06-24-2014, 11:38 AM
|
#61
|
Ass Handler
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Okotoks, AB
|
I'm a big fan of Colborne, he fits in nicely in the top 6, IMO.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to StrykerSteve For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-24-2014, 11:44 AM
|
#62
|
Scoring Winger
|
The only team that Colborne looks like a top 6 player is the one that competes for the top draft pick. I like the guy and he showed improvement as the year went along, wing position looks good on him.
If he puts another 10lbs this summer and further develops who knows. Odds are he could be a good 3rd line player, needs some development for 2nd line. This upcoming year will tell the story what he is going to be in NHL.
|
|
|
06-24-2014, 11:44 AM
|
#63
|
Franchise Player
|
You guys are high. Plays consistently died on Colborne's stick. If he's in the top 6 his team probably isn't going to be very good.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
|
|
|
|
06-24-2014, 11:46 AM
|
#64
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw
You guys are high. Plays consistently died on Colborne's stick. If he's in the top 6 his team probably isn't going to be very good.
|
I'd give him a full year on the RW before we start criticizing his play. Keep in mind, he was still considered a rookie last year.
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to ForeverFlameFan For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-24-2014, 11:46 AM
|
#65
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: City by the Bay
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by theoforever
The only team that Colborne looks like a top 6 player is the one that competes for the top draft pick. I like the guy and he showed improvement as the year went along, wing position looks good on him.
If he puts another 10lbs this summer and further develops who knows. Odds are he could be a good 3rd line player, needs some development for 2nd line. This upcoming year will tell the story what he is going to be in NHL.
|
Ya, the good news is he's only 24. Some on the board will allege that he's peaked, but I think there's still plenty of room considering last year was his first full NHL season.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Clever_Iggy For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-24-2014, 11:48 AM
|
#66
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw
You guys are high. Plays consistently died on Colborne's stick. If he's in the top 6 his team probably isn't going to be very good.
|
It was his rookie season last year and his play did improve as the season progressed. He does have pretty soft hands and just needs to keep improving his overall play. I don't think he's top 3 material but it's a little early to write him off as a bottom 6 player.
|
|
|
06-24-2014, 11:52 AM
|
#67
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Why does Colborne have to be top 6? He is a project and could turn out to be anything at this point. Toronto gave up on him too soon
|
|
|
06-24-2014, 11:53 AM
|
#68
|
Our Jessica Fletcher
|
I'd love to see a 3rd line this season of Baertschi Monahan Colborne
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to The Fonz For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-24-2014, 11:53 AM
|
#69
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
It was his rookie season last year and his play did improve as the season progressed. He does have pretty soft hands and just needs to keep improving his overall play. I don't think he's top 3 material but it's a little early to write him off as a bottom 6 player.
|
Not sure if labelling him as a bottom six player is writing him off. I don't see top 6 in his future but he's developed a good two-way game and has learned to use his size, especially in board play. Saying he has a future as a 3rd line winger, is good praise considering how he started last season.
|
|
|
06-24-2014, 11:56 AM
|
#70
|
#1 Goaltender
|
My draft list for the flames:
1. Bennett
2. Reinhart
3. Draisaitl
4. Ekblad
I'm just not convinced that Ekblad becomes anything more than a 3-4 d-man. Could be wrong, but I see more potential in the other 3, especially with drafting this high.
|
|
|
06-24-2014, 12:00 PM
|
#71
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fonz
I'd love to see a 3rd line this season of Baertschi Monahan Colborne
|
Monahan on the 3rd line? Stajan is more likely to shake out there. Backlund and Monahan are likely to be our 1-2 punch this year.
|
|
|
06-24-2014, 12:03 PM
|
#72
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bax
My draft list for the flames:
1. Bennett
2. Reinhart
3. Draisaitl
4. Ekblad
I'm just not convinced that Ekblad becomes anything more than a 3-4 d-man. Could be wrong, but I see more potential in the other 3, especially with drafting this high.
|
So the #1 ranked player for this draft is only a 2nd pairing guy? That makes no sense. Ekblad has all the tools to be a top pairing shut down D with strong goal scoring.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-24-2014, 12:04 PM
|
#73
|
Our Jessica Fletcher
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher
Monahan on the 3rd line? Stajan is more likely to shake out there. Backlund and Monahan are likely to be our 1-2 punch this year.
|
He'll only be 20 next season. I'd like to see him play 15 mins/game again, and see some sheltered minutes. I'd like Stajan + Backlund on lines 1 + 2 getting the tough minutes.
|
|
|
06-24-2014, 12:06 PM
|
#74
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher
So the #1 ranked player for this draft is only a 2nd pairing guy? That makes no sense. Ekblad has all the tools to be a top pairing shut down D with strong goal scoring.
|
He may be the consensus pick for Florida, but plenty of scouting services has Reinhart or Bennett in front of him. Plenty of scouts have mentioned that he a less of a prospect than Jones was last year.
I'm also weary of the fact that he's essentially been a full grown man since the age of 16. I'm just not sold that his game will translate to the NHL. Don't get me wrong, I think he will be good, but I think he's closer to Eric Johnson than Drew Doughty.
|
|
|
06-24-2014, 12:11 PM
|
#75
|
Scoring Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clever_Iggy
Ya, the good news is he's only 24. Some on the board will allege that he's peaked, but I think there's still plenty of room considering last year was his first full NHL season.
|
Definitely to early to tell and no way he has picked. The 2014/2015 season will give a good insight, to his potential. The 2015/2016 will define what he is for sure, so that would be 26. We could have a real steal here.
|
|
|
06-24-2014, 12:11 PM
|
#76
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Ekblad is ranked #2 at worst by almost every service. So he's overall the highest ranked player for this draft. Bob Mackenzie said 7/10 of the scouts he talked to have him 1st. His game obviously translates, why wouldn't it? Looks like a Rob Blake type to me.
|
|
|
06-24-2014, 12:14 PM
|
#77
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher
Ekblad is ranked #2 at worst by almost every service. So he's overall the highest ranked player for this draft. Bob Mackenzie said 7/10 of the scouts he talked to have him 1st. His game obviously translates, why wouldn't it? Looks like a Rob Blake type to me.
|
I'm not sold on his game translating because he's been physically mature his entire junior career and therefore been able to dominate with his strength. Things are going to be much different at the NHL level.
Once again, not saying that he's not going to be good, just that for the flames needs I would rather have one of the 3 centers
|
|
|
06-24-2014, 12:19 PM
|
#78
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
He's a d-man. Not drafting d-men in the top 5 is quite simply a sound conservative drafting philosophy - they are inherently high risk, high reward. People ranking Ekblad below the other 3 are totally justified in doing so.
|
|
|
06-24-2014, 12:31 PM
|
#79
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bax
I'm not sold on his game translating because he's been physically mature his entire junior career and therefore been able to dominate with his strength. Things are going to be much different at the NHL level.
Once again, not saying that he's not going to be good, just that for the flames needs I would rather have one of the 3 centers
|
I think there would be something to worry about IF Ekblad hadn't scored at nearly a PPG clip over the course of the season. In 58 games he scored 23 goals, 30 assists for 53 points. That is impressive to me, and makes me wonder why certain media outlets are questioning Ekblad's dynamism.
These people go on and on about Ekblad being 'no Seth Jones'. Jones, who is also 6'4" and has similar physical gifts, played 61 games & scored 14 goals and 42 assists for 56 points in his only season in the CHL. Very similar numbers, but on a Portland team that was stacked.
At worst Ekblad looks like he'll be the shutdown presence on a good team's 1st pairing. If his offence doesn't translate (which is ludicrous considering the cannon of a slapshot he possesses) he still has the physical and mental gifts to be a pretty special defenceman.
|
|
|
06-24-2014, 12:41 PM
|
#80
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameZilla
At worst Ekblad looks like he'll be the shutdown presence on a good team's 1st pairing. If his offence doesn't translate (which is ludicrous considering the cannon of a slapshot he possesses) he still has the physical and mental gifts to be a pretty special defenceman.
|
This. Ekblad apparently has among the highest hockey IQs in the entire draft. That's why he's a shut-down guy, not because he goes around crushing boys.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:52 AM.
|
|