Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-16-2009, 08:58 PM   #121
flip
Lifetime Suspension
 
flip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sec 216
Exp:
Default

I will no longer be parking at the park n ride stations when I go to a Flames game until the nights are free as they should be.
flip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009, 09:16 PM   #122
Mad Mel
First Line Centre
 
Mad Mel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ford Prefect View Post
I moved out of Calgary 9 years ago after living there for 20 years, and sometimes I miss the place. BS like this cures me of that sentiment though. Condolences to all of you who have to put up with Bronco and his crap.
Similarly, I just moved last year after 8 years in Calgary. Paying for parking to use the crappiest train system in Canada. Awesome. Maybe the braintrust will use the money to build more street-level railway crossings in the downtown core.
Mad Mel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009, 01:51 AM   #123
Dan02
Franchise Player
 
Dan02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad Mel View Post
Paying for parking to use the crappiest train system in Canada. Awesome..
Haven't been to Edmonton i take it?
Dan02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009, 01:58 AM   #124
Dion
Not a casual user
 
Dion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
Exp:
Default Empty spaces dot Calgary LRT lot after fee imposed

Quote:
Side streets appeared to be filling up faster than the Somerset-Bridlewood transit parking lot this morning as commuters tried to dodge the $3 parking fee which came in today and three park-and-ride stations.

By 9 a.m. there were still plenty of spaces at the southernmost transit lot. Normally south-enders and out-of-towners fill it up by 7 a.m., regular lot users said.

“I haven’t even seen it this dead on weekends,” said Silverado resident Nicole, as her husband paid at the automated machine at a half-empty Somerset lot around 7:10 a.m
Quote:
And accordingly, lots further up the line at Fish Creek-Lacombe, Shawnessy and Canyon Meadows filled up earlier, with some drivers parking illegally on the grass, in supermarket lots or along any available patch of curb.
http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/ca...962/story.html
__________________
Dion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009, 02:18 AM   #125
Mad Mel
First Line Centre
 
Mad Mel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan02 View Post
Haven't been to Edmonton i take it?
Yup, many times. Their routes (or lack thereof) suck, but even Deadmonton figured out that it's better to put a train underground through the downtown core.

Maybe I've just spent too much of my life on 5th and 6th Aves in rush hour sitting there watching the train go by. Is that light on 5th (Bow Trail) where you enter downtown still a ridiculous sequence if you get there at the wrong time?
Mad Mel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009, 07:42 AM   #126
North East Goon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

Why should daytime parkers subsidize the night time and weekend parkers for essentially using the same service? If this is truly to upkeep the costs of said land, then everyone should have to chip in that is using this service - no?
North East Goon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009, 07:46 AM   #127
llama64
First Line Centre
 
llama64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: /dev/null
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by North East Goon View Post
Why should daytime parkers subsidize the night time and weekend parkers for essentially using the same service? If this is truly to upkeep the costs of said land, then everyone should have to chip in that is using this service - no?
Because there isn't demand for the spots at night/weekend.

Why should people who use the bus or walk to the transit subsidize those who drive?

Don't want to pay for parking, live closer to where you work.
llama64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009, 07:56 AM   #128
CFENT
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by llama64 View Post

Why should people who use the bus or walk to the transit subsidize those who drive?
I think you got it backwards. Why should people who drive have to subsidize people who take the bus. As was stated earlier, it is much more expensive to fuel and maintain all busses then to maintain a parking lot.

Last edited by CFENT; 03-17-2009 at 07:59 AM.
CFENT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009, 08:07 AM   #129
North East Goon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CFENT View Post
I think you got it backwards. Why should people who drive have to subsidize people who take the bus. As was stated earlier, it is much more expensive to fuel and maintain all busses then to maintain a parking lot.
Ding Ding Ding - we have a winner. The demand is lower evening and weekends - sure, but they are using the same service others have to pay for.
North East Goon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009, 08:26 AM   #130
Byrns
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Byrns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CFENT View Post
I think you got it backwards. Why should people who drive have to subsidize people who take the bus. As was stated earlier, it is much more expensive to fuel and maintain all busses then to maintain a parking lot.
Because all those cars driving pollutes, and we don't want that.

Byrns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009, 09:21 AM   #131
tvp2003
Franchise Player
 
tvp2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

City council have approved ditching the fee on evenings and weekends -- one day after the fee is implemented. Really just goes to show how well this whole thing has been thought out -- the optics are terrible.

EDIT: See below -- I'm not sure if it is official or not -- the article I cited below seems to say it is, but I'm not sure if that's entirely accurate...

Last edited by tvp2003; 03-17-2009 at 10:11 AM.
tvp2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009, 09:39 AM   #132
Bring_Back_Shantz
Franchise Player
 
Bring_Back_Shantz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: In my office, at the Ministry of Awesome!
Exp:
Default

I have to say that I am really glad that they instituted pay parking at the end of the lines.

I used to have to drive all the way to Brentwood because Dalhousie was right full way too early for me to get a spot there, so now instead of driving another 5-10 minutes (depending on traffic of course), and having to stand on the train because it is already full when it gets to Brentwood, I get to pay $3, park closer to my house, and I can sit down on my way to work.

That's a great deal! Thanks Calgary Transit!
__________________
THE SHANTZ WILL RISE AGAIN.
<-----Check the Badge bitches. You want some Awesome, you come to me!
Bring_Back_Shantz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009, 09:40 AM   #133
Bobblehead
Franchise Player
 
Bobblehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tvp2003 View Post
City council have approved ditching the fee on evenings and weekends -- one day after the fee is implemented. Really just goes to show how well this whole thing has been thought out -- the optics are terrible.
You sure on that? Do you have a source?
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
Bobblehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009, 10:08 AM   #134
tvp2003
Franchise Player
 
tvp2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobblehead View Post
You sure on that? Do you have a source?
EDIT: I re-read the article and I'm not sure if it's official -- it seems to be referring to the vote on Monday which I thought was just to reconsider...

Source: http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/Ca...558/story.html

Also, a recap of "Day 1" of the new fees: http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/Dr...570/story.html

Last edited by tvp2003; 03-17-2009 at 10:10 AM.
tvp2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009, 10:13 AM   #135
Bobblehead
Franchise Player
 
Bobblehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tvp2003 View Post
EDIT: I re-read the article and I'm not sure if it's official -- it seems to be referring to the vote on Monday which I thought was just to reconsider...

Source: http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/Ca...558/story.html

Also, a recap of "Day 1" of the new fees: http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/Dr...570/story.html
I only asked because yesterday that proposal was supposed to be sent for a study (to come back Apr 6) and THEN be voted on, but I agree this article says:
Quote:
Hours after a new $3 fee at transit park-and-ride lots took effect Monday, city council was already backtracking on that decision, voting to remove the charge during evenings and weekends.
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
Bobblehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009, 10:34 AM   #136
pepper24
Franchise Player
 
pepper24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by North East Goon View Post
Why should daytime parkers subsidize the night time and weekend parkers for essentially using the same service? If this is truly to upkeep the costs of said land, then everyone should have to chip in that is using this service - no?
During the weekdays demand far exceeds supply. Also, it's still cheaper to park and ride then park downtown in most cases.

During the weekends and evenings, the parking lots in most cases are half empty. Also, parking downtown is only $2 so it's technically cheaper to drive and park downtown not factoring in gas etc.

Is it fair? Not sure about that but it's smart on the city as supply and demand will justify it. It's just like how downtown can charge up to $40 per day during the weekdays but only $2 for the same spots in the evenings and weekends.
pepper24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009, 10:37 AM   #137
pepper24
Franchise Player
 
pepper24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flip View Post
I will no longer be parking at the park n ride stations when I go to a Flames game until the nights are free as they should be.
Vote is on Apr 6 and if passed will probably take a few weeks minimum to implement.

The Flames better make it to the 2nd or 3rd rounds!!!!
pepper24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009, 10:47 AM   #138
JohnnyO
Scoring Winger
 
JohnnyO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

I don't use the park and ride system except for the occasional sporting event.

Are these lots ticketed via the car with the cameras on it?

If they are and you park with you plate coverd (ie back into a stall as we don't require a front plate) , I don't see how you could get a ticket unless it is manually written up?
JohnnyO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009, 10:53 AM   #139
Boblobla
Franchise Player
 
Boblobla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyO View Post
I don't use the park and ride system except for the occasional sporting event.

Are these lots ticketed via the car with the cameras on it?

If they are and you park with you plate coverd (ie back into a stall as we don't require a front plate) , I don't see how you could get a ticket unless it is manually written up?
Which I am sure will happen, and since you made the metermaid get out of their car I am sure you get one of those special $50 parking tickets or something like that.
Boblobla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009, 10:57 AM   #140
Hack&Lube
Atomic Nerd
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
I believe the community can petition to get their neighborhood permit parking'ed, you guys parking there probably pissed off the residents enough that they got the city to put the signs in.
It's hard to explain, but the way it is happening, it doesn't look like a petition. The way the parking is, doesn't really affect the neighborhood. It looks more like some guy behind a city planning desk is arbitrarily zoning off more and more parking area until there is none left.
Hack&Lube is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:06 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy