| 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-21-2009, 09:27 AM | #1 |  
	| It's not easy being green! 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: In the tubes to Vancouver Island      | 
				 Text Messaging.. 
 
			
			Why do mobile providers charge so damn much for text messaging?
 It's got to be the most blatant ripoff to consumers today. 25 CENTS FOR A TINY BIT OF DATA!!!
 
				__________________Who is in charge of this product and why haven't they been fired yet?
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-21-2009, 09:29 AM | #2 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Income Tax Central      | 
 
			
			Because they can.  Time for a revolution people, lets get an angry mob at the Telus building.  I'll bring the torches, whos bringing the pitchforks?
 I'd love to see if that actually worked.
 
				__________________The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
 
 This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
 
 The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans
 
 If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-21-2009, 09:32 AM | #3 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Oklahoma - Where  they call a puck a ball...      | 
 
			
			25 cents a text??? WOW  do they have an unlimited plan at telus??? I know i pay 20 bucks a month for unlimited at At&t here in the states
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-21-2009, 09:34 AM | #4 |  
	| One of the Nine | 
 
			
			Yeah, dude... Get on an unlimited plan. I love text, as I already clarified in the other text thread. It's well worth it to get the unlimited plan. It's like $15 or $20 at Rogers.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-21-2009, 09:36 AM | #5 |  
	| Playboy Mansion Poolboy 
				 
				Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Close enough to make a beer run during a TV timeout      | 
 
			
			I guess I don't see it that way.  It's 25¢ for you to use their infastructure that is in place without committing to supporting that infastructure long term.  For me I pay $5 for text and Internet; so basically once I saw that I was going to be using texting on a regular basis I went with their value option.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-21-2009, 09:37 AM | #6 |  
	| First Line Centre | 
 
			
			Canadian cell phone companies rip off the Canadian consumers so bad, I think they are falsely keeping prices inflated.  Look at what you can get in the States, unlimited everything for 99 bucks a month, I get really heated about this issue for some reason.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-21-2009, 09:38 AM | #7 |  
	| Has lived the dream! 
				 
				Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Where I lay my head is home...      | 
 
			
			Just get an unlimited.  It's often just 10 extra bucks with other plans.
 The reason Canadian cell phone companies charge so much compared to Europe is because there is so much network to cover such a large area with so few people.
 
 Even the U.S. has 9 times the people in a slightly smaller area.
 
 Just one con of living in Canada.  But look at it this way.  We get to enjoy all this wide open space and nature.  Small price to pay for how lucky we are.
 
				 Last edited by Daradon; 01-21-2009 at 09:43 AM.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to Daradon For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-21-2009, 09:40 AM | #8 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			wow... I pay $25/month for a plan and it includes unlimited Text Messaging... I'm with Fido.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-21-2009, 09:43 AM | #9 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			http://www.physorg.com/news129793047.html
Take it with a grain of salt, but this article claims that texting charges are four times more expensive than receiving scientific data from space.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-21-2009, 09:44 AM | #10 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Calgary      | 
 
			
			Apparently text messaging costs carriers $0.00, or so I heard yesterday.
 I'll be getting the unlimited plan from Rogers when I sign my new deal today.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-21-2009, 09:57 AM | #11 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Violating Copyrights      | 
 
			
			^^Yup. Whether or not the network is sending or receiving texts, the network is sending the exact same thing. Text messages piggyback on signals that are sent anyways.
 F'ing s.
 
 .25/144kb=0.00174cents/kb
 
 1024x1024x0.00174=  $1,820.43 per mb of text messaging.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-21-2009, 10:05 AM | #12 |  
	| First Line Centre | 
 
			
			But where did that network and infrastructure come from? Magic.
 Not to defend the telecoms as I believe there is a special place in hell for them, but just because the end result does not add an additional cost, there ares so many overhead items that need to be paid for. Wires, towers, servers, r and d, handset subsidies and on and on and on.
 
 There is a big picture involved. In  the States they have so many more subscribers to spread the overhead around. The price we pay for being here.
 
 The question would be why do we not let the us carriers sell here? Let's tap into their economies of scale and we all win right? There is the sovereignty thing but is that more important than cheap text?
 
 Wow. That was a lot to say about something I don't actually care about. I must have had too much coffee this am.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to Titan For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-21-2009, 10:07 AM | #13 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Vancouver      | 
 
			
			Yeah, with Fido there is no incoming text fee and with their $25 plan you get unlimited text and evenings and weekends.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-21-2009, 10:09 AM | #14 |  
	| Scoring Winger 
				 
				Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Calgary      | 
 
			
			No to derail the thread but does Blackberry Messenger charge as texts or is it just counted as data?
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-21-2009, 10:15 AM | #15 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			I'm pretty sure it's data and since 1 letter is 1byte it's wicked cheap...similar to the pin msging.
		 
				__________________   |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-21-2009, 10:20 AM | #16 |  
	| Playboy Mansion Poolboy 
				 
				Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Close enough to make a beer run during a TV timeout      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Titan  But where did that network and infrastructure come from? Magic. |  
Agreed.  To say that it should be free because the bandwidth is already there and would be used no matter what is like saying that airfares should be free or close to it, because the airlines are going that way way anyways.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-21-2009, 10:25 AM | #17 |  
	| Has lived the dream! 
				 
				Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Where I lay my head is home...      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Titan   The question would be why do we not let the us carriers sell here? Let's tap into their economies of scale and we all win right? There is the sovereignty thing but is that more important than cheap text?
 
 |  
Yup, that's about the only thing that would help, and those in charge of the decisions are slowly opening up the doors for more companies and competition.  We might be able to spread it around a little more if a company like Verizon came up here.  Although, it probably wouldn't be much of a discount because they're not going to increase the fees to their existing customers in the States just because they have expansion plans here.  IE, their Canadian prices will still probably be higher than their US prices.
 
But there will be more companies.  Virgin is already here.  And the prices will go down.  It just takes time.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-21-2009, 10:36 AM | #18 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			HIt 'em where it hurts. Let's all stop text messaging until the rates come down. How many of you could do it? I could. Seriously. I send very few messages so it wouldn't be a hardship for me at all. I like talking with people.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-21-2009, 11:16 AM | #19 |  
	| It's not easy being green! 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: In the tubes to Vancouver Island      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Titan  But where did that network and infrastructure come from? Magic. |  
This is what bugs me though. I'd say that over the years of paying my BILL I've more than supported the network and infrastructure. It's the same thing with long distance charges now. Long distance means nothing in the digital age. Paying for it now days is a ripoff for the consumer.
 
With the data content in text messages and understanding how those systems would likely work for transmitting the data, the network and infrastructure costs are negligible for providers and I personally think that the excuse is way out of date now.
		 
				__________________Who is in charge of this product and why haven't they been fired yet?
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-21-2009, 01:41 PM | #20 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: May 2006 Location: @HOOT250      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by The Ditch  Canadian cell phone companies rip off the Canadian consumers so bad, I think they are falsely keeping prices inflated. Look at what you can get in the States, unlimited everything for 99 bucks a month, I get really heated about this issue for some reason. |  
Most USA carriers charge $0.20 for incoming and outgoing text messages, Canadian carrers charge $0.15 for incoming and outgoing text messages.
  
Companies like Sprint may have these $99 unlimited packages but they also have more customers than the population of Canada, so I would say that helps keep costs down.
  
What's there to be heated about? A company making profits...damn them, when I signed up they told me it was a charity outfit    
				__________________ 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by henriksedin33  Not at all, as I've said, I would rather  start with LA over any of the other WC playoff teams.  Bunch of  underachievers who look good on paper but don't even deserve to be in  the playoffs. |  |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to HOOT For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:58 PM. | 
 
 
 |