Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum > Tech Talk
Reload this Page Wireless Network Security
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-22-2008, 10:58 AM   #1
Clarkey
Lifetime Suspension
 
Clarkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default Wireless Network Security
I've got a modem and a wireless router (2.4GHz 802.11b). To get onto the wireless a password is needed. Is this enough security?
Clarkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2008, 11:49 AM   #2
Bobblehead
Franchise Player
 
Bobblehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
Exp:
Default
What type of encryption?

WEP has been shown to be pretty weak, WPA is MUCH better
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
Bobblehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2008, 01:20 PM   #3
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default
I'm going to leave mine wide open, but I'll put in a transparent proxy so if it's not one of my computers on it all the images will be replaced with nasty pr0n.

Or I might be nice and just turn them all upside down.

Plus an open connection gives me plausible deniability.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2008, 09:44 AM   #4
Clarkey
Lifetime Suspension
 
Clarkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default
How do I determine whether it's WEP or WPA?
Clarkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2008, 09:59 AM   #5
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default
When you setup the wireless on the router there should be a way to set what kind of encryption is being used.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2008, 03:24 PM   #6
prarieboy
Late Bloomer
 
prarieboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Campo De Golf
Exp:
Default
I leave mine open but only allow the MAC adresses of computers in my house to use the network.
Is that sufficient??
prarieboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2008, 03:35 PM   #7
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by prarieboy View Post
I leave mine open but only allow the MAC adresses of computers in my house to use the network.
Is that sufficient??
Depends. For anyone who knows, sniffing the traffic and then spoofing the MAC is quite simple.

If you want to prevent the luddite from accessing your network, good enough, but as mentioned WPA is the way to go.

Also, if you hear any reports about it being broke, they are a lie. Its only been made 100X easier - and when you think of it that isnt a lot with the numbers we are talking about - WEP has been broke.
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mykalberta For This Useful Post:
Old 11-24-2008, 03:36 PM   #8
Bobblehead
Franchise Player
 
Bobblehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
Exp:
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by prarieboy View Post
I leave mine open but only allow the MAC adresses of computers in my house to use the network.
Is that sufficient??
Well, anything > nothing.

But that being said, MAC addresses are very easy to spoof, and common free software can sniff the packets to get that data.

As long as someone else in your neighbourhood has a access point that isn't secured, people will use that one first. If someone is looking to be malicious, then limiting to MAC addresses is like locking your screen door. You hope it will make them try someone else's door, but it won't really slow them down if they want to try to get in.
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
Bobblehead is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bobblehead For This Useful Post:
Old 11-24-2008, 03:52 PM   #9
prarieboy
Late Bloomer
 
prarieboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Campo De Golf
Exp:
Default
Looks like I'll be busy tonight playing with the router!!
prarieboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2008, 07:04 PM   #10
Madman
Franchise Player
 
Madman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by prarieboy View Post
Looks like I'll be busy tonight playing with the router!!
Well, whatever you want to call it.
Madman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:20 PM.
Calgary Flames
2024-25



Contact Us - Calgarypuck Forums - Unofficial Calgary Flames Community - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy