View Poll Results: There can be only one.
|
Steelers
|
  
|
42 |
40.78% |
Cardinals
|
  
|
47 |
45.63% |
This is option number 3
|
  
|
14 |
13.59% |
01-23-2009, 09:18 PM
|
#1
|
The new goggles also do nothing.
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Official Superbowl Thread! Superbowl XLIII! Superbowl!
As requested.
I had to Google who was in it.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to photon For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-23-2009, 09:42 PM
|
#2
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: @HOOT250
|
I believe my Cards can pull this one off if they can play like the last few weeks.
GO CARDS GO!!!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by henriksedin33
Not at all, as I've said, I would rather start with LA over any of the other WC playoff teams. Bunch of underachievers who look good on paper but don't even deserve to be in the playoffs.
|
|
|
|
01-23-2009, 09:58 PM
|
#3
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Go Cards!
|
|
|
01-24-2009, 10:02 AM
|
#4
|
One of the Nine
|
Go Cardinals!! Booooooo Sh1ttsburgh...
|
|
|
01-24-2009, 10:17 AM
|
#5
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
|
Thanks for option #3.
The Steelers got thier last Superbowl delivered to them from the men in stripes..as a SEA fan it'll be almost as hard to watch them probably walk over a team that only beat one playoff team all regular season and probably won't make the playoffs next year.
|
|
|
01-24-2009, 10:22 AM
|
#6
|
n00b!
|
I think Steelers win this one by two TDs.
|
|
|
01-24-2009, 11:25 AM
|
#7
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Portland, OR
|
I'm rooting for Arizona, but I think the Steelers will get it done. If the Cards can score 24+ they have a chance.
If AZ does win, I think their secondary could be the story.
|
|
|
01-24-2009, 11:58 AM
|
#8
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
I'm just trying to decide whether Arizona's offense can score enough on Pittsburgh's D to beat the 6.5 spread.
EDIT: Make that seven. If the line keeps moving towards Pittsburgh then I'm definitely betting on Arizona.
Last edited by rubecube; 01-24-2009 at 12:00 PM.
|
|
|
01-24-2009, 03:22 PM
|
#9
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary
|
I'm hoping for Arizona but I think the Steelers will be too much for them to handle.
What's not to like about Kurt Warner?
|
|
|
01-25-2009, 09:57 AM
|
#10
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by browna
Thanks for option #3.
The Steelers got thier last Superbowl delivered to them from the men in stripes..as a SEA fan it'll be almost as hard to watch them probably walk over a team that only beat one playoff team all regular season and probably won't make the playoffs next year.
|
Gotta love bitter Canucks...err Seahawks fans.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but haven't the Cardinals beat three playoff teams the past three weeks? Clearly that's not as important as what they did in the regular season.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to JayP For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-25-2009, 10:29 AM
|
#11
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Its pretty hard to bet against the Cards +7, given what they've done over the past few weeks. Philly looked good going into that game and the Cards handled them pretty well.
|
|
|
01-27-2009, 12:21 PM
|
#12
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: @HOOT250
|
5 more sleeps...
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by henriksedin33
Not at all, as I've said, I would rather start with LA over any of the other WC playoff teams. Bunch of underachievers who look good on paper but don't even deserve to be in the playoffs.
|
|
|
|
01-27-2009, 02:01 PM
|
#13
|
Appealing my suspension
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Just outside Enemy Lines
|
I think the Steelers will win the game, but I'd love to see the Cardinals win it. Kurt Warners had a Hall of Fame calibre career but people still don't regard him as a Hall of Fame guy. Odd since I think he's got a great career winning percentage, the highest number of 300 yard games in terms of percentage with a minimum 100 starts. If he wins this game he becomes a very rare QB to lead two different teams to Superbowl wins and would cement himself as a sure fire Hall of Fame guy.
__________________
"Some guys like old balls"
Patriots QB Tom Brady
|
|
|
01-27-2009, 02:19 PM
|
#14
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chiefs Kingdom, Yankees Universe, C of Red.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sylvanfan
