Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-23-2007, 12:13 PM   #1
alltherage
Missed the bus
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default I hate the word Irregardless more than alot.

First off, anyone who has the quick reply trigger finger, my thread title is a play on words. Anyway:

At least alot somewhat means something, in that it is simply a grammatical or syntactical error (i'm not sure which). I see irregardless so much on this site it makes my brain hurt. You know who you are if you use it.

Wikipedia weighs in that:
"Since the prefix ir- means 'not' (as it does with irrespective), and the suffix -less means 'without,' irregardless is a double negative." (Cf. inflammable, flammable.)

In the words of Steve from American Dad:
"Irregardless? That's not even a real word. You're affixing the negative prefix 'ir-' to 'regardless', but, as 'regardless' is already negative, it's a logical absurdity!"

Stop using it people, regardless of what you may think, irregardless is a word that means nothing. It is absolute sub-english fluff, and needs to be stopped at all costs.

Last edited by alltherage; 10-23-2007 at 12:26 PM.
alltherage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2007, 12:18 PM   #2
Burninator
Franchise Player
 
Burninator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Exp:
Default

I couldn't care less if people use either of those words.
Burninator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2007, 12:22 PM   #3
alltherage
Missed the bus
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Burninator View Post
I couldn't care less if people use either of those words.
^ Yes! People who say "I could care less" are so bloody ignorant! If you could care less, then obviously you must care some!!
alltherage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2007, 12:23 PM   #4
llama64
First Line Centre
 
llama64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: /dev/null
Exp:
Default

Will do, the moment people stop using the word "utilize".
llama64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2007, 12:25 PM   #5
FireFly
Franchise Player
 
FireFly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

This is rediculous!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grimbl420 View Post
I can wash my penis without taking my pants off.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moneyhands23 View Post
If edmonton wins the cup in the next decade I will buy everyone on CP a bottle of vodka.
FireFly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2007, 12:25 PM   #6
alltherage
Missed the bus
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by llama64 View Post
Will do, the moment people stop using the word "utilize".
What? Explain? Utilize is a perfectly good word. It means "To make use of".
alltherage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2007, 12:26 PM   #7
arloiginla
#1 Goaltender
 
arloiginla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Basically, it is a problem. And ultimately, I hope it gets fixed.
arloiginla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2007, 12:32 PM   #8
MolsonInBothHands
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Exp:
Default

Of coarse, there is the improper use of then and than. Every now and than you see it, and it is more annoying then wholes in your socks.
MolsonInBothHands is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2007, 12:32 PM   #9
rubecube
Franchise Player
 
rubecube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
Exp:
Default

Ludacris!
rubecube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2007, 12:33 PM   #10
alltherage
Missed the bus
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
So does "use". Slapping in two extra syllables makes you smarter though.
Good for "use", but that doesn't make "utilize" incorrect, it just means you have a preference for which word you would like to utilize.
alltherage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2007, 12:34 PM   #11
4X4
One of the Nine
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

You noticed that in Lanny's Tanguay post too, eh?
4X4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2007, 12:35 PM   #12
llama64
First Line Centre
 
llama64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: /dev/null
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alltherage View Post
What? Explain? Utilize is a perfectly good word. It means "To make use of".
"Our application utilizes the latest technology..."

"Our application uses the latest technology..."

Explain the difference please.

The only valid argument is that "utilize" somehow relates to the employment of things more then "use". Which then I would ask, why not just use the word "employ".

"Utilize" is a redundant word used by people to sound smarter then they actually are.

/rant
llama64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2007, 12:36 PM   #13
4X4
One of the Nine
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

As long as there's a grammar nazi thread, I might as well contribute:

They're going there with their mother.
4X4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2007, 12:37 PM   #14
alltherage
Missed the bus
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by llama64 View Post
"Our application utilizes the latest technology..."

"Our application uses the latest technology..."

Explain the difference please.

The only valid argument is that "utilize" somehow relates to the employment of things more then "use". Which then I would ask, why not just use the word "employ".

"Utilize" is a redundant word used by people to sound smarter then they actually are.

/rant
As I stated above:

Quote:
Good for "use", but that doesn't make "utilize" incorrect, it just means you have a preference for which word you would like to utilize.
Redundant does not mean incorrect.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4X4 View Post
You noticed that in Lanny's Tanguay post too, eh?
Yes I did.
alltherage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2007, 12:38 PM   #15
llama64
First Line Centre
 
llama64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: /dev/null
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MolsonInBothHands View Post
Of coarse, there is the improper use of then and than. Every now and than you see it, and it is more annoying then wholes in your socks.
I hate then/than. I've never figured it out!
llama64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2007, 12:40 PM   #16
pope04
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

This thread is a real suprise!
pope04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2007, 12:40 PM   #17
llama64
First Line Centre
 
llama64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: /dev/null
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alltherage View Post
Redundant does not mean incorrect.
While I'm not arguing with you I'd like to clarify that if you use "utilize", to many people you come off as a doofus.

The words you choose to employ matter.
llama64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2007, 12:40 PM   #18
alltherage
Missed the bus
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by llama64 View Post
I hate then/than. I've never figured it out!
Then is a time reference. "I ate my burger right then and there."

Than is a comparison reference. "My dad is stronger than your dad."
alltherage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2007, 12:44 PM   #19
CubicleGeek
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Exp:
Default

If it is any consolation, it really isn't even a real word. From dictionary.com:

Usage Note: Irregardless is a word that many mistakenly believe to be correct usage in formal style, when in fact it is used chiefly in nonstandard speech or casual writing. Coined in the United States in the early 20th century, it has met with a blizzard of condemnation for being an improper yoking of irrespective and regardless and for the logical absurdity of combining the negative ir- prefix and -less suffix in a single term. Although one might reasonably argue that it is no different from words with redundant affixes like debone and unravel, it has been considered a blunder for decades and will probably continue to be so.

In other words, it falls in the same class as "phat" or "fo shizzle".

Edit: But irregardless of what you think about these words, people are still going to use them.

Last edited by CubicleGeek; 10-23-2007 at 12:46 PM.
CubicleGeek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2007, 12:45 PM   #20
The Yen Man
Franchise Player
 
The Yen Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Maybe I'm alone, but I've always been annoyed with the improper use of "your". I find it kind of ironic when someone posts "your a moron!"

Me fail English? That's unpossible!
The Yen Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:32 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy