10-03-2025, 03:29 PM
|
#9621
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Royle9
Robertson is the name that has me wondering.
Flames lack/want a point producing player (yea he’s not a center)
Stars aren’t close with an extension and rumoured to be shopping him.
Nothing close that I’ve heard but it makes you wonder if there’s a swap including him with Anderson and other pieces
|
What is he without a legit #1C? Do we know? I don't watch him except when he is playing the Flames.
Unsigned Robby for unsigned Ras headline the deal, can we take some salaries and get some kids too? Or retain some $$$ on Coleman and send him for picks/youngsters. Let's make this a blockbuster!
Coleman creates a hole. To fill it, shift Flames wingers down a line after inserting Robby at the top. Not bad.
It makes too much sense. Probably won't happen.
|
|
|
10-03-2025, 04:20 PM
|
#9622
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ontario
|
The Sens have traded Zack MacEwen to the Devils for face-puncher Kurtis MacDermid.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Ped For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-03-2025, 04:22 PM
|
#9623
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Badgers Nose
What is he without a legit #1C? Do we know? I don't watch him except when he is playing the Flames.
|
Yea I don’t know.
He can generate his own offence, that’s for sure.
But he does benefit from playing a more skilled system, puck possession being key.
With our luck… I don’t even want to think about it!
Last edited by Royle9; 10-03-2025 at 06:14 PM.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Royle9 For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-03-2025, 04:44 PM
|
#9624
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Would rather not get a winger that’s going take opportunity away from players like Coronato, Zary and Gridin.
|
|
|
10-03-2025, 04:53 PM
|
#9625
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stemit14
Would rather not get a winger that’s going take opportunity away from players like Coronato, Zary and Gridin.
|
You talking about Robertson?!
Yeah who wants a 26 year old that is over PPG for his career and has had a 109 point season. This place is wild sometimes...none of those guys are even close to his skill and two of them aren't even much younger. And I love all three players.
__________________
GFG
Last edited by dino7c; 10-03-2025 at 04:55 PM.
|
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-03-2025, 05:30 PM
|
#9626
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Badgers Nose
What is he without a legit #1C? Do we know? I don't watch him except when he is playing the Flames.
Unsigned Robby for unsigned Ras headline the deal, can we take some salaries and get some kids too? Or retain some $$$ on Coleman and send him for picks/youngsters. Let's make this a blockbuster!
Coleman creates a hole. To fill it, shift Flames wingers down a line after inserting Robby at the top. Not bad.
It makes too much sense. Probably won't happen.
|
It would be a very interesting move... but I would hope that they flip him right away to one of the C heavy teams (Sharks, Ducks, Blackhawks, etc). It could turn into quite the blockbuster then...
Trade 1: Robertson + Lyubushkin (2 year cap dump) <-> Andersson (retained) + Coleman (retained) + ??
Then move out Robertson for a young C.
I know in the summer when we suggested an Andersson++ trade to the Red Wings for Danielson the answer was "No, Yzerman loves Danielson too much". But to get a 40 goal scorer?
Or how about the Blackhawks? They have Bedard, Nazar, Moore, and Frondell. Would a C be available for Robertson as a top line winger?
How much would CP lower the value of Robertson once he was a Flame instead of a Star?
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Wolven For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-03-2025, 06:16 PM
|
#9627
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolven
It would be a very interesting move... but I would hope that they flip him right away to one of the C heavy teams (Sharks, Ducks, Blackhawks, etc). It could turn into quite the blockbuster then...
Trade 1: Robertson + Lyubushkin (2 year cap dump) <-> Andersson (retained) + Coleman (retained) + ??
Then move out Robertson for a young C.
I know in the summer when we suggested an Andersson++ trade to the Red Wings for Danielson the answer was "No, Yzerman loves Danielson too much". But to get a 40 goal scorer?
Or how about the Blackhawks? They have Bedard, Nazar, Moore, and Frondell. Would a C be available for Robertson as a top line winger?
How much would CP lower the value of Robertson once he was a Flame instead of a Star?
|
This post has aroused me, you devil!
CC, are you reading this? Only one way to find out if this is doable.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Badgers Nose For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-03-2025, 07:00 PM
|
#9628
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Badgers Nose
What is he without a legit #1C? Do we know? I don't watch him except when he is playing the Flames.
