Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-11-2009, 05:19 AM   #81
Displaced Flames fan
Franchise Player
 
Displaced Flames fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kalispell, Montana
Exp:
Default

Quote:
You do realize that every domestic dog or cat once came from a wild animal right?
No, really?

Quote:

The picture of the large cat I posted is of the most expensive domestic cat on the planet,(Ashera) but it is derived from 3 cats, 2 are totally wild (a Serval and a Leopard) and a domestic (most say from a Savannah with Seal Siamese) This cat is as smart and docsile as a golden lab,great with kids and lives 20 years. Perfect pet.(although expensive)
Are you saying this cat shouldn't be a pet? or that people shouldn't make money breeding them? I'm also told a Lynx/Bobcat has no wildness in it when breed out of the wild and make great pets..very gentle etc.

BTW, I'm on a 2 year waiting list to get a Hypoallergenic version of the Ashera and I think it'll be worth every penny

I was very clear in my post. If they are a WILD species then I am dead against it.

Hilarious that this comes from the guy that wants to kill people who hunt for sport. Does that murderous desire runover to those who hunt and make good use of the animal?

Why do you think it will be worth every penny out of curiosity? Status symbol? Lonely? Priceless LOL cats picks?
__________________
I am in love with Montana. For other states I have admiration, respect, recognition, even some affection, but with Montana it is love." - John Steinbeck
Displaced Flames fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 05:27 AM   #82
Swarly
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Swarly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Displaced Flames fan View Post

I was very clear in my post. If they are a WILD species then I am dead against it.
That part is very unclear. What do you consider a WILD species? All animals were at one time WILD. The only ones that are not are ones that we have tamed and trained and bred, probably for profit otherwise what is the point, much like the people on that website seem to be doing now with bobcats and lynx. Or are you saying you are against all forms of pets?
Swarly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 05:35 AM   #83
Displaced Flames fan
Franchise Player
 
Displaced Flames fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kalispell, Montana
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swarly View Post
That part is very unclear. What do you consider a WILD species? All animals were at one time WILD. The only ones that are not are ones that we have tamed and trained and bred, probably for profit otherwise what is the point, much like the people on that website seem to be doing now with bobcats and lynx. Or are you saying you are against all forms of pets?
A golden retriever was NEVER a wild species. Golden retrievers are descended from wild species.

It's pretty straight forward stuff unless you have absolutely zero experience dealing with the term species and what it means. I'm pretty sure every high school biology class deals with it though,.

The Ashera, by T@T's own defiinition, is not a wild species either.

Bobcats and Lynx clearly ARE.
__________________
I am in love with Montana. For other states I have admiration, respect, recognition, even some affection, but with Montana it is love." - John Steinbeck
Displaced Flames fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 06:59 AM   #84
Kool Keef
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Home
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T@T View Post
If a judge gave me 2 choices and only 2 choices to kill either the innocent animal or the goof who kills them I swear I would hunt down the hunter 10 times out of 10.
My money's on the hunter.
Kool Keef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 09:26 AM   #85
Gozer
Not the one...
 
Gozer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swarly View Post
That part is very unclear. What do you consider a WILD species? All animals were at one time WILD. The only ones that are not are ones that we have tamed and trained and bred, probably for profit otherwise what is the point, much like the people on that website seem to be doing now with bobcats and lynx. Or are you saying you are against all forms of pets?
Is this guy serious?
__________________
There's always two sides to an argument, and it's always a tie.
Gozer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 09:38 AM   #86
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gozer View Post
Is this guy serious?
It's not a bad point. Why was it only okay for animals to be domesticated in the past?
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 09:44 AM   #87
Gozer
Not the one...
 
Gozer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman View Post
It's not a bad point. Why was it only okay for animals to be domesticated in the past?
Its a bad point. DFF said he was wary of selling wild animals. Buddy jumps down his throat with garbage like "are you saying you are against all forms of pets?"

There are animals that have been domesticated and there are wild animals. Demanding a poster to clarify which are which and what constitutes "wild" is silly.
__________________
There's always two sides to an argument, and it's always a tie.
Gozer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 09:56 AM   #88
burn_this_city
Franchise Player
 
burn_this_city's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

To me anything captive bred is no longer considered a wild animal.
burn_this_city is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 09:57 AM   #89
ok, ok,....I get it
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: , location, location....
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burn_this_city View Post
To me anything captive bred is no longer considered a wild animal.
so circus lions and tigers......oh my!

BTW, these dudes disagree


Last edited by ok, ok,....I get it; 03-11-2009 at 10:02 AM.
ok, ok,....I get it is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 10:22 AM   #90
simonsays
Powerplay Quarterback
 
simonsays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

I think I'd consider Pinky the Cat a pretty wild animal.
simonsays is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 11:00 AM   #91
Boblobla
Franchise Player
 
Boblobla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I want a liger.

That is all.

Boblobla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 11:47 AM   #92
Thunderball
Franchise Player
 
Thunderball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boblobla View Post
I want a liger.

That is all.

What a gorgeous animal... and positively massive. Aren't these the largest cats?
Thunderball is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 11:47 AM   #93
Swarly
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Swarly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gozer View Post
Its a bad point. DFF said he was wary of selling wild animals. Buddy jumps down his throat with garbage like "are you saying you are against all forms of pets?"

There are animals that have been domesticated and there are wild animals. Demanding a poster to clarify which are which and what constitutes "wild" is silly.
I didnt mean to jump down DFF's throat, I just wanted to know where he stood. I'm not trying to be a jerk here or anything just wondering but I may have come off harsher than I meant too, it was 5.30am and I was just heading to bed.

He said it makes him ill that people are buying bobcats for pets now. Correct me if I am wrong, anybody on here who knows more about the history of pet species than me. But, breding these bobcats to be housepets would create a new species down the line, much like was done in the past to create the current dog and cat species that we now own as housepets.
Swarly is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Swarly For This Useful Post:
Old 03-11-2009, 11:50 AM   #94
Boblobla
Franchise Player
 
Boblobla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunderball View Post
What a gorgeous animal... and positively massive. Aren't these the largest cats?
It's pretty much my favorite animal. It's like a lion and a tiger mixed... bred for its skills in magic.
Boblobla is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Boblobla For This Useful Post:
Old 03-11-2009, 11:55 AM   #95
Thunderball
Franchise Player
 
Thunderball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swarly View Post
I didnt mean to jump down DFF's throat, I just wanted to know where he stood. I'm not trying to be a jerk here or anything just wondering but I may have come off harsher than I meant too, it was 5.30am and I was just heading to bed.

He said it makes him ill that people are buying bobcats for pets now. Correct me if I am wrong, anybody on here who knows more about the history of pet species than me. But, breding these bobcats to be housepets would create a new species down the line, much like was done in the past to create the current dog and cat species that we now own as housepets.
Pretty much. This is what has led to "Designer" Cats, like the Ocicat and Bengals being derived from wild cats like bobcats, cheetahs (don't ask me how) and ocelots. People wanting the allure of a wildcat, and the domestication of a typical cat. I'd love to get a Bengal if they weren't so pricey (~$800) and there weren't so many regular cats needing good homes. Apparently they are like having a dog and cat at the same time.
Thunderball is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 12:06 PM   #96
octothorp
Franchise Player
 
octothorp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: not lurking
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swarly View Post
I didnt mean to jump down DFF's throat, I just wanted to know where he stood. I'm not trying to be a jerk here or anything just wondering but I may have come off harsher than I meant too, it was 5.30am and I was just heading to bed.

He said it makes him ill that people are buying bobcats for pets now. Correct me if I am wrong, anybody on here who knows more about the history of pet species than me. But, breding these bobcats to be housepets would create a new species down the line, much like was done in the past to create the current dog and cat species that we now own as housepets.
I'm not sure you'd get a different species as such, but selectively breeding them as pets will, over many generations, produce animals that are more acclimatized to domesticated life. In the meantime, you've got many generations of potentially unhappy animals. The website originally quoted says that it's okay because bobcats and lynx 'sleep 17 hours a day', but to me that's not sufficient to say it would be happy living in a domestic environment.
Go down to the zoo and have a look at the bobcat and lynx exhibits; the habitats they put these animals in are not simply for the benefit of the viewers; in a lot of cases, the best zoos have put a lot of study into what it takes for an animal to be content in captivity. They know the minimum amount of range that an animal needs. If you can't provide this same sort of experience, you shouldn't be looking at owning one of these pets.

My own personal take on it would be that there's a bit of human arrogance in trying to domesticate all of these wild species of animals. There's no denying that there are a lot of animals out there that would hypothetically make really cool pets (my own choice would be to have sea otters, and not just because I watched Danger Bay a lot growing up), but is any animal really better off living in a domesticated environment, unless it's an injured creature that can no longer survive in the wild?
octothorp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 12:43 PM   #97
malcolmk14
Franchise Player
 
malcolmk14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Exp:
Default

I really want a House Hippo.

Isn't it really cool to think that in maybe 100 years there will actually be mini-versions of some of these large animals, and you could have an 18 inch tall Hippo as a pet!? I hope I'm around to see this.

Last edited by malcolmk14; 03-11-2009 at 12:45 PM.
malcolmk14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 12:43 PM   #98
Gozer
Not the one...
 
Gozer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

I'd take a wee bear.
__________________
There's always two sides to an argument, and it's always a tie.
Gozer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 12:48 PM   #99
Coach
Franchise Player
 
Coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

i want a cheetah
__________________
Coach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 01:14 PM   #100
JiriHrdina
I believe in the Pony Power
 
JiriHrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by malcolmk14 View Post
I really want a House Hippo.

Isn't it really cool to think that in maybe 100 years there will actually be mini-versions of some of these large animals, and you could have an 18 inch tall Hippo as a pet!? I hope I'm around to see this.
They already exist: the pygmy hippo.
JiriHrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:23 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy