Quote:
	
	
		
			
				
					Originally Posted by  browna
					 
				 
				Doesn't there have to be multiple murders of the same modus operendi to even be considered close to  the definition a serial killer? 
			
		 | 
	
	
 
Yeah, that article "3 Calgary women murdered within 5 months" is a pretty big leap from random murders to serial killer.  To me, a parapragh like "These murders are different, in that the deaths involved cruelty. The phrase 'serial killer' is repeated in coffee shops, and on C-Trains, and around the proverbial office water-cooler," is very irresponsible journalism. 
You have one body dismembered and dumped in the river, one killed in a high risk area (and in an intersection where her screams were heard) and one in a more secluded area.  Doesn't really sound like the same dude to me.  And "the deaths involved cruelty" is hardly a solid link between the three.