02-04-2012, 08:11 PM
|
#141
|
|
Scoring Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Notorious Honey Badger
I don't recall the city of Winnipeg going up in flames after losing their team to the Red Wings. Or Portage and Main being torn apart after the loss to the Lions.
Vancouver sports fans are a special breed of contemptible losers.
|
Pretty broad brush you're using there.
|
|
|
|
02-12-2012, 12:58 PM
|
#142
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Easter back on in Vancouver
|
I will coincidentally bump this thread now that Calgary has passed Winnipeg.
1. Vancouver
2. Ottawa
3. Toronto
4. Calgary
5. Winnipeg
6. Montreal
7. Oil Kings
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to puckluck For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
02-12-2012, 01:29 PM
|
#143
|
|
Norm!
|
I really think that Ottawa and Toronto are going to slide right out of the race before the trade deadline.
Toronto's goaltending is starting to slide, and Ottawa looks like they're games taking a hit.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
|
|
02-12-2012, 01:32 PM
|
#144
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Easter back on in Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
I really think that Ottawa and Toronto are going to slide right out of the race before the trade deadline.
Toronto's goaltending is starting to slide, and Ottawa looks like they're games taking a hit.
|
Yeah, but who is going to take their place? The only teams really fighting for 2 spots right now are Ottawa, Toronto, and Washington.
So I think either one of Toronto or ottawa are guaranteed a spot with Washington taking the other.
|
|
|
|
|
02-12-2012, 01:41 PM
|
#145
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by puckluck
Yeah, but who is going to take their place? The only teams really fighting for 2 spots right now are Ottawa, Toronto, and Washington.
So I think either one of Toronto or ottawa are guaranteed a spot with Washington taking the other.
|
I wouldn't count out Tampa Bay. They are 7-1-2 in the last 10, and while they are 8 points out of 8th, they have 2 games in hand on Toronto and 4 on Ottawa.
I would hate to be the team in first who is forced to play a streaking Lightning team. That and like Captain, both Toronto and Ottawa missing the playoffs would make my day. If I had to choose between the two obviously Toronto finishing outside the top 8 is the preferable option.
|
|
|
|
|
02-12-2012, 02:08 PM
|
#146
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Looks like it's "do or die" time for the Jets. They play nine of their next ten games at home. It's time to capitalize. They need to Win at least 7 of those games to make the playoffs.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Jets4Life For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
02-12-2012, 06:05 PM
|
#147
|
|
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by puckluck
I will coincidentally bump this thread now that Calgary has passed Winnipeg.
1. Vancouver
2. Ottawa
3. Toronto
4. Calgary
5. Winnipeg
6. Montreal
7. Oil Kings
|
Shouldn't CGY be #1 after beating VAN twice in a row?
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to troutman For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
02-12-2012, 11:36 PM
|
#148
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman
Shouldn't CGY be #1 after beating VAN twice in a row?
|
They're point rankings, not power rankings.
If it was up to me, the rankings would be, alphabetically:
1. Calgary
2. Edmonton
3. Montreal
4. Ottawa
5. Toronto
6. Vancouver
7. Winnipeg
|
|
|
|
|
02-13-2012, 12:09 AM
|
#149
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Bay Area
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sidney Crosby's Hat
They're point rankings, not power rankings.
If it was up to me, the rankings would be, alphabetically:
1. Calgary
2. Edmonton
3. Montreal
4. Ottawa
5. Toronto
6. Vancouver
7. Winnipeg
|
That would end up ranking Vancouver too high, in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
02-13-2012, 12:14 AM
|
#150
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sidney Crosby's Hat
They're point rankings, not power rankings.
If it was up to me, the rankings would be, alphabetically:
1. Calgary
2. Edmonton
3. Montreal
4. Ottawa
5. Toronto
6. Vancouver
7. Winnipeg
|
Ranking based on # of Iginlas imo
|
|
|
|
|
02-13-2012, 12:14 AM
|
#151
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
1. Vancouver
2. Toronto
3. Montreal
4. Ottawa
5. Calgary
6. Winnipeg
7. Edmonton
__________________
_________
"I quit therapy because my analyst was trying to help me behind my back."
—Richard Lewis
|
|
|
|
|
02-13-2012, 12:28 AM
|
#152
|
|
Norm!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by VERVE
1. Vancouver
2. Toronto
3. Montreal
4. Ottawa
5. Calgary
6. Winnipeg
7. Edmonton
|
Why do you have a terrible team like Montreal ranked ahead of Ottawa and Calgary?
The only team that Montreal is better then is Edmonton.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
|
|
02-13-2012, 12:48 AM
|
#153
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
Why do you have a terrible team like Montreal ranked ahead of Ottawa and Calgary?
The only team that Montreal is better then is Edmonton.
|
It was a toss up amongst Montreal, Ottawa and Calgary. It could have went Ottawa, Calgary and then Montreal. At the end I went with goal differential. Giving more credence to the old fashion stats of scoring more goals than letting them in would win more games...
__________________
_________
"I quit therapy because my analyst was trying to help me behind my back."
—Richard Lewis
|
|
|
|
|
02-13-2012, 01:24 AM
|
#154
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: PEI
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by VERVE
It was a toss up amongst Montreal, Ottawa and Calgary. It could have went Ottawa, Calgary and then Montreal. At the end I went with goal differential. Giving more credence to the old fashion stats of scoring more goals than letting them in would win more games...
|
I tend to go by who actually wins the games, not who could've potentially won more games that they lost.
Montreal ranked ahead of Calgary or Ottawa shows ignorance IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
02-13-2012, 01:40 AM
|
#155
|
|
Celebrated Square Root Day
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by VERVE
It was a toss up amongst Montreal, Ottawa and Calgary. It could have went Ottawa, Calgary and then Montreal. At the end I went with goal differential. Giving more credence to the old fashion stats of scoring more goals than letting them in would win more games...
|
Huh? So you went with goal differential and left out ACTUAL points the teams have earned this season? 
|
|
|
|
|
02-13-2012, 09:23 AM
|
#156
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Bay Area
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flameswin
Huh? So you went with goal differential and left out ACTUAL points the teams have earned this season? |
Verve's just old-fashioned that way I guess.
|
|
|
|
|
02-13-2012, 09:32 AM
|
#157
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hells Bells
I tend to go by who actually wins the games, not who could've potentially won more games that they lost.
Montreal ranked ahead of Calgary or Ottawa shows ignorance IMO.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flameswin
Huh? So you went with goal differential and left out ACTUAL points the teams have earned this season? |
Like I had stated earlier, it was a toss up. They are so close in points with Ottawa ahead of the Flames and Montreal behind Calgary by only 5 points. In the end, I went with stats and that is the goal differential. It was in no way a put down of the Flames because of BOA rivalry.
__________________
_________
"I quit therapy because my analyst was trying to help me behind my back."
—Richard Lewis
|
|
|
|
|
02-13-2012, 09:42 AM
|
#158
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
|
so the fact that the bruins killed us in that game is making a world of difference in your eyes?
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
|
|
|
|
02-13-2012, 09:52 AM
|
#159
|
|
Norm!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by VERVE
It was a toss up amongst Montreal, Ottawa and Calgary. It could have went Ottawa, Calgary and then Montreal. At the end I went with goal differential. Giving more credence to the old fashion stats of scoring more goals than letting them in would win more games...
|
Yeah I remember when the Hartford Whalers wone the Cup after qualifying for the playoffs in the 70's. They didn't have the points, but man their goal differential was . . .
sorry I can't do it, that's the stupidest thing I've ever read.
Calgary is 5 points up on the Habs therefore Calgary better then the Habs the stats don't make up the difference, they would if they were tied or close with games in hand on either side, but they're not. Every team in Canada in pretty much better then the Habs with the exception of the Oilers.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
|
|
02-13-2012, 10:01 AM
|
#160
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by VERVE
It was in no way a put down of the Flames because of BOA rivalry.
|
So then it was because you know nothing about hockey?
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:36 AM.
|
|