Unsigned Robby for unsigned Ras headline the deal, can we take some salaries and get some kids too? Or retain some $$$ on Coleman and send him for picks/youngsters. Let's make this a blockbuster!
Coleman creates a hole. To fill it, shift Flames wingers down a line after inserting Robby at the top. Not bad.
It makes too much sense. Probably won't happen.
|
Is Hintz a legit #1C? Because Robertson did great playing with him. Hintz is definitely better than Kadri, but he's closer to Kadri than any of the top 10 C's in the NHL.
|
|
|
10-03-2025, 07:11 PM
|
#9629
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ontario
|
Kadri actually finished ahead of Hintz last year in the scoring race - same points but Kadri had more goals, although he played 6 more games.
|
|
|
10-03-2025, 07:18 PM
|
#9630
|
All I can get
|
Wrong thread
__________________
Thank you for your attention to this matter!
|
|
|
10-03-2025, 07:44 PM
|
#9631
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Jun 2025
Exp:  
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Royle9
Robertson is the name that has me wondering.
Flames lack/want a point producing player (yea he’s not a center)
Stars aren’t close with an extension and rumoured to be shopping him.
Nothing close that I’ve heard but it makes you wonder if there’s a swap including him with Anderson and other pieces
|
Old news.
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/...ason-robertson
Last edited by DreDayPucks; 10-03-2025 at 07:47 PM.
|
|
|
10-03-2025, 07:50 PM
|
#9632
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
You talking about Robertson?!
Yeah who wants a 26 year old that is over PPG for his career and has had a 109 point season. This place is wild sometimes...none of those guys are even close to his skill and two of them aren't even much younger. And I love all three players.
|
The last 100+ point winger the Flames traded for didn't turn out as great. Without good C depth, wingers wont do as well. This team needs to build slowly and properly, adding wingers that excel in a system the Flames don't play will go poorly for them.
Robertson would be a great addition to a lot of teams but just doesn't make sense for the Flames. It would be like adding performance tires to a station wagon.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Poe969 For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-03-2025, 10:51 PM
|
#9633
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969
The last 100+ point winger the Flames traded for didn't turn out as great. Without good C depth, wingers wont do as well. This team needs to build slowly and properly, adding wingers that excel in a system the Flames don't play will go poorly for them.
Robertson would be a great addition to a lot of teams but just doesn't make sense for the Flames. It would be like adding performance tires to a station wagon.
|
Hence why flipping him would be the way to go. The Stars need a top 4 RD and middle 6 LW. Andersson and Coleman can play those roles at a discounted rate. Although, if the Stars trade Robertson, Coleman would then be their #1LW. Yikes.
The Stars also need to unload Lyubushkin and the Flames could bury him, if needed, or hold him until another team has injuries and flip him too.
The trade is a good fit for the Stars, but not so much for the Flames.
However, if Robertson changes which teams want to trade a C to the Flames, then that is a win. I think Robertson could be close in value to most of the good C prospects that Conroy would be looking at and, if needed, a pick or prospect could be added to up the offer (but I doubt it would need to be a significant add).
|
|
|
10-03-2025, 11:02 PM
|
#9634
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolven
Hence why flipping him would be the way to go. The Stars need a top 4 RD and middle 6 LW. Andersson and Coleman can play those roles at a discounted rate. Although, if the Stars trade Robertson, Coleman would then be their #1LW. Yikes.
|
At which point they don't have a middle-six LW out of the deal, just a massive downgrade on the first line. Not much point in making a deal like that.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
|
|
|
10-03-2025, 11:08 PM
|
#9635
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random
At which point they don't have a middle-six LW out of the deal, just a massive downgrade on the first line. Not much point in making a deal like that.
|
Ya, I do not think it make sense for them to trade Robertson at all, their LW depth would be gone... but if the rumour is that he is refusing to sign an extension with the Stars then maybe there is an opportunity there.
Bischel is way more realistic, IMO.
|
|
|
10-03-2025, 11:35 PM
|
#9636
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969
The last 100+ point winger the Flames traded for didn't turn out as great. Without good C depth, wingers wont do as well. This team needs to build slowly and properly, adding wingers that excel in a system the Flames don't play will go poorly for them.
Robertson would be a great addition to a lot of teams but just doesn't make sense for the Flames. It would be like adding performance tires to a station wagon.
|
The Flames arent building slowly though Wolf's prime...if a trade like this is possible you do it
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:31 AM.
|
|