I think the Steelers will win the game, but I'd love to see the Cardinals win it. Kurt Warners had a Hall of Fame calibre career but people still don't regard him as a Hall of Fame guy. Odd since I think he's got a great career winning percentage, the highest number of 300 yard games in terms of percentage with a minimum 100 starts. If he wins this game he becomes a very rare QB to lead two different teams to Superbowl wins and would cement himself as a sure fire Hall of Fame guy.
|
Has any other QB ever done that? Going quickly from Memory, I can't think of anybody. (I apolagize for the spelling)
Starr
Namath
Dawson
(was Unitas with the Colts when they won Super Bowl 5?)
Staubach
Gressie
Bradshaw
Stabler
Plunkett
Montana
Thiesman
Williams
McMahn
Simms
Hostetler (I know terrible spelling)
Aikman
Young
Favre
Elway
Warner
Dilfer
Johnson
Brady
Rothlisberger
Peyton Manning
Eli Manning
Did I miss anybody?
__________________
|
|
|
01-27-2009, 02:37 PM
|
#15
|
Appealing my suspension
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Just outside Enemy Lines
|
I was trying to think of a QB who has and I can't think of anyone off hand either. I don't think theres been many guys lead two teams to the big game either. I can go back to Ken Anderson of the 81 Bengals and not find a losing QB who's lead a different team to the Superbowl. Anderson, Theisman, Marino, Grogan, Elway, Esiason, Kelly, Humphries, O'Donnel, Bledsoe, Farve, Chandler, McNair, Collins, Warner, Gannon, Delhomme, McNabb, Hasselback, Grossman, Brady. I n the 70's Tarkenton lost a lot of Superbowl's, Staubach lost a couple. I can't think of anyone who's even lead 2 teams to the Superbowl....have to be missing someone.
__________________
"Some guys like old balls"
Patriots QB Tom Brady
Last edited by Sylvanfan; 01-27-2009 at 02:43 PM.
|
|
|
01-27-2009, 03:00 PM
|
#16
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chiefs Kingdom, Yankees Universe, C of Red.
|
I think the closest example of that would be the QB for the Broncos the year they lost to the Dallas Cowboys in the 70's. He and Staubach were rotated early on in the season the Cowboys won Super Bowl 6. Landry would rotate them drive by drive during the game. But he didn't start and maybe didn't even play in Super Bowl 6.
__________________
|
|
|
01-27-2009, 04:22 PM
|
#17
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 161 St. - Yankee Stadium
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sylvanfan
I think the Steelers will win the game, but I'd love to see the Cardinals win it. Kurt Warners had a Hall of Fame calibre career but people still don't regard him as a Hall of Fame guy. Odd since I think he's got a great career winning percentage, the highest number of 300 yard games in terms of percentage with a minimum 100 starts. If he wins this game he becomes a very rare QB to lead two different teams to Superbowl wins and would cement himself as a sure fire Hall of Fame guy.
|
Rare indeed. The population of that club would be 1.
There is only 1 other QB that has led his team to 2 Superbowl appearances as a starter.
That would be Craig Morton with Dallas in 1970 and Denver in 1977. (Old #7 lost with Denver).
Last edited by JBR; 01-27-2009 at 04:25 PM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to JBR For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-27-2009, 04:26 PM
|
#18
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chiefs Kingdom, Yankees Universe, C of Red.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBR
Rare indeed. The population of that club would be 1.
There is only 1 other QB that has led his team to 2 Superbowl appearances (both losses). That would be Craig Morton with Dallas in 1970 and Denver in 1977.
|
So Craig would have started Super Bowl 5 in the lose to Baltimore. He was the QB I was thinking of for Super Bowl 6 and 11.
__________________
|
|
|
01-28-2009, 01:24 PM
|
#19
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
|
I dont think this is worth its own thread, but what is good Superbowl food.
I am definately going to costco to pick up some wings, but I am wondering what else.
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
|
|
|
01-28-2009, 06:00 PM
|
#20
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: still in edmonton
|
Steelers because I refuse to admit that the Cardinals are in the Superbowl.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Yeah_Baby For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:43 PM.
|
|