01-21-2009, 07:19 AM
|
#1
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Are you wealthy?
Well you are going to LOVE this!
Non-wealthy folk please move on...no news for you here!
The link
Hey Fotze...make sure you pass this on to your wife!
|
|
|
|
01-21-2009, 07:43 AM
|
#2
|
|
Franchise Player
|
No wonder I can never pleasure my woman...
|
|
|
|
|
01-21-2009, 08:07 AM
|
#3
|
|
Don't click that link!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Rural Alberta
|
Good thing I measure my wealth according to how many people I've clubbed.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to alan21 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
01-21-2009, 08:18 AM
|
#4
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Spartanville
|
I've no money in the bank but piles in my arse.
|
|
|
|
|
01-21-2009, 08:21 AM
|
#5
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Americas hat
|
A interesting question of
A interesting question of relevance for a business magazine that has a proportionately higher number of men readers than women. I mean who really cares whether woman even achieve the big O as long as we get what we want... isnt this story is more suited to the womans weeklys!
Best comment evAr!
|
|
|
|
|
01-21-2009, 08:28 AM
|
#6
|
 Posted the 6 millionth post! |
I just finished writing a magazine article on how often women actually need sex. I suppose this could have been another variable I should have used; the more greenbacks you have, the more humpbacks you get.
|
|
|
|
|
01-21-2009, 08:32 AM
|
#7
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Americas hat
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame
I just finished writing a magazine article on how often women actually need sex. I suppose this could have been another variable I should have used; the more greenbacks you have, the more humpbacks you get.
|
that would be a whale of a tale...
I'm so sorry for that... 
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to jeremywilhelm For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
01-21-2009, 08:40 AM
|
#8
|
|
Chick Magnet
|
I fowarded to a wise friend.
Quote:
|
“Increasing partner income had a highly positive effect on women’s self-reported frequency of orgasm. More desirable mates cause women to experience more orgasms”, said Dr Pollet to the Times Online.
|
His response:
Those women just want to keep the taps turned on... so they fake it. Us poor folk still know how to. . . .
|
|
|
|
|
01-21-2009, 08:47 AM
|
#9
|
|
NOT breaking news
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame
I just finished writing a magazine article on how often women actually need sex. I suppose this could have been another variable I should have used; the more greenbacks you have, the more humpbacks you get.
|
Women don't like sex and never talk about it. It's taboo.
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire
|
|
|
|
|
01-21-2009, 09:23 AM
|
#10
|
|
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
|
Money can't buy me love
|
|
|
|
|
01-21-2009, 09:24 AM
|
#11
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlySports
Women don't like sex and never talk about it. It's taboo.
|
...And don't ever change. Breaking that taboo is man's life mission.
|
|
|
|
01-21-2009, 09:30 AM
|
#12
|
|
NOT breaking news
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta
...And don't ever change. Breaking that taboo is man's life mission.
|
Not much of a mission these days!
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire
|
|
|
|
|
01-21-2009, 09:32 AM
|
#13
|
Posted the 6 millionth post! |
Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlySports
Women don't like sex and never talk about it. It's taboo.
|
Actually, the only one's who don't talk about sex when everyone else around the table is are the virgins. 
|
|
|
|
|
01-21-2009, 09:33 AM
|
#14
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Your Mother's Place.
|
Nice to see my Alma Mater in the news for all their groundbreaking research...
|
|
|
|
|
01-21-2009, 10:04 AM
|
#15
|
|
Has Towel, Will Travel
|
I thought, um, length and girth had a lot to do with it. Does it follow logically then that men with length and girth are more successful financially?
Edit: To head off SA remarks, I'm moderately well off, but not filthy rich. Financially that is.
|
|
|
|
|
01-21-2009, 10:09 AM
|
#16
|
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman
Money can't buy me love
|
Follow along. We are not talking about love. Money can buy lots and lots of sex. 
|
|
|
|
|
01-21-2009, 10:15 AM
|
#17
|
|
Pants Tent
|
I'm a university student.Enough said.
Maybe that is linked to why I'm single lol.
__________________
KIPPER IS KING
|
|
|
|
|
01-21-2009, 10:26 AM
|
#18
|
|
Franchise Player
|
As the MoneyGuy I felt I had to look. Suspicions confirmed....
|
|
|
|
|
01-21-2009, 11:12 AM
|
#19
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: 30 minutes from the Red Mile
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wookie
I fowarded to a wise friend.
His response:
Those women just want to keep the taps turned on... so they fake it. Us poor folk still know how to. . . .
|
I tend to agree with the following...why would the guy care as long as he gets what he wants?
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremywilhelm
A interesting question of
A interesting question of relevance for a business magazine that has a proportionately higher number of men readers than women. I mean who really cares whether woman even achieve the big O as long as we get what we want... isnt this story is more suited to the womans weeklys!
Best comment evAr!
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-21-2009, 11:16 AM
|
#20
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: not lurking
|
Anyone want to guess what the results would be if they reversed the study to look at what how successful wealthy women are with giving men an orgasm? I'd guess the results would be something like this:
wealthy women: 99.5%
poor women: 99.5%
reasonably clean tube sock (control): 99.3%
Actually, you can probably use any sample of women or comfortable inanimate objects, and the results would be more or less the same. Which probably has to do with the evolutionary anthropology that the article talks about: we're just not wired for discriminating mate selection. All of this isn't to suggest that all women are equally proficient; just that any quantitative models of analysis are far less effective for studying the male orgasm.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:52 PM.
|
|
