles of law and equity, including the law merchant, the law relating to capacity to contract, principle and agent, estoppel, fraud, misrepresentation, duress, coercion, mistake and other validating rules of law, shall supplement this act and shall continue to apply.
Now add this up and you have.
1. Your name is an intangible security interest.
2. The PPSA covers all transactions concerning security intrests.
3. When someone ask for your name, that is a transaction under the PPSA (stating your name in court, You just contracted with the judge)
4. That transaction is invalidated by any raud, misrepresentation, duress, coercion, mistake and other validating or invalidating rules of law.
5. You can become the secured creditor against your "person" so any debt they try to collect from that "person" they have to make sure you get paid first.
6. If you create an antecedent debt with the government and when they try to point out that you owe them money, you can point out they owed you first and to apply that debit they are claiming to your credit.
7. Any Insterment creating a duty to act or pay is a security interest. Claims meet this definition.
We may have been sold out by the Law Society and the Governing bodies but we have remedy. This is just a piece of it.
Law is only offers and Contracts. No matter how scary an offer can seem from a lawyer it is still an offer and you can refuse to contract. They may try to trick you but you can always take remedy. Instead of freaking out about what the "powers that be" have done. Use their law they have no choice but to use (they swore an oath), against them.
Antecedent debt removed
Bills of Exchange is fun too.
I never get a bill at a gas station. Or any other place. Strange isnt it! Without a true bill I have no obligation to pay! Not an invoice or a receipt. I can ask for a true bill. If that can not be produced I tell them that I have no obligation to pay!
This one needs more study but my remedy is there.
Tower
