Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum

View Poll Results: Thoughts on the trade
Home run win 10 1.34%
Modest win 203 27.18%
Break even (expected) 346 46.32%
Modest loss 141 18.88%
Face plant 47 6.29%
Voters: 747. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-19-2026, 05:31 AM   #1241
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
So it seems Conroy asked Ras camp if there were teams he'd consider extending with so they could work on a sign and trade type of deal with a bigger return for the Flames. They gave him a short list of teams and CC ground away with those teams on acceptable trades, once agreed to they gave those teams permission to talk to Ras camp and those discussions were fruitless, probably because Ras ask is way too high. So ultimately Ras agent said no extension will be agreed to with any team. So CC ground away on those sign and trade deals for nothing and had to settle on the best rental return.

Gotta be frustrating for CC. Especially when some of the bigger return prices were leaked and it makes this return look worse in comparison to some people.

And why exactly should Ras maximize the return for the team dumping him?

(And weaken the team that wants him)

He has a big life decision to make. Why rush it?
DeluxeMoustache is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DeluxeMoustache For This Useful Post:
Old 01-19-2026, 06:04 AM   #1242
bigrangy
Franchise Player
 
bigrangy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Exp:
Default

My initial impression is I hate half measures. Valuing Whitecloud is just more of the same Miromanov, Kuzmenko, etc level pissing around that keeps the team mid and keeps the prospects out of the lineup.

But, I like Whitecloud, and I don’t think the difference between him and Andersson is a 1st (hopefully 2 firsts) and a lottery ticket. So in terms of value it seems pretty good.

I laugh a little bit at Vegas getting Andersson though, Handersson has already proven to be an awful pairing so it will be funny to watch that implode again. Stone and Eichel will probably be able to power them past anything at least to the western final though. This satisfies the E=NG requirement so honestly it’s all good.
__________________
Oliver Kylington is the greatest and best player in the world
bigrangy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2026, 06:05 AM   #1243
Ped
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

I thought the advanced stats shows that Hanifin-Andersson were a very good pairing but I could be remembering wrong.
Ped is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2026, 06:06 AM   #1244
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache View Post
And why exactly should Ras maximize the return for the team dumping him?

(And weaken the team that wants him)

Where did I say he should do that?

Let me answer my own question. I didnt.

Last edited by Roof-Daddy; 01-19-2026 at 06:09 AM.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2026, 06:40 AM   #1245
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
Where did I say he should do that?

Let me answer my own question. I didnt.

No you didn’t say that, but what it sounded like you found must be frustrating for Conroy was directly a product of that, no?

Therefore reasonably expected. And perhaps not so frustrating to a guy going in with eyes open?
DeluxeMoustache is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2026, 06:59 AM   #1246
bax
#1 Goaltender
 
bax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ped View Post
I thought the advanced stats shows that Hanifin-Andersson were a very good pairing but I could be remembering wrong.
You’re right. Not sure what the above poster is remembering, but Hanifin and Andersson consistently out chanced and outscored the opposition when they were paired together
bax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2026, 07:07 AM   #1247
Claes
Farm Team Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache View Post
And why exactly should Ras maximize the return for the team dumping him?



(And weaken the team that wants him)
Maybe him being loyal to the team drafted him and gave him a chance being a pro? Haven't the Flames tested him well for a decade?

But I don't think that played a role in him deciding what to do. I think he bets on himself continuing having a great season with strong play in the Olympics and what he hopes to be a long playoff run, and increase his market value before signing a long life-altering contract.
Claes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2026, 07:11 AM   #1248
CalgaryFan1988
Franchise Player
 
CalgaryFan1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

At the end of the day Andersson didn't do the Flames any favors, he looked out for himself and that's well within his rights because it is his life and it's business. Shouldn't be any hard feelings from any fans.

That being said, I hope Conroy learned from this and tries to maximize players values in the future. Looking at the big picture and trading players that aren't part of the future with term instead of trading them as rentals and getting minimal return.

We have few assets, these returns are hurting us long-term.
CalgaryFan1988 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to CalgaryFan1988 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-19-2026, 07:11 AM   #1249
kehatch
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random View Post
The benefit of moving Ras out was to get futures. Whitecloud was a throw-in to make the cap and roster numbers work. Vegas could not have kept Whitecloud and added Andersson, even at 50% retained, without getting rid of another player in a side deal. They could have traded a defenceman lower on their depth chart, but Conroy did not want any of those.

The team had seven defencemen on the active NHL roster before, and still has seven. That's the minimum number that allows for an injury replacement or a healthy scratch. No team likes to carry fewer than seven. When Parekh comes back from his conditioning stint, there will be plenty of time to trade away another body to make room.
Whitecloud was not a throw in. He was Vegas number 4 D man and he is signed for 2 more years after this one. He is part of the return and takes away from the future focused assets. If the Flames flipped him for a return this wouldn't be an issue, but that is unlikely.

Sure, the Flames need players to fill minutes. But this is a supposedly rebuilding team that put Kuznetsov on waivers to keep Bean, etc. It's more of the same. Holding on to an asset too long, then targetting an replacement in the return, all in pursuit of the mighty 14 OA pick.
kehatch is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to kehatch For This Useful Post:
Old 01-19-2026, 07:16 AM   #1250
fotze2
electric boogaloo
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Claes View Post
Maybe him being loyal to the team drafted him and gave him a chance being a pro? Haven't the Flames tested him well for a decade?

But I don't think that played a role in him deciding what to do. I think he bets on himself continuing having a great season with strong play in the Olympics and what he hopes to be a long playoff run, and increase his market value before signing a long life-altering contract.
The draft is not for the player, it for the league and teams benefit specifically designed to prevent the player from having free will to play where they want. Its the orderly distribution of talent. Loyalty is a two way street.

If your employer prevented you from going to work across the street for double the pay. While no one would like that.
fotze2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2026, 07:17 AM   #1251
PeteMoss
Franchise Player
 
PeteMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kehatch View Post
Whitecloud was not a throw in. He was Vegas number 4 D man and he is signed for 2 more years after this one. He is part of the return and takes away from the future focused assets. If the Flames flipped him for a return this wouldn't be an issue, but that is unlikely.



Sure, the Flames need players to fill minutes. But this is a supposedly rebuilding team that put Kuznetsov on waivers to keep Bean, etc. It's more of the same. Holding on to an asset too long, then targetting an replacement in the return, all in pursuit of the mighty 14 OA pick.
For Vegas... They need to move someone to get cap complaint. He's not a typical cap casuality in that he has value given his low hit but Vegas needed to move some more salary to activate their LTIR players.
PeteMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to PeteMoss For This Useful Post:
Old 01-19-2026, 07:17 AM   #1252
Ped
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

Saw this morning somewhere that by adding Whitecloud and the Flames retaining, it gives Vegas enough room to add McNabb back from LTIR, so there's a reason they included him. It doesn't mean he's a throw-in, and he's not Miromanov - he is a legitimate NHL player, but I think he's only top-4 on Vegas because of their lack of depth.
Ped is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2026, 07:23 AM   #1253
kehatch
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Claes View Post
Maybe him being loyal to the team drafted him and gave him a chance being a pro? Haven't the Flames tested him well for a decade?
The Flames didn't give him a chance out of charity. Andersson covered his end and then some by doing his job, with an incredible value contract. He owed the Flames nothing, and was under zero obligation to sign an extension to get the Flames a better return.
kehatch is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kehatch For This Useful Post:
Old 01-19-2026, 07:24 AM   #1254
Macho0978
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CalgaryFan1988 View Post
At the end of the day Andersson didn't do the Flames any favors, he looked out for himself and that's well within his rights because it is his life and it's business. Shouldn't be any hard feelings from any fans.

That being said, I hope Conroy learned from this and tries to maximize players values in the future. Looking at the big picture and trading players that aren't part of the future with term instead of trading them as rentals and getting minimal return.

We have few assets, these returns are hurting us long-term.
Twice the player did not do him any favours. If a player does not sign in the summer, he probably isn't signing during the season. Ras was coming off a bad season and maybe the offers got better as he played better this season. But his ask probably increased too. Sounds like term was a big deal for the Flames, they probably were not interested in 8 years at all, and Ras more than likely 100% wants 8 years. If that is not going to change for both parties in the summer, why would Ras in the middle of a one of his best seasons suddenly settle.

These deals need to happen in the summer move forward IMO. I would not be shocked if this was not the best offer over the last 6 month.
Macho0978 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Macho0978 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-19-2026, 07:27 AM   #1255
wpgflamesfan
3 Wolves Short of 2 Millionth Post
 
wpgflamesfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
The Flames are one of the youngest teams in the NHL and will likely be younger in a month. This idea they don't play young players is false.
That’s absolutely false when you factor in usage.
wpgflamesfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2026, 07:41 AM   #1256
Cali Panthers Fan
Franchise Player
 
Cali Panthers Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Exp:
Default

As always, with trades that involve picks, especially picks several years down the road, it becomes difficult, if not impossible, to evaluate the absolute quality of this trade.

We saw this with the other recent trades for picks. Everyone was pretty upset at the time. Then you start making those picks and see the young quality talent added to the system and eventually the starting roster.

Take the Markstrom trade alone. At the time, people were freaking out that the Flames didn't get enough for him, saying they could have done better if it happened earlier. Many posters here panned the trade, saying that Bahl wouldn't be anything better than a 6/7. The pick alone didn't factor into anyone's thinking because we didn't know who it would be yet. Fast forward, and we now have Bahl, who I think at minimum is a strong #4 shutdown d-man on a contending team (think Mikkola for a recent comparable on a cup winner), and Cole Reschny, who projects to be a really good two-way center with character and scoring ability, seen recently on the World Junior roster for Team Canada (not an easy roster to crack). Reschny likely ends up as a 2nd line center on a good team, maybe a 3rd line center at the very worst. All of that for Markstrom, who's play has declined and is now considered an expensive back up in New Jersey.

I love Andersson, but he was playing at his absolute peak this year, and he's likely near the peak levels for his career. In a couple years, his play will probably start to decline, and at that point, we'll have drafted a player that will likely be an important roster piece for our contention window, just like Reschny. There are several other pieces involved here as well that could contribute more than we could imagine right now, or at least mitigate against that 1st round pick not working out as anticipated (see: Honzek).

The bet made by Conroy here is that Vegas is going to age out of their contention window in 2 years, and those picks will suddenly have a lot more value than they do right now. In 2 seasons, they will only have Eichel, Marner, Hertl, and Barbashev (final year) signed as forwards, and Theodore, Hanifin, Korczak and McNabb signed on defense, unless Andersson signs as well. However, given that he seems intent on testing free agency, Andersson signing with Vegas isn't 100%. That's an okay core of players, but the parity around the league shows us that it doesn't take much to have a down year or to suddenly fall out of contention (look at Winnipeg, Toronto, and even Florida as examples).

When you also consider that Vegas has little to nothing coming up in their prospect base to replace their older supporting cast, it seems to me that it's a really good bet to take the Vegas picks later, especially if they have a chance to win the cup this year. Sure it hurts our 2026 draft pick if they win, but if they do, the 2nd becomes a first in 2028, and that pick could be quite high unless they rapidly retool and sign a bunch of UFAs to surround that core. Let's also not forget that in 2 years, that core is going to be in it's early to mid 30's, and no longer at their peak.

These are the kind of moves that really do have long-term thinking involved. If you were hoping for a massive win that pays off right now, then you don't have the patience for an actual rebuild. You know, the thing the entire base is clamoring for. This is what it looks like. Let it play out.
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
Cali Panthers Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Cali Panthers Fan For This Useful Post:
Old 01-19-2026, 07:42 AM   #1257
Fan69
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Exp:
Default

This is frustrating as a fan as i see three different instances where we took less trying to be the good guy.

To my mind the johnny situation was no different. Then Hannafin now Rasmus.

Now i do believe it was a decent not spectacular trade but this getting caught last minute has to stop.
Fan69 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2026, 07:51 AM   #1258
Scroopy Noopers
Pent-up
 
Scroopy Noopers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Claes View Post
Maybe him being loyal to the team drafted him and gave him a chance being a pro? Haven't the Flames tested him well for a decade?.
… would you say the same thing to an employee of a company who wasn’t an pro athlete? This is a terrible take.
Scroopy Noopers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2026, 07:52 AM   #1259
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss View Post
For Vegas... They need to move someone to get cap complaint. He's not a typical cap casuality in that he has value given his low hit but Vegas needed to move some more salary to activate their LTIR players.
Also they were carrying a full 23 man roster and were at the 50 contract limit. They had to move a defenceman to fit Andersson in, so this was the only way, unless they traded Whitecloud to a different contender for a pick
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2026, 07:54 AM   #1260
TherapyforGlencross
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

If we bottom out the rest of this season, land a top 5 pick next year in 2027, i see our rebuild finishing by the end of next year.

Top 6 Forwards:
Reschny
Potter
Gridin
Coronato
Outside chances of Wyttenbach, Basha, Honzek.

Defence:
Parekh
Bruz
Kuz
Outside chances of Mews, Morin

Goalies
Wolf
Cooley

Our goaltending is already set for year to come. Adding four more first round players in 2026 and 2027 adds to potential top 6 players. We are rounding out quite nicely and Conroy has done an exceptional job in stockpiling the cupboard. One or two more defenceman would do Calgary wonders, along with adding a top drafted centre either this year or next.
TherapyforGlencross is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:47 PM.

Calgary Flames
2025-26






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy