Official Superbowl Thread! Superbowl XLIII! Superbowl! - Page 6 - Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Daradon · 02-01-2009, 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PIMking

Because the refs couldnt find a retarted penalty to call agianst the cards..

And which team are you cheering for? lol

Arizona has deserved the penalties I've seen. That late hit on the punt holder was just STUPID!

PIMking · 02-01-2009, 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rubecube

Please. I'm no Pittsburgh homer, but it's pretty obvious that Arizona has not shown up to play.

Really im not a cards fan but they started out bad but came back with alot of momentum. Its funny that these weak roughing the passer calls are going one way. or the ref was sure it was a fumble not an incomplete pass and they had to review it.

tell me what side the refs are on. the games not over yet but not looking good for the cards. besides the commercials suck this year.

PIMking · 02-01-2009, 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daradon

And which team are you cheering for? lol

Arizona has deserved the penalties I've seen. That late hit on the punt holder was just STUPID!

He was stumbling foward.. come on! the ref acted like he didnt even slow up and drilled the guy. this is football for christ sakes.

GirlySports · 02-01-2009, 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daradon

And which team are you cheering for? lol

Arizona has deserved the penalties I've seen. That late hit on the punt holder was just STUPID!

I've never seen a penalty on running the holder!

Why are we all still watching this?
The sooner this ends the better

I've got the under/44.5

Machiavelli · 02-01-2009, 07:02 PM

^ What a random rant.

Displaced Flames fan · 02-01-2009, 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PIMking

Really im not a cards fan but they started out bad but came back with alot of momentum. Its funny that these weak roughing the passer calls are going one way. or the ref was sure it was a fumble not an incomplete pass and they had to review it.

tell me what side the refs are on. the games not over yet but not looking good for the cards. besides the commercials suck this year.

Weak roughing the passer call? Dansby PUSHED Roethlisberger. That takes action, it's not a matter of not being able to stop. Once you make an action seperate from your run your argument for momentum is lost.

moon · 02-01-2009, 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PIMking

this is the worst officiated game i have ever seen.

The NFL didnt want arizona to win the super bowl. so they are making sure that they wont. the Pick for a td in the 2nd quarter was down at the 1 yard line.

The refs wanted the Steelers to win so bad that they overturned that TD call on the first drive and made them kick a FG! Those tricky s, always screwing the Cards.

Quote:

Originally Posted by PIMking

Oh yeah why didnt they call the santonio holmes holding on Warner when he threw the pick at the end of the 2nd? you cant tackle a guy when your blocking him..

Did Holmes run on the field and hold Warner? If so he should get a lot worse than a holding call.

The Cards should have paid the refs like the SEC teams do before their BCS bowl games. It isn't always enough to overcome the crappy SEC play but it seems to help more than it hurts.

Displaced Flames fan · 02-01-2009, 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PIMking

He was stumbling foward.. come on! the ref acted like he didnt even slow up and drilled the guy. this is football for christ sakes.

I'm with you on that one, but the ref may not have seen the stumble. It happens. Inconsequential anyway.

PIMking · 02-01-2009, 07:04 PM

the cards offensive line couldnt block a cold. its like an offensive line full of luango's

Daradon · 02-01-2009, 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PIMking

He was stumbling foward.. come on! the ref acted like he didnt even slow up and drilled the guy. this is football for christ sakes.

Didn't look that way to me. Meh. Even if it wasn't intentional it still coulda been called. Happens all the time. To say it wasn't a penalty or SHOULDN'T have ben a penalty is a little weak IMO.

atb · 02-01-2009, 07:05 PM

If Arizona has any hope of getting back into this, they need to get the ball to Fitzgerald. Take some risks and throw the ball up for him. It's absurd that they're just giving the ball to James for the short yards when they're down 20-7. The coaches need to wake up and realize this isn't a close game anymore.

Joborule · 02-01-2009, 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PIMking

this is the worst officiated game i have ever seen.

The NFL didnt want arizona to win the super bowl. so they are making sure that they wont. the Pick for a td in the 2nd quarter was down at the 1 yard line.

You've got to be kidding me...

PIMking · 02-01-2009, 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by moon

The refs wanted the Steelers to win so bad that they overturned that TD call on the first drive and made them kick a FG! Those tricky s, always screwing the Cards.

Did Holmes run on the field and hold Warner? If so he should get a lot worse than a holding call.

The Cards should have paid the refs like the SEC teams do before their BCS bowl games. It isn't always enough to overcome the crappy SEC play but it seems to help more than it hurts.

Im just ranting because it seems that im the only guy that doesnt want the steelers to win. Either way I can care less. I just want a good game not another go thru the motions games. SEC? seriously the best conferance over the last decade if not two and you say that?

Machiavelli · 02-01-2009, 07:07 PM

Yeah, it's amazing how much of a non-factor Fitzgerald has been. Biggest possible game, you go with your big-time players.

PIMking · 02-01-2009, 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joborule

You've got to be kidding me...

Its taking you guys a long enough time...

the Cards havent taken a shot down field the whole game and james seems to be a step ahead or behind on the hand offs.

GirlySports · 02-01-2009, 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Machiavelli

Yeah, it's amazing how much of a non-factor Fitzgerald has been. Biggest possible game, you go with your big-time players.

He's been double-covered and coaches are scared to throw the ball to him.

Have they shown the GI Joe movie trailler on CTV? That looks AWESOME!

moon · 02-01-2009, 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PIMking

Im just ranting because it seems that im the only guy that doesnt want the steelers to win. Either way I can care less. I just want a good game not another go thru the motions games.

The only guy that wants Arizona to win?

Did you hear the media this week, they couldn't stop coming up with a million reasons why the Cardinals were going to win. The poll in this very thread has the Cardinals picked over the Steelers.

GirlySports · 02-01-2009, 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PIMking

Its taking you guys a long enough time...

the Cards havent taken a shot down field the whole game and james seems to be a step ahead or behind on the hand offs.

Cards have only themselves to blame. They lost this game even before the kickoff. All those things they did to win the previous three games they've thrown out the window. They head coach used to be a Steelers coordinator so he's scared of the 'mystic'. Cards are really playing scared even down by 13.

rubecube · 02-01-2009, 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Machiavelli

Yeah, it's amazing how much of a non-factor Fitzgerald has been. Biggest possible game, you go with your big-time players.

I'm just surprised they've been so conservative. Take one or two big shots and I guarantee Fitzgerald makes some plays.

Displaced Flames fan · 02-01-2009, 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GirlySports

He's been double-covered and coaches are scared to throw the ball to him.

Exactly. Fitzgerald is taking one for the team tonight. They got it to Breaston and Boldin early, but not so much lately. They need to.