Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-26-2008, 01:31 PM   #1
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default Enmax pilots personal wind plan

http://www.pinchercreekecho.com/News/412297.html
Quote:
“We have a pilot program to bring micro generation to the mass market,” said Rob Falconer, director of distributed generation with Enmax.

“Essentially what we’ve found is a 12-foot diameter (referring to the length of the blades) turbine system that would sit on a 33-foot tower, about the size of a flag pole, with a little unit about the size of a two-drawer filing cabinet which weighs about 300 pounds,” Falconer said.

The Skystream ‘residential power appliance’ will “produce two kilowatts per hour with good winds and we expect that in your locale you would get about, on average, 500 kilowatt hours per month which is about two thirds of the average home consumption in Alberta,” he said.

Skystream does not replace the current system for a consumer, but is designed to be hooked into the home’s existing electrical panel and store any excess energy on the grid.

In fact, under the new micro generation regulations that come into effective Jan. 1, 2009 in Alberta, homeowners can be paid for any excess generation they put into the grid, Falconer said.

Enmax already has selectively placed the Skystream units around the southern part of the province.
Could be a major, major breakthrough. Especially in my area, where there is a ton of wind. Rather than using a windfarm that is unable to 'store' electricity, each household could generate their own electricity. Of course, the cost would have too off-set the price of electricity. The government should get involved, and provide tax breaks, or incentives to the people who buy these generators.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2008, 01:49 PM   #2
Frequitude
Franchise Player
 
Frequitude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 555 Saddledome Rise SE
Exp:
Default

I really don't like seeing the director of distributed generation for Enmax refer to the unit's output as "two kilowatts per hour". The kilowatt is already a per-time unit (amount of energy per unit of time). That's like saying "this car can go 100kph per hour".

Also, the grid isn't exactly a storage device like a battery. But when combined with a credit system whereby you earn them for exporting power, the grid is big enough that you can consider it a storage device. I wonder what Enmax's plan is - a credit system, or actually paying a customer for exporting power.
Frequitude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2008, 01:52 PM   #3
RougeUnderoos
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clinching Party
Exp:
Default

Now unless I read that wrong, which is entirely possible, people are going to be paying the same amount for electricity, it'll just happen to be generated in their yard by a giant windmill.

Is that right?
__________________

RougeUnderoos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2008, 04:20 PM   #4
You Need a Thneed
Voted for Kodos
 
You Need a Thneed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RougeUnderoos View Post
Now unless I read that wrong, which is entirely possible, people are going to be paying the same amount for electricity, it'll just happen to be generated in their yard by a giant windmill.

Is that right?
No, they will pay for the electricity that they use, minus the power they generate.

So, if the system generates half the power that you would use, then you will only pay for half as much power.
You Need a Thneed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2008, 04:22 PM   #5
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need a Thneed View Post
No, they will pay for the electricity that they use, minus the power they generate.

So, if the system generates half the power that you would use, then you will only pay for half as much power.
I read it that way too.

So now, the only 'problem' is the cost of the windmill.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2008, 04:45 PM   #6
RougeUnderoos
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clinching Party
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need a Thneed View Post
No, they will pay for the electricity that they use, minus the power they generate.

So, if the system generates half the power that you would use, then you will only pay for half as much power.
Aah, okay, thanks. That makes sense. The way I read it was that the windmill would generate power, it would go into the house, and they'd pay for what it was generating. Sounded like a hell of a deal for Enmax, but I guess that's not it.
__________________

RougeUnderoos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2008, 05:35 PM   #7
Frequitude
Franchise Player
 
Frequitude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 555 Saddledome Rise SE
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure View Post
I read it that way too.

So now, the only 'problem' is the cost of the windmill.
Exactly. Although I think "problem" is the wrong word. It's like paying an upfront fee to save money in perpetuity going forwards. Consider the time value of money. Is the price of the windmill unit worth it to you considering you will save, say, $20 every month for the next 10+ years?
Frequitude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2008, 05:42 PM   #8
arsenal
Director of the HFBI
 
arsenal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I think what they will do with these, as well as with other distributed generation technologies, is rent the item to the consumer, off-set the rental cost with any energy that enters the main grid. If that happens to be more than the rental, then I believe the consumer will then be able to apply that extra towards their bill.
__________________
"Opinions are like demo tapes, and I don't want to hear yours" -- Stephen Colbert
arsenal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2008, 11:12 PM   #9
STeeLy
Franchise Player
 
STeeLy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frequitude View Post
Also, the grid isn't exactly a storage device like a battery. But when combined with a credit system whereby you earn them for exporting power, the grid is big enough that you can consider it a storage device. I wonder what Enmax's plan is - a credit system, or actually paying a customer for exporting power.
I've heard from a high school teacher who had installed solar panels on his home... and he generates enough electricity that the electric company (I am betting its Enmax since he is in Calgary) actually pays him a check of the energy that he puts into the grid.
STeeLy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2008, 11:25 PM   #10
V
Franchise Player
 
V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frequitude View Post
I really don't like seeing the director of distributed generation for Enmax refer to the unit's output as "two kilowatts per hour". The kilowatt is already a per-time unit (amount of energy per unit of time). That's like saying "this car can go 100kph per hour".
A kilowatt has nothing to do with time. You would be right if he had said "two kilowatt hours per hour."
V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2008, 12:15 AM   #11
BlackArcher101
Such a pretty girl!
 
BlackArcher101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I don't get it... I thought homeowners that produced electricity already were reimbursed for it. I've known people that get paid for years now. What's so new about these regulations on Jan 1?
__________________
BlackArcher101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2008, 10:57 AM   #12
MRCboicgy
Referee
 
MRCboicgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In your enterprise AI
Exp:
Default

In other news, Taco Bell announces they have had a personal wind plan for years.

Am I right?

Anyone?

ah forget it.
MRCboicgy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2008, 11:04 AM   #13
Frequitude
Franchise Player
 
Frequitude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 555 Saddledome Rise SE
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by V View Post
A kilowatt has nothing to do with time. You would be right if he had said "two kilowatt hours per hour."
Yes it does. 1 watt = 1 Joule of energy PER second.

An analogy:
Joule (amount of energy) = kilometer (amount of distance)
Watt (rate of energy) = KPH (rate of speed)


A kilowatt-hour is a measure of energy (absolute number, not a rate). It is the amount of energy produced (consumed) by a 1 kilowatt source (load) over the period of an hour. Going by the analogy, it's like measuring a distance in KPH-hours (which is odd, but valid)...the amount of distance covered by something going 1 km/h over the period of an hour.

That's why you pay for your energy in kilowatt-hours. It's a measure of the total amount of energy consumed in your house, not the rate at which you consume it.

Last edited by Frequitude; 07-27-2008 at 11:08 AM.
Frequitude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2008, 11:07 AM   #14
Frequitude
Franchise Player
 
Frequitude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 555 Saddledome Rise SE
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by STeeLy View Post
I've heard from a high school teacher who had installed solar panels on his home... and he generates enough electricity that the electric company (I am betting its Enmax since he is in Calgary) actually pays him a check of the energy that he puts into the grid.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackArcher101 View Post
I don't get it... I thought homeowners that produced electricity already were reimbursed for it. I've known people that get paid for years now. What's so new about these regulations on Jan 1?
Interesting. I know that Alberta has net billing, but I thought Enmax only credited you for what your produced more than you needed and let you draw against that balance when you're using more than you produced. But if you have any credits left over at the end of the year, you don't get paid for them.

This is different in Japan, where you have two separate accounts and meters. One measures what comes in (they bill you for this), the other measures what is produced (they pay you for this).
Frequitude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2008, 11:47 AM   #15
Hack&Lube
Atomic Nerd
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

in germany, most houses and many farms all have solar panels. Excess energy goes back into the grid and you actually get paid for the surplus
Hack&Lube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2008, 01:02 PM   #16
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need a Thneed View Post
No, they will pay for the electricity that they use, minus the power they generate.

So, if the system generates half the power that you would use, then you will only pay for half as much power.
Ideally, that would be nice.

However, the power companies already know what people are willing to pay so I am sure you'll see prices increase so that people would still be paying the same. It probably wouldn't happen overnight, but it would eventually.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:20 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy