Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-17-2008, 02:20 PM   #1
Finner
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Edmonton
Exp:
Default Ontario to Gain Seats in Parliament

From : http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servl.../politics/home

Quote:
TORONTO — Ontario will no longer be shortchanged under the Harper government's plan to add new seats to the House of Commons, says Premier Dalton McGuinty.
Prime Minister Stephen Harper has agreed to revise his proposed legislation, which is designed to reflect population growth across Canada by adding new seats to the 308 currently in the Commons, Mr. McGuinty said on Thursday.
“I spoke to Harper about this, and I think we fixed it,” Mr. McGuinty said at a year-end news conference.
He did not elaborate on exactly how many seats would be added in Ontario under the proposed changes but said, “we will get the necessary proportionality.” That translates into another 21 seats in Ontario, bringing the tally for the province to 127, a government official confirmed.
Nothing about Alberta but I would assume we would get more as well.
Finner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2008, 02:27 PM   #2
flip
Lifetime Suspension
 
flip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sec 216
Exp:
Default

I would imagine the Ontario gains would have as much to do with fairness as it does with gaining a majority in the next election. As such Alberta should gain more too.
flip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2008, 02:38 PM   #3
Rerun
Often Thinks About Pickles
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Okotoks
Exp:
Default

If we are being fair about all this proportionality, shouldn't PEI be reduced to 1 seat from their current 4?
Rerun is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Rerun For This Useful Post:
Old 12-17-2008, 02:53 PM   #4
flip
Lifetime Suspension
 
flip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sec 216
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rerun View Post
If we are being fair about all this proportionality, shouldn't PEI be reduced to 1 seat from their current 4?
I say we get rid of the maritimes all together.

Sorry HD and Qscout.
flip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2008, 03:05 PM   #5
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rerun View Post
If we are being fair about all this proportionality, shouldn't PEI be reduced to 1 seat from their current 4?
Unfortunately, Harper can't legislate that. It would require a constitutional ammendment, as the constitution says that PEI is to have four senators, and no province can have fewer MPs than Senators.

Though if he could do that, I would have loved to see him reduce Newfoundland to one MP, just to send Danny Williams in a tizzy.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2008, 03:06 PM   #6
ok, ok,....I get it
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: , location, location....
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rerun View Post
If we are being fair about all this proportionality, shouldn't PEI be reduced to 1 seat from their current 4?

I say we get a federal version of the kids card table at family dinners. put PEI, NB, NS and NFLD at that table. They can only speak when spoken to.
ok, ok,....I get it is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2008, 03:07 PM   #7
ok, ok,....I get it
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: , location, location....
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flip View Post
I say we get rid of the maritimes all together.

Sorry HD and Qscout.
if we loose them all together our military will drop by a 1/3...however our collective IQ may rise by 2/3......
ok, ok,....I get it is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2008, 03:12 PM   #8
calculoso
Franchise Player
 
calculoso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

I'd rather that they reduce the number of MPs instead of increase them, but that would be a political no-go. Can you imagine the uproar anywhere if they had 5-10 MPs taken away? Total non-starter, even if it would be the best thing in terms of cost and effectiveness.

Ontario's whole point was 2 fold:
- "it's only fair"... who said anything about fairness?
- "It's about equality" ... who said anything in Canada was equal?
calculoso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2008, 03:15 PM   #9
Rerun
Often Thinks About Pickles
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Okotoks
Exp:
Default

Where's everybody going to sit?

Lets see now... they promised Ontario 21 new seats, they've promised BC another 7 seats, and Alberta has been promised 5 more. Thats 33 more seats, for a total of 341.
Rerun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2008, 03:28 PM   #10
bluntus logicimus
Backup Goalie
 
bluntus logicimus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: ABC
Exp:
Default

Just some food for thought.

The UK House of Commons currently has 646 seats (the number varies slightly from time to time to reflect population change). This is a large legislature by international standards. For instance, the House of Representatives in the USA has 435 seats.

The UK population is 60 million
The U.S.A. population is 301 million
__________________
Denigration avoids reflecting pools
bluntus logicimus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2008, 03:31 PM   #11
Madman
Franchise Player
 
Madman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ok, ok,....I get it View Post
if we loose them all together our military will drop by a 1/3...however our collective IQ may rise by 2/3......
It's painfully funny you pointed out their low IQ while using the word loose instead of lose.

Madman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2008, 03:33 PM   #12
ok, ok,....I get it
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: , location, location....
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Madman View Post
It's painfully funny you pointed out their low IQ while using the word loose instead of lose.

yes...yes...it is....typing, speaking on phone, and breathing it one too many tasks......still I stand by my statement.
ok, ok,....I get it is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2008, 03:55 PM   #13
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluntus logicimus View Post
Just some food for thought.

The UK House of Commons currently has 646 seats (the number varies slightly from time to time to reflect population change). This is a large legislature by international standards. For instance, the House of Representatives in the USA has 435 seats.

The UK population is 60 million
The U.S.A. population is 301 million
US = 535 when you count Senators which are actually useful somewhat down there.
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2008, 01:29 AM   #14
redforever
Franchise Player
 
redforever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rerun View Post
If we are being fair about all this proportionality, shouldn't PEI be reduced to 1 seat from their current 4?
As it presently sits in the constitution, a province can never have fewer ridings or seats in Parliament than they have seats in the Senate.
redforever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2008, 07:52 AM   #15
guzzy
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

I did hear that Alberta and BC are both getting more seats as well.
guzzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2008, 08:07 AM   #16
HotHotHeat
Franchise Player
 
HotHotHeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Victoria, BC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by redforever View Post
As it presently sits in the constitution, a province can never have fewer ridings or seats in Parliament than they have seats in the Senate.
That is the most obscure fact I've ever read. Mad props to you.
HotHotHeat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2008, 08:42 AM   #17
Bobblehead
Franchise Player
 
Bobblehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HotHotHeat View Post
That is the most obscure fact I've ever read. Mad props to you.
Don't forget to throw those props as Resolute 14, as well (post 5).
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
Bobblehead is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bobblehead For This Useful Post:
Old 12-18-2008, 06:00 PM   #18
snowdude
First Line Centre
 
snowdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: In Ottawa, From Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by guzzy View Post
I did hear that Alberta and BC are both getting more seats as well.
6 each. I read in a blog on Maclean's website (i'll post link when i find it) that this brings the standard to ~100, 000 people per seat in most of the country (if you ignore PEI and their special deal).
__________________
UofA Loves The Flames

snowdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2008, 09:48 PM   #19
Maritime Q-Scout
Ben
 
Maritime Q-Scout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: God's Country (aka Cape Breton Island)
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flip View Post
I say we get rid of the maritimes all together.

Sorry HD and Qscout.
yes yes, let's get rid of the provinces that built the country, woo!

although I will give a shout out for being one of two of the numerous Maritime posters on this board, haha

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14 View Post
Unfortunately, Harper can't legislate that. It would require a constitutional ammendment, as the constitution says that PEI is to have four senators, and no province can have fewer MPs than Senators.
That's the rules. Dunno if I agree with PEI getting FOUR myself, but there must be some logic behind it I'm unaware of?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ok, ok,....I get it View Post
I say we get a federal version of the kids card table at family dinners. put PEI, NB, NS and NFLD at that table. They can only speak when spoken to.
In all fairness, would you sit your grandparents at the kids table? The people who provided for your future, and when you are prosperous and doing well, and they are on hard times, you stick them at the kids table and tell them only speak when spoken to?

Reminds me of the Ricky Bobby scene with Walker & Texas Ranger talking trash to Chip. Sad really.

I've argued on this forum that Nova Scotia got hit with a perfect storm of fracked in the arse. Coal, fisheries, and steel were all pumping, and collapsed at roughly the same time. It was much more diversed than oil and . . . ummmm . . . oil spinoffs?

Back on topic, MP's are elected by population. 1 Member of Parliament per approximately 100,000 I do believe. Should be looked at prior to every election IMO.
__________________

"Calgary Flames is the best team in all the land" - My Brainwashed Son
Maritime Q-Scout is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:45 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy