Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum

View Poll Results: Reaction to the trade?
Hate it 3 0.51%
Dislike it 11 1.87%
Whelmed 161 27.38%
Like it 350 59.52%
Love it 63 10.71%
Voters: 588. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-19-2024, 11:43 PM   #801
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

I know this will be a minority opinion but I actually think Pelletier has higher upside and might be a better NHLer than Coronato. Coronato sometimes lacks killer instinct and work ethic can slide and I think he’s less skilled than Pelletier and I think Pelletier has a harder work ethic.

We’ll see I guess and would love to be pleasantly surprised. On the upside I think Coronato’s shot is extremely good, but I struggle to see how he gets his skating and compete level there. I think so many fans overlook Pelletier because he was injured, basically.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2024, 11:46 PM   #802
Flames Fan, Ph.D.
#1 Goaltender
 
Flames Fan, Ph.D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Underground
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
I know this will be a minority opinion but I actually think Pelletier has higher upside and might be a better NHLer than Coronato. Coronato sometimes lacks killer instinct and work ethic can slide and I think he’s less skilled than Pelletier and I think Pelletier has a harder work ethic.

We’ll see I guess and would love to be pleasantly surprised. On the upside I think Coronato’s shot is extremely good, but I struggle to see how he gets his skating and compete level there. I think so many fans overlook Pelletier because he was injured, basically.
I sure hope you’re right.

I look at Pelletier play and think Lazar. And not the NJ Lazar.
Flames Fan, Ph.D. is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2024, 11:48 PM   #803
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

He can be a little inconsistent, I agree, but so can Coronato. I think fans rely a lot on draft positioning to tell them what to think but truly Pelletier’s stickhandlinh and playmaking is elite level.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2024, 11:50 PM   #804
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
1st, young dman, and 4M cap space

and people are complaining?
Overall it’s an average trade.

You’ll frame it now as if it wasn’t a top 5 goalie. But a day ago if we were talking about what to expect you’d say a lot because he’s a top 5 goalie.

It’s an okay trade. Could be worse, could’ve been better.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2024, 11:51 PM   #805
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dion View Post
We'd have 7 in the next 3 years if not for Treliving as well. He also already traded Toronto's 1st in 2025.

He just can't help himself.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to FlamesAddiction For This Useful Post:
Old 06-20-2024, 12:04 AM   #806
Ferarri
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Exp:
Default

The market dictated the return and not much you can do about that. Would be nice to see Calgary get a “wow” return on one of the core pieces they moved. Sometimes you see trades being made and you think “can’t believe that guy got such a big haul.” All of Calgary’s trades probably translate to fair market value but would be nice to be in on a lopsided trade that favours the Flames. Yes, easier said than done but one can dream.
Ferarri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2024, 12:13 AM   #807
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

The Lindholm trade was pretty ‘wow’. The Flames not only got the current best player in the deal, but a first, a very interesting prospect, and a throw-in – all under team control, while Lindholm himself is ready to walk.

In retrospect, the Toffoli trade is up there, too. The Flames got back a player with similar production, but younger and cheaper; dodged an expensive re-signing; and added a pick while doing it.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2024, 12:22 AM   #808
nieuwy-89
First Line Centre
 
nieuwy-89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Iggy-ville
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Nope

Here is the Cole’s notes:

Flames get the Panthers from the Tkachuk trade if it is not in the top 10. If it is in the top 10 the Habs will get the Flames pick unless it is 1st overall.

If both picks are outside the top 10 the Habs get the highest of the 2 so Calgary could give up the 11th pick if that is where theirs lands
Seriously wtf was Treliving thinking? Man did he ever screw up in that last season.
nieuwy-89 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to nieuwy-89 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-20-2024, 12:24 AM   #809
868904
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
I said there might be teams that would overpay, and that Pospisil is a risk for a short Ferland-like career. I like Pospisil but he’s a guy that might be a bit of a flash in the pan.
It’s unlikely. No one overpaid for Ferland or Bennett. Given the returns we got for those two heart and soul guys, I’d rather we have kept them.
__________________
Calgary Flames, PLEASE GO TO THE NET! AND SHOOT THE PUCK! GENERATING OFFENSE IS NOT DIFFICULT! SKATE HARD, SHOOT HARD, CRASH THE NET HARD!
868904 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2024, 01:00 AM   #810
jg13
Franchise Player
 
jg13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Do we pick 6 times in the next 3 years as it stands or do we pick 5 times in the next 3 years because of the Monahan trade
jg13 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2024, 01:04 AM   #811
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jg13 View Post
Do we pick 6 times in the next 3 years as it stands or do we pick 5 times in the next 3 years because of the Monahan trade
5 times. Just depends on placement of the FLA and Flames picks at the end of the year.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2024, 01:06 AM   #812
Circa89
Scoring Winger
 
Circa89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Fan, Ph.D. View Post
I sure hope you’re right.

