Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Do you agree with the visa requirements for Mexicans?
Yes, the gov’t should impose VISA requirements on Mexico; to stop fraudulent refugees. 40 75.47%
No, the gov’t should not impose VISA requirements on Mexico, there’s no real problem with refugees. 13 24.53%
Voters: 53. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-13-2009, 03:24 PM   #1
hockeycop
Crash and Bang Winger
 
hockeycop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Exp:
Thumbs up Visa Restriction Introduced for Czech Rep and Mexico

The Czech one everyone knew was coming, but it is a bit of a surprise to some to see Mexico get slapped with a visa. I presonally think Canada has made an excellent decision! Thanks Mr. Kenny!

Quote:
Canada imposes a visa on Mexico
Quote:

Ottawa, July 13, 2009 — Beginning 12:01 a.m. EDT on July 14, 2009, Mexican nationals will require a visa to travel to Canada, Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism Minister Jason Kenney announced today. For the first 48 hours, Mexican citizens may apply for entry on arrival in Canada. After 11:59 p.m. EDT July 15, 2009, a visa will be required.
Refugee claims from Mexico have almost tripled since 2005, making it the number one source country for claims. In 2008, more than 9,400 claims filed in Canada came from Mexican nationals, representing 25 per cent of all claims received. Of the Mexican claims reviewed and finalized in 2008 by the Immigration and Refugee Board, an independent administrative tribunal, only 11 per cent were accepted.
“In addition to creating significant delays and spiraling new costs in our refugee program, the sheer volume of these claims is undermining our ability to help people fleeing real persecution,” said Minister Kenney. “All too often, people who really need Canada’s protection find themselves in a long line, waiting for months and sometimes years to have their claims heard. This is unacceptable.
“The visa requirement I am announcing will give us a greater ability to manage the flow of people into Canada and verify bona fides. By taking this important step towards reducing the burden on our refugee system, we will be better equipped to process genuine refugee claims faster.”
“The visa process will allow us to assess who is coming to Canada as a legitimate visitor and who might be trying to use the refugee system to jump the immigration queue,” Minister Kenney said. “It is not fair for those who have been waiting patiently to come to Canada, sometimes for years, when others succeed in bypassing our immigration system.”
Canada regularly reviews its visa policies toward other countries. Countries are aware that if they do not satisfy the conditions of a visa-exemption, a visa may be imposed.
This change means that nationals from Mexico who want to travel to Canada will first need to apply for a Temporary Resident Visa and meet the requirements to receive one. It is up to the applicant to satisfy the visa officer their visit to Canada is temporary, they will not overstay their approved time in Canada, they have enough money to cover their stay in Canada, they are in good health, they do not have a criminal record, and are not a security risk to Canadians. These requirements are the same for anyone who wants to visit Canada.
Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) has been working to increase processing capacity in Mexico City. Nevertheless, the imposition of the visa will mean short-term delays in travel as CIC puts resources in place. Applicants are encouraged to send their applications by courier or registered mail and to avoid visiting the Embassy unless specifically invited for an interview.
“Canada has strong ties with Mexico,” said Minister Kenney. “We continue to welcome all genuine travellers to Canada from this country.”
http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/departm...2009-07-13.asp

Last edited by hockeycop; 07-13-2009 at 03:27 PM.
hockeycop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2009, 03:25 PM   #2
peter12
Franchise Player
 
peter12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Exp:
Default

Why is this really a good thing?
peter12 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to peter12 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-13-2009, 03:27 PM   #3
Rerun
Often Thinks About Pickles
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Okotoks
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeycop View Post
The Czech one everyone knew was coming, but it is a bit of a surprise to some to see Mexico get slapped with a visa. I presonally think Canada has made an excellent decision! Thanks Mr. Kenny!

cic.gc.ca

Hasn't hit the news yet, so I can't post a link to any news article.
Never heard about either. So what you are saying is that a Mexican has to get a visa now to travel to Canada?... and the same with Czechs?

I can understand Mexico but why Czech?


Edit: posted before the link came up.
Rerun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2009, 03:28 PM   #4
Suave
Scoring Winger
 
Suave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

See this thread for the Czech issue:
http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showthr...ighlight=czech
Suave is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Suave For This Useful Post:
Old 07-13-2009, 03:36 PM   #5
hockeycop
Crash and Bang Winger
 
hockeycop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peter12 View Post
Why is this really a good thing?
I refer you to this:

Quote:
“The visa process will allow us to assess who is coming to Canada as a legitimate visitor and who might be trying to use the refugee system to jump the immigration queue,” Minister Kenney said. “It is not fair for those who have been waiting patiently to come to Canada, sometimes for years, when others succeed in bypassing our immigration system.”
Canada is being abused right now by economic migrants. The refugee system is being exploited, and this is the only way to combat it. As of right now, anyone from Mexico can get on a plane, fly in and claim refugee. There is a massive backlog of claims, most of them proven to be false.

It is unfortunate that GENUINE travellers are going to be inconvenienced by this, but it is a necessary evil.

Last edited by hockeycop; 07-13-2009 at 03:39 PM.
hockeycop is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to hockeycop For This Useful Post:
Old 07-13-2009, 03:39 PM   #6
Iowa_Flames_Fan
Referee
 
Iowa_Flames_Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Over the hill
Exp:
Default

Given that we don't share a huge border with Mexico, I'm pretty doubtful that this will make any difference whatsoever. However, if it gets Jason Kenney's face into the news, then.... all the power to him I guess. Sometimes you have to do what you can to mask your own mediocrity.
Iowa_Flames_Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2009, 03:43 PM   #7
peter12
Franchise Player
 
peter12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iowa_Flames_Fan View Post
Given that we don't share a huge border with Mexico, I'm pretty doubtful that this will make any difference whatsoever. However, if it gets Jason Kenney's face into the news, then.... all the power to him I guess. Sometimes you have to do what you can to mask your own mediocrity.
We get quite a few migrant Mexican workers up here. From my experience, they are often illegals and are abused as such.
peter12 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to peter12 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-13-2009, 03:48 PM   #8
hockeycop
Crash and Bang Winger
 
hockeycop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iowa_Flames_Fan View Post
Given that we don't share a huge border with Mexico, I'm pretty doubtful that this will make any difference whatsoever. However, if it gets Jason Kenney's face into the news, then.... all the power to him I guess. Sometimes you have to do what you can to mask your own mediocrity.
Wrong. Air travel, and those fleeing from Immigration in the USA, are getting here and making claims. This will have a MASSIVE impact on port of entry operations (mostly air mode).

Here is some news with some good facts...

http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=1786835
hockeycop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2009, 04:15 PM   #9
Iowa_Flames_Fan
Referee
 
Iowa_Flames_Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Over the hill
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeycop View Post
Wrong. Air travel, and those fleeing from Immigration in the USA, are getting here and making claims. This will have a MASSIVE impact on port of entry operations (mostly air mode).

Here is some news with some good facts...

http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=1786835
Well, I hope you'll forgive me for not finding those facts, or their source (in an 800 word piece that likely reproduces nearly verbatim the minister's own press release OR the numbers. By Kenney's own admission there are fewer than 6000 people who will be affected by imposing visa restrictions on Mexico. Given that in the last 5 years 1.1 million new immigrants came into Canada legally--we're not talking about a huge number here. That's about 5500 people. By contrast, it's estimated that 13 or 14 million undocumented immigrants are working in the U.S. We don't have to copy everything the U.S. does, you know. It's okay for us to recognize that we face different challenges and need to develop our own unique solutions to them. But then, Jason Kenney isn't scaring anyone with his intellect, so I can't say I'm shocked.

Honestly, it's not even that I see a reason NOT to do this--I just don't see much of a reason FOR doing this sort of thing other than advancing a sort of logic of nativism that seems to be the government's central strategy for winning the next election. If this is their best idea, they've got troubles.
Iowa_Flames_Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2009, 04:20 PM   #10
Flame Of Liberty
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sydney, NSfW
Exp:
Default

Gotta love the thumbs up in the thread title... Canada is scooping up people from all over the world, most of them from totaly different cultures all in the name of multiculturalism and PC so no one dares to say a thing in the fear of being called a racist, but when Canada slaps a fellow NATO member with visa, it's an excellent decision...

BTW Before you jump on me that I am biased - I am neither Czech nor Mexican so it doesn't affect me.
Flame Of Liberty is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Flame Of Liberty For This Useful Post:
Old 07-13-2009, 04:25 PM   #11
LouCypher
Powerplay Quarterback
 
LouCypher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada!
Exp:
Default

Anything to better control the flow of people into this country should only benefit in the long run. So many places are overpopulated that its become far to problematic to even implement visa requirements. Canada has yet to reach this stage and we are very wise to have more restrictions in place. Might seem like a rather small number of people that it shouldn't matter but in 20 years it may be to late to think ahead.

People may want more freedom but to much freedom leaves not enough to go around for everyone in the long run.
LouCypher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2009, 04:28 PM   #12
alltherage
Missed the bus
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Sorry this is probably a naive question, but... does that mean anything different for going to Mexico on vacation?
alltherage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2009, 04:37 PM   #13
Zarathustra
Scoring Winger
 
Zarathustra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alltherage View Post
Sorry this is probably a naive question, but... does that mean anything different for going to Mexico on vacation?
Good question, I also wonder about this.

Lchoy mentioned in the other thread that Canada had the same visa policy for Brazil, and in return the government of Brazil put sanctions on travelers from Canada in the form of required tourist visas to visit Brazil (which cost around $200 altogether).

Might we see some reciprocation from the Mexican government? A $50 or $100 tourist visa per person for Canadians would generate significant revenue. But would a Mexican fee encourage Canadians to take their tourist dollars to elsewhere in the Caribbean?

Last edited by Zarathustra; 07-13-2009 at 04:39 PM.
Zarathustra is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Zarathustra For This Useful Post:
Old 07-13-2009, 04:44 PM   #14
RW99
First Line Centre
 
RW99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 103 104END 106 109 111 117 122 202 203 207 208 216 217 219 221 222 224 225 313 317 HC G
Exp:
Default

While this is good news for immigration, it's bad news for the tourism industry. With a lot of vacation packages booked based on these direct flights, the tourism industry will be taking another hit this year.
RW99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to RW99 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-13-2009, 04:45 PM   #15
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flame Of Liberty View Post
Gotta love the thumbs up in the thread title... Canada is scooping up people from all over the world, most of them from totaly different cultures all in the name of multiculturalism and PC so no one dares to say a thing in the fear of being called a racist, but when Canada slaps a fellow NATO member with visa, it's an excellent decision...

BTW Before you jump on me that I am biased - I am neither Czech nor Mexican so it doesn't affect me.
Except that this decision does not hamper the legitimate immigration system. People going about it the right way can still petition the government for permanent residency in Canada. However, when a system designed to allow people with genuine need is finding itself strained by a large number of fraudulent claims, overwhelmingly from one country, it makes sense to make it harder for such fraud to happen. That is the entire point of this change.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Resolute 14 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-13-2009, 04:51 PM   #16
jtfrogger
Powerplay Quarterback
 
jtfrogger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zarathustra View Post
Good question, I also wonder about this.

Lchoy mentioned in the other thread that Canada had the same visa policy for Brazil, and in return the government of Brazil put sanctions on travelers from Canada in the form of required tourist visas to visit Brazil (which cost around $200 altogether).

Might we see some reciprocation from the Mexican government? A $50 or $100 tourist visa per person for Canadians would generate significant revenue. But would a Mexican fee encourage Canadians to take their tourist dollars to elsewhere in the Caribbean?
The Mexican government would be silly to do this. Tourism is a significant industry. Canadians have many other choices. Given the rise in corruption over the last few years and the Swine flu, I suspect that they have been losing substantial tourist dollars. Tacking on a $50 or $100 fee will just continue to deter Canadians even more.
jtfrogger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2009, 04:53 PM   #17
jtfrogger
Powerplay Quarterback
 
jtfrogger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RW99 View Post
While this is good news for immigration, it's bad news for the tourism industry. With a lot of vacation packages booked based on these direct flights, the tourism industry will be taking another hit this year.
Do you really think there are enough Mexican or Czech tourists coming to Canada that this would make much of a difference?
jtfrogger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2009, 05:06 PM   #18
hockeycop
Crash and Bang Winger
 
hockeycop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Exp:
Default

This will not at all affect people going through legitimate avenues to get Permanent Resident status. A visa is required for PR landings anyway.

It will hardly inconvenience legitimate tourists. All they have to do is apply and show some supporting evidence that they are legitimate tourists.

This will not (negatively) effect REAL refugees. They will continue to be selected from the poorest, war-torn, impoverished areas around the world. The Canadian govt will continue to assist them in getting out of refugee camps and into Canada with instant PR status. This will address some of the backlog and make these REAL refugees get processed faster.

This will hamper efforts of FAKE refugees, low-skill economic migrants, and those with criminal histories. Airlines will no longer board those without visas, so they will not be able to come here without approval.

Keep in mind, when someone comes to Canada and claims refugee (when they are not really refs), they waste Officer's time, a Ministers Delegate's time, Immigration Boards time, Appeals Courts time, Inland Enforcement's time, and then Removal Officer's time. Guess who pays for all of this.

Some of the reasons I have heard of (from friends and acquaintances who work for Immigration) for claiming refugee:

- Drug dealer being harassed by the police
- Domestic dispute
- Got robbed
- Want welfare
- Want to know Canada

The list goes on and on...

Last edited by hockeycop; 07-13-2009 at 05:19 PM. Reason: Not a good speller...
hockeycop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2009, 05:10 PM   #19
hockeycop
Crash and Bang Winger
 
hockeycop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Exp:
Default

Also, Mexico is very unlikely to impose any restrictions on Canada as a retaliation. Mexico thrives on tourist dollars from Canada and the USA.

Most flights to/from Mexico are full of Canadians on hollidays. This will have a minimal impact on tourism either way.

Last edited by hockeycop; 07-13-2009 at 05:23 PM. Reason: Still a bad speller
hockeycop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2009, 05:20 PM   #20
Flame Of Liberty
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sydney, NSfW
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeycop View Post
It will hardly inconvenience legitimate tourism.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeycop View Post
Also, Mexico is very unlikely to impose any restrictions on Canada as a retaliation. Mexico thrives on tourist dollars from Canada and the USA.

How does that work? Visa is no threat to Canadian tourism industry, just a mere inconvenience for tourists but Mexico wont retaliate because visa for Canadians will hurt tourism in Mexico?
Flame Of Liberty is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Flame Of Liberty For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
economic migrants , edmonton still sucks , fake refugees , illegal workers , mexico-czech


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:14 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy