NSFW- Whoring in Edmonton. Teen Hoes trade sex for money.

[Poison]

Originally Posted by ok, ok,....I get it

nice try...but you will not be allowed to highjack this thread

Thats right! Fight the power!!!
Stand up for our thread fellow pervs!!!!

[Bring_Back_Shantz]

Originally Posted by Itse

Are you guys like 12, for f***s sake?

If we were wouldn't that make posting picutres of underaged girls okay?

[VladtheImpaler]

Originally Posted by FireFly

So what you're saying is that things which are human nature are implicitly okay? Killing people is human nature. Maybe we should legalize that.

Yeah I get it. You see a young chick and you think she's hot. Of course you do. When your teenage daughter brings home her 16 year old friends, they might be hot too. Heck, you might even think you have a hot 16 year old daughter. (Gross.) I myself even have a thing for barely legal boys apparently. The difference is, I would not hit that cause I KNOW it's wrong. I wouldn't even joke about it. The very first thought in my head after, 'damn!' is, 'how old do you think he is?'... certainly not, 'I'd hit that.' Only when I KNOW it's appropriate will I think about hittin that.

You have some good ideas, particularly in paragraph 1.

[flip]

Originally Posted by FireFly

I know you're only half being a smartass, and you're probably young, so yeah, it's likely okay. However I'd make a large wager that half the men who posted those pics are over 30, maybe even 40. Is it still okay when they could have daughters that age?

Furthermore, kids will be kids and young girls are stupid. Much like a 14 year old boy will fap to his heart's content when he figures out how his thing works, girls will show off everything they can when they figure out it makes boys like them. They DON'T think about how it makes old pervs like them, old pervs are not in their monkey sphere. The cute boy in grade 10 is though, and maybe he'll notice her if half her boobs are hanging out.

Well I'm 24 so 18 is borderline but anything less is a no-no for me. As long as people are just looking it is ok, in this instance. If people in this thread who are 25+ are actually stalking high schools looking for their next date then that is definitely a problem.

[Iowa_Flames_Fan]

Originally Posted by FireFly

I know you're only half being a smartass, and you're probably young, so yeah, it's likely okay. However I'd make a large wager that half the men who posted those pics are over 30, maybe even 40. Is it still okay when they could have daughters that age?

Furthermore, kids will be kids and young girls are stupid. Much like a 14 year old boy will fap to his heart's content when he figures out how his thing works, girls will show off everything they can when they figure out it makes boys like them. They DON'T think about how it makes old pervs like them, old pervs are not in their monkey sphere. The cute boy in grade 10 is though, and maybe he'll notice her if half her boobs are hanging out.

Good post, but.... what does "monkey sphere" mean?

[mikey_the_redneck]

Originally Posted by FireFly

So what you're saying is that things which are human nature are implicitly okay? Killing people is human nature. Maybe we should legalize that.

Yeah I get it. You see a young chick and you think she's hot. Of course you do. When your teenage daughter brings home her 16 year old friends, they might be hot too. Heck, you might even think you have a hot 16 year old daughter. (Gross.) I myself even have a thing for barely legal boys apparently. The difference is, I would not hit that cause I KNOW it's wrong. I wouldn't even joke about it. The very first thought in my head after, 'damn!' is, 'how old do you think he is?'... certainly not, 'I'd hit that.' Only when I KNOW it's appropriate will I think about hittin that.

I can't quite tell if you are female or not, but if you are, then you have no idea what I am talking about here. Men and women are different. Period.

And I know that "logically" of course it is wrong to pursue underage girls, but to say that there is no physiological response in men seeing young attractive women is not right either.

I read a great quote once that stated "Attraction is not a choice".........

[ok, ok,....I get it]

Originally Posted by flip

Well I'm 24 so 18 is borderline but anything less is a no-no for me. As long as people are just looking it is ok, in this instance. If people in this thread who are 25+ are actually stalking high schools looking for their next date then that is definitely a problem.

[flip]

Originally Posted by mikey_the_redneck

I can't quite tell if you are female or not, but if you are, then you have no idea what I am talking about here. Men and women are different. Period.

And I know that "logically" of course it is wrong to pursue underage girls, but to say that there is no physiological response in men seeing young attractive women is not right either.

I read a great quote once that stated "Attraction is not a choice".........

First, yes she's a chick. Second, duck, I'm pretty sure she's going to throw something at you.

[Ford Prefect]

Originally Posted by Iowa_Flames_Fan

Maybe I'm weird--but to me a 16 year old is a child. She might have developed some of the features of a woman, but mentally, she (or he) is a child--and so to "hit" that would, even if it isn't strictly speaking pedophilia, be exploitation under the best case scenario. She can't give informed consent in my view, and can't have a good conversation over dinner first. I know that people will joke about this and poke fun, and I'm actually not offended because I know or suspect that
1. The story in the OP is very likely untrue
2. The "jailbait" pictures are likely of girls that are at least 18. Some people look very young well into their twenties.

However, it did get a little dumb after a while. For one thing, all the pictures make the same joke. For another, it creates a weird, creepy boy-locker-room vibe that isn't usually the atmosphere at Calgarypuck, and some people (like, I don't know... women?) might find that atmosphere hostile.

I'm a parent, so that may change my perspective too--but to me you don't have to be a parent to know and realize that an underage girl is somebody's child. Even "hypothetically" and "in the abstract."

Am I a "killjoy" too?

As the parent of a 17-year-old daughter, I agree completely with your assessment of the psychological development of someone that age (16). Even at 17 she's a lot more mature than she was at 16, but still a couple hard knocks short of being an adult. And at 14 or 15? That's is definitely pedophilia in my books and not something I find to be in good taste to joke about regardless of the context.

[Save Us Sutter]

Originally Posted by FireFly

So what you're saying is that things which are human nature are implicitly okay? Killing people is human nature. Maybe we should legalize that.

No, but we can joke about killing people, can't we?

Originally Posted by FireFly

Yeah I get it. You see a young chick and you think she's hot. Of course you do. When your teenage daughter brings home her 16 year old friends, they might be hot too. Heck, you might even think you have a hot 16 year old daughter. (Gross.)

I'm going to go out on a limb and say those of us posting in this thread don't have 16 year old daughters. I'm in my twenties. When I have a daughter, it might change my opinion, but it might not. Doesn't mean anyone is thinkin' bout incest. I have attractive cousins that I don't "fap" over.

BTW, what an awful word.

Originally Posted by FireFly

I myself even have a thing for barely legal boys apparently. The difference is, I would not hit that cause I KNOW it's wrong. I wouldn't even joke about it. The very first thought in my head after, 'damn!' is, 'how old do you think he is?'... certainly not, 'I'd hit that.' Only when I KNOW it's appropriate will I think about hittin that.

Your brain is much more powerful than mine. I would think "Damn, I would hit that" as all one thought. If the girl turned around and was clearly 12 I would feel gross, yeah, but if she doesn't turn around, it's just another short skirt on the street. How do you find out if it's appropriate? Do you ask?

"Excuse me, before I go home to fantasize about your tight little boy-bum could you tell me how old you are?"

Haha, I'm just messin' around. I do, however, find the control you have over your biological urges and thoughts to be fascinating. And I mean no disrespect in saying that.

[Dan02]

Originally Posted by DuffMan

Jennifer Tilly (born Jennifer E. Chan, September 16, 1958)

Sorry, Didn't mean to derail the thread

so

she is 18+, so fap away guiltfree gents.

atleast so says the Washington post

[ok, ok,....I get it]

tight little boy-bum


maybe be this belongs in the confessions thread....noone will judge

[flip]

Originally Posted by Save Us Sutter

Your brain is much more powerful than mine. I would think "Damn, I would hit that" as all one thought. If the girl turned around and was clearly 12 I would feel gross, yeah, but if she doesn't turn around, it's just another short skirt on the street.

ugh. The 12yo skank who dresses like she's 16+, you ogle, or point her out to your buddies and then she turns around and she's 12. Damn you little 12yo skanks learn how to dress properly. Hate it when that happens.

Personally I often see girls that are between 16-19 (basically the ages of girls I can find hot without feeling like a pedophile) but that doesn't mean I'm going to approach them or actually try and screw them. Finding a younger woman/girl attractive isn't wrong as long as you don't act on it.

[EddyBeers]

Originally Posted by Bring_Back_Shantz

If we were wouldn't that make posting picutres of underaged girls okay?

That is true, when you are 12 it is not kiddie porn, it is just porn...

[stang]

Originally Posted by EddyBeers

That is true, when you are 12 it is not kiddie porn, it is just porn...

And 20 year olds are cougars

[Bring_Back_Shantz]

Originally Posted by EddyBeers

That is true, when you are 12 it is not kiddie porn, it is just porn...

Unfortunately it only works one way.
When you're 60, it's still granny porn.

[ok, ok,....I get it]

Originally Posted by Bring_Back_Shantz

Unfortunately it only works one way.
When you're 60, it's still granny porn.

[Itse]

Originally Posted by mikey_the_redneck

Men find young, pretty girls to be attractive. It's biological. It's wired into a part of us that is not under concious control. The smooth soft skin and hair,....the shiny eyes and perky body parts you know what I'm getting at here.

Some of you guys saying you would never hit some of the girls pictured in this thread...............who are you trying to fool here?
You are lying to yourselves.....

No, you're just lying to yourself so you wouldn't have to feel uncomfortable about your fantazies and you just believe anything you read that fits your world view.

It's also human nature to want delicious food. However, I wouldn't steal delicious food, because it's wrong and there are legal ways for me to get it.

I like sex with pretty women. I wouldn't do it with underage girls (now that I'm an old perverted ), because it's wrong, and I can have better sex with someone else.

That's the difference between human and animal, we have developed morals and logic, which have made the development of societies possible, which in turn has enabled all the cool stuff like internet.

You can also easily see, using the internet, that the most coveted female sex symbols in the world are mostly aged something like 20-24 (which is actually a less dangerous age to give birth than early puberty), and only rarely under 20, so that old argument about how men are wired to desire really young girls doesn't hold water.

Underage girls are not appealing because of their physical beauty but because of their perceived weakness. This is easy to see from the numerous pictures where obviously adult women are presented as sexy teenagers. If it was about the physical beauty of youth, those images would be pointless, because anyone can see those women are not really that young.

Men are generally drawn to images where women are presented as weak and vulnerable. It's not a coincidence that the overwhelming majority of tops are men (and the majority of bottoms are women). Youth are weak and vulnerable, and that to many men (and some women) is kind of appealing. However, because the youth are weak and vulnerable, society has seen it best to make it illegal for adults to take advantage of that.

...That was really a way too long answer for what was basically "oh come on, you know you want it".

[EddyBeers]

Originally Posted by Bring_Back_Shantz

Unfortunately it only works one way.
When you're 60, it's still granny porn.

Well at least with post-menopausal women, you do not have to worry about knocking them up

[Save Us Sutter]

Originally Posted by Ford Prefect

As the parent of a 17-year-old daughter, I agree completely with your assessment of the psychological development of someone that age (16). Even at 17 she's a lot more mature than she was at 16, but still a couple hard knocks short of being an adult. And at 14 or 15? That's is definitely pedophilia in my books and not something I find to be in good taste to joke about regardless of the context.

Hey Ford, in the interest of discussion, do you think your daughter will mature much more in the time until she turns 18? Do you think an 18 year old girl could handle a situation that a 17 year old couldn't?

Thinking about my own life, I grew up pretty fast and at 18 was more mature than most of my peers. I don't think I was an "adult" until 20-21 though.

I really think age is relative. I have a younger brother who's a bit of a "player" so I've met tons of 16-19 year old girls, most of them pretty attractive. Some of them were mature enough that you wouldn't question them if you met them in a bar and some of them should still be in grade school.

I don't know what my point is really. Quick, someone post a jailbait picture.

EDIT: Just want to make clear, that I have never actually attempted to taint the innocence of any of the girls, mature or not.