I look at Pelletier play and think Lazar. And not the NJ Lazar.
Man I hope you are wrong because I cannot unsee that now.
Circa89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2024, 01:15 AM   #813
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
5 times. Just depends on placement of the FLA and Flames picks at the end of the year.
It’s 6. 2024 Ours and VAN. 2025 Ours, NJ, FLA - One to MTL. 2026 Ours and Vegas.
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to topfiverecords For This Useful Post:
Old 06-20-2024, 01:16 AM   #814
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
5 times. Just depends on placement of the FLA and Flames picks at the end of the year.
I'm confused. I think we pick 6 times no matter what. The Flames currently have seven 1st rounders in play over the next 3 seasons, but one of those has to go to Montreal. That would leave us with 6.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2024, 01:52 AM   #815
gvitaly
Franchise Player
 
gvitaly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EVERLAST View Post
Love this. You tube shows his scraps . He holds his own. Better fighter than Regher.
Conroy immediately said he's a Zadorov comparison but younger and likely more upside In terms of he's got more upside....he hits like Regher and Z and looks more mobile than both.

Guy hasn't even stepped on the ice yet and people are bithcing. We need an Engelland type player on the back end that can do it all without hesitation and he checks allot of boxes according to Connie himself.
I see things a bit differently. He doesn't hit as much or as hard as either Regher or Z. A guy like Okhotiuk is more physical than Bahl is.

IMO strength is disrupting the cycle, clearing the net and getting pucks back. He relies more on stick checks than physical play to seperate forwards off the puck in transition.

He needs to work on his first pass and carrying the puck out of the zone. Remember how Z used to pass when he just got here? So yeah, his teammates will have to be ready for the puck to be in their skates.

He is a worse skater than Z, I think he's more similar to Gudbranson in that regard.

Another place where he's similar to Z when we got him is taking a bunch of needles penalties.

I think he would best compliment a guy like Andersson or Kylington on a pairing. If he ends up paired with Pachal expect the Flames to have no transition game while they're on the ice.
gvitaly is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to gvitaly For This Useful Post:
Old 06-20-2024, 02:28 AM   #816
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2024, 05:02 AM   #817
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jg13 View Post
Do we pick 6 times in the next 3 years as it stands or do we pick 5 times in the next 3 years because of the Monahan trade
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
5 times. Just depends on placement of the FLA and Flames picks at the end of the year.
As others have mentioned, as of right now it's 6 1st round picks.

It WOULD be 7 if not for the Monahan trade.

2024 - CGY, VAN
2025 - CGY OR FLA, NJD conditional
2026 - CGY, VGK (NJD if their 2025 1st is top 10)
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
Old 06-20-2024, 05:24 AM   #818
gvitaly
Franchise Player
 
gvitaly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
As others have mentioned, as of right now it's 6 1st round picks.

It WOULD be 7 if not for the Monahan trade.

2024 - CGY, VAN
2025 - CGY OR FLA, NJD conditional
2026 - CGY, VGK (NJD if their 2025 1st is top 10)
Would you trade Kadri for that 1st? I think we still can. Trade Kadri for a 1st that is.

I think we got a decent player as a result of that cap space, and he has been our best forward last year, playing at a PPG pace after the first ~10 games of the season.

This management has gotten a lot better at turning UFA signings into assets. Markstrom, Tanev, Coleman, and Kadri all seem to be worth their contracts, and then some.

Moreover some finds like Sharangovich, Kuzmenko, Pachal, and Greer make me believe in the pro scouting staff a lot more.

Last edited by gvitaly; 06-20-2024 at 05:27 AM.
gvitaly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2024, 05:45 AM   #819
Geeoff
Franchise Player
 
Geeoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction View Post
I can't find the original post to quote, but that Athletic write-up saying that Conroy has lost every trade he made is dumb for so many reasons.

First, most of the trades he made either included futures or was straight up for futures. It will take years to fairly judge the trades (Tanev and Zadorov trades for example).

Second, the Toffoli and Lindholm trades are showing really good early returns.

Third, it's impossible to say if something is a bad trade when you don't know what else was on the table, if anything at all.
Perhaps, The Athletic graded it based on the Flames trying to make the playoffs, since that IS what Conroy said they were trying to do lol
Geeoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2024, 06:02 AM   #820
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gvitaly View Post
Would you trade Kadri for that 1st? I think we still can. Trade Kadri for a 1st that is.

.
No, nobody will give you a 1st for that contract . He’ll be 34 with 5 more years to go at 7M

While Kadri had performed ok for his contract so far it was needless.

Treliving ####ed up, there is no way to spin it
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:24 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy