02-07-2008, 10:39 AM
|
#21
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Not sure
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buff
We use Symantec at work, it isn't as bad as Norton, but we're looking into other options because we fear Norton's bloatedness will quickly come Symantec's way.
|
I'm actually about to propose to the powers that be at my company to move to Avast Pro. Heard from other IT related people that it has worked out very well.
|
|
|
02-07-2008, 10:42 AM
|
#22
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vancouver
|
format c: /s
|
|
|
02-07-2008, 10:47 AM
|
#23
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: /dev/null
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by worth
format c: /s
|
rm -Rf /
|
|
|
02-07-2008, 12:13 PM
|
#24
|
The new goggles also do nothing.
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
|
The new NOD32 is very nice as well, I like it, though it is a pay one. Their new version is quite lite on resource usage.
Antivir is another good free one, I like it better than AVG or Avast.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
|
|
|
02-07-2008, 02:46 PM
|
#25
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: I don't belong here
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoinAllTheWay
I'm actually about to propose to the powers that be at my company to move to Avast Pro. Heard from other IT related people that it has worked out very well.
|
We were looking at AVG, but I chimed in with my past experience with AVG (the enterprise edition or whatever it is called). Needless to say, my past experience wasn't very ideal. I can't remember the name of our top two choices. I want to say that TrendMicro is one of them, but I'm not sure. My colleague is handling that.
|
|
|
02-07-2008, 02:55 PM
|
#26
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vancouver
|
I use AVG Internet Security and I find it to work very well. No problems whatsoever.
|
|
|
02-07-2008, 04:37 PM
|
#27
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sector 7-G
|
I'm using TrendMicro right now. No major complaints yet - but I will say Trend Firewall causes a lot of conflicts.
|
|
|
02-08-2008, 10:48 AM
|
#28
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Not sure
|
Here is a side by side comparison of the more common scanners. Glad to see Avast doing well. Please keep in mind this list is in Alphabetical order, see right side for actual score.
http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/Results-2008q1.htm
|
|
|
02-08-2008, 10:55 AM
|
#29
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: /dev/null
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I-Hate-Hulse
I'm using TrendMicro right now. No major complaints yet - but I will say Trend Firewall causes a lot of conflicts.
|
I'd recommend ditching the software firewall and using a hardware solution. Most software ones are just over kill if you're behind a hardware firewall, and since most routers come with them installed, software solutions are redundant.
Unless you connect to a lot of unsecured wireless access points that is.
|
|
|
02-08-2008, 11:10 AM
|
#30
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoinAllTheWay
|
That's interesting. How do you put out a product that only catches 55% of viruses?
|
|
|
02-08-2008, 11:27 AM
|
#31
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
|
I find it interesting that if your software takes 4 hours to respond to "widespread malware" (how do they define that?) it is only average.
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
|
|
|
02-08-2008, 02:42 PM
|
#32
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
|
I used AVG and had poor luck with it but that may have had something to do with me using the Millinium OS. I've used Shaw Secure for a few years and it's worked well for me and I like the fact it's free from Shaw. It's actually F-Secure which does well in the ratings I've seen. On the downside, I think it's more of a resource pig than Norton but I've got a good fast computer.
|
|
|
02-08-2008, 04:46 PM
|
#33
|
Atomic Nerd
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary
|
I have not used antivirus's on my main computer for years. They are bloatware and and the resident ones scan everything as you work on each file and the overhead is ridiculous in addition to annoying live updates.
The fine line between viruses and spyware is almost gone, it's all malware and many spyware scanners will do fine for a sweep every now and then. Just make sure you immunize your system with Spybot, have teatimer to monitor registry changes, and then get fixes for any possible exploits and you should be clear to go. I've never had a virus in about 5 years. So glad I ditched Norton, Mcaffee, AVG, Kapersky, Bitdefender, etc.
If a major issue comes up, I run combofix.exe
|
|
|
02-11-2008, 08:12 PM
|
#34
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clinching Party
|
Okay so apparently I never really got rid of this thing because after a few days of adequate though slightly quirky (that I tried to ignore) performance, everything is indeed effed.
It's Windows XP and right now I'm logged in on a "guest account" and it seems to work decent enough, but I'd rather use my own actual user profile, since it's mine, and all my stuff is there. But it won't let me. It won't do anything. Outlook and Firefox simpy won't respond.
I've done the Trend scan, virus scans (still Norton -- installing anything new could, I fear, shut me out completely), Spybot scans, AdAware scans. They've all found bad stuff and apparently gotten rid of it, but still it is screwed up.
If I run those scans while logged in as "guest" will they pick stuff up across the whole machine, or does it just look at what "guest" has?
This is quite frustrating. Does anyone get anything out of messing up my computer?
|
|
|
02-11-2008, 08:23 PM
|
#35
|
The new goggles also do nothing.
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Guest has restricted access, so that's probably why things are better there, the bag programs can't do what they want
This just illustrates that even the best tools don't always get everything.
At this point I think you're quickly approaching rebuild territory, or at least using something like hijack this and going through the system with a fine toothed comb to get rid of anything unwanted.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
|
|
|
02-11-2008, 11:53 PM
|
#36
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
|
I'd try using system restore before doing a new installation.
|
|
|
02-11-2008, 11:58 PM
|
#37
|
CP's Resident DJ
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: In the Gin Bin
|
HijackThis is a good tool IF USED RESPONSIBLY!!!
You can find it here http://www.spywareinfo.com/~merijn/programs.php
Download it, do a scan and post the results here. Do NOT make any changes via this program yet. It impacts your registry, and can seriously screw you up....
But by doing this, we can probably find your problem and it could be a good case study for all CPers.
Last edited by Shawnski; 02-12-2008 at 12:01 AM.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:07 PM.
|
|