09-29-2007, 11:54 AM
|
#1
|
|
Had an idea!
|
Dire warning from nuclear energy critic
http://www.edmontonsun.com/News/Albe...35752-sun.html
Quote:
Nuclear power may be green but it's nowhere near clean, a prominent nuclear critic with the Sierra Club of Canada said yesterday.
"Make no mistake. Once you opt for nuclear power in Alberta, you are consenting to making this province a radioactive waste dump," said Dr. Gordon Edwards, president of the Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility.
His visit to Edmonton was part of a whirlwind tour of Alberta during which he also addressed communities in the Peace Country and Whitecourt - proposed construction sites for controversial nuclear reactors.
Liberal and NDP officials have already expressed their discomfort over bringing nuclear energy to Alberta, and Edwards supported their views.
"Nuclear power is like a lobster trap - it's easy to get in, but impossible to get out," Edwards said.
|
Sweet.
Just what we needed. 
|
|
|
|
09-29-2007, 11:58 AM
|
#2
|
|
My face is a bum!
|
Does anyone know how much waste would actually be produced by the proposed reactors?
|
|
|
|
|
09-29-2007, 03:03 PM
|
#3
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hulkrogan
Does anyone know how much waste would actually be produced by the proposed reactors?
|
Well, I did find this
Quote:
|
To put this in perspective, if we were to take all the nuclear waste produced to date in the United States and stack it side-by-side, end-to-end, it would cover an area about the size of a football field to a depth of about ten feet.
|
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
|
|
|
|
|
09-29-2007, 03:04 PM
|
#4
|
|
Had an idea!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobblehead
|
Heh.
And we can't contain that much waste?
You're kidding me.
|
|
|
|
|
09-29-2007, 03:13 PM
|
#5
|
|
CP's Fraser Crane
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
Heh.
And we can't contain that much waste?
You're kidding me.
|
What do you do with nucular waste? Does it ever go to normal? OR do you have to store it forever?
|
|
|
|
|
09-29-2007, 03:18 PM
|
#6
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Market Mall Food Court
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stang
What do you do with nucular waste? Does it ever go to normal? OR do you have to store it forever?
|
Just pack it onto the space shuttle and shoot the crap into outer space. Just hope the shuttle doesn't explode in the atmosphere.
Course it never a good idea having nukes roam around space. See Superman 4. hehe
|
|
|
|
|
09-29-2007, 03:19 PM
|
#7
|
|
Had an idea!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stang
What do you do with nucular waste? Does it ever go to normal? OR do you have to store it forever?
|
Wikipedia has all the answers...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_waste
|
|
|
|
|
09-29-2007, 03:21 PM
|
#8
|
|
Had an idea!
|
Wouldn't it take 15 years before a plant could be up and running if construction started today?
Don't you think we could have better waste solutions by then?
This short-sighted attitude toward nuclear power, which is IMO the future....is ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
|
09-29-2007, 05:10 PM
|
#9
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Elbows Up!!
|
I'm not sure that we need this plant. I'm not sure that we don't need this plant either.
but isn't over caution the best policy with nuclear stuff?
__________________
Franchise > Team > Player
Future historians will celebrate June 24, 2024 as the date when the timeline corrected itself.
|
|
|
|
|
09-29-2007, 06:14 PM
|
#10
|
|
My face is a bum!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by McG
I'm not sure that we need this plant. I'm not sure that we don't need this plant either.
but isn't over caution the best policy with nuclear stuff?
|
It seems to me it would be easier to figure out what to do with a bunch of junk in the ground down the road because you know where you left it as compared to dealing with a bunch of junk in the air that's disperesed across the planet down the road.
I really can't imagine many worse forms of power generation than coal.
|
|
|
|
|
09-29-2007, 06:22 PM
|
#11
|
|
Ben
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: God's Country (aka Cape Breton Island)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hulkrogan
I really can't imagine many worse forms of power generation than coal.
|
"What?! Working with coal has no negative side effect at all" says the guy living next to North America's largest toxic waste dump created by coal by-product, and an abnormally high cancer rate while being surrounded by coal power generators. "Nope, no negative side effect at all" 
__________________
"Calgary Flames is the best team in all the land" - My Brainwashed Son
|
|
|
|
|
09-29-2007, 07:02 PM
|
#12
|
|
The new goggles also do nothing.
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Some Guy
"Make no mistake. Once you opt for nuclear power in Alberta, you are consenting to making this province a radioactive waste dump," said Dr. Gordon Edwards, president of the Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility.
|
Because every place that have had nuclear power for decades is a radioactive waste dump now.
What is this guy's alternative?
And I like how he says France is phasing out their nuclear program; they get 80% of their electricity from nuclear power... Even Sweden gets 20%, they want to be nuclear free but I'd be suprised if it happened before I got false teeth.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
|
|
|
|
|
09-29-2007, 08:39 PM
|
#13
|
|
My face is a bum!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by photon
Because every place that have had nuclear power for decades is a radioactive waste dump now.
What is this guy's alternative?
And I like how he says France is phasing out their nuclear program; they get 80% of their electricity from nuclear power... Even Sweden gets 20%, they want to be nuclear free but I'd be suprised if it happened before I got false teeth.
|
Didn't France just build a bunch of reactors in recent history to power their train systems? Even in Switzerland I spotted a cooling tower or two from the electric trains. Nuclear powered trains rule, way better than our rolling Diesel AC generators.
|
|
|
|
|
09-29-2007, 08:48 PM
|
#14
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
Quote:
Nuclear power may be green but it's nowhere near clean, a prominent nuclear critic with the Sierra Club of Canada said yesterday.
"Make no mistake. Once you opt for nuclear power in Alberta, you are consenting to making this province a radioactive waste dump," said Dr. Gordon Edwards, president of the Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility.
His visit to Edmonton was part of a whirlwind tour of Alberta during which he also addressed communities in the Peace Country and Whitecourt - proposed construction sites for controversial nuclear reactors.
Liberal and NDP officials have already expressed their discomfort over bringing nuclear energy to Alberta, and Edwards supported their views.
"Nuclear power is like a lobster trap - it's easy to get in, but impossible to get out," Edwards said.
|
Well Edmonton's not far off from being a radioactive waste dump as it is already so I dont see it as much of a loss.... 
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans
If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:05 PM.
|
|
