Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community
Old 06-27-2023, 09:54 PM   #661
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamNotKenKing View Post
You’re probably right. Conroy took less than you suspect he could have received just ‘cause…
No it’s more likely that he didn’t counter aggressively enough, again obviously just guessing here. He has a new relationship management thing he has to get going with 31 GMs and the establishment of a reputation to consider. But, put yourself in NJ’s shoes. If he asked you for a 2nd, would you still do the trade? I would.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2023, 09:55 PM   #662
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

https://twitter.com/user/status/1673879751579287554
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to transplant99 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-27-2023, 10:00 PM   #663
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleK View Post
He's not a bottom 6 player. Meier took his spot.

Your stat is irrelevant and doesn't mean anything, if you actually watched the Devils play more than twice a year you wouldn't have made your original post, and for sure wouldn't have doubled down on an awful take.
What stat are you talking about? He was healthy scratched for 9 of 12 playoff games. That’s not a “take”. Get over yourself.

Your claim is that he wasn’t good enough for their top six. And he’s not a “bottom six” player.

You’re welcome to your definition of bottom six, I suspect it differs from how I think about it. I guess if he’s not good enough for the Flames top 6 he will be scratched here as well.
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2023, 10:01 PM   #664
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
There is no sneaking into the playoffs...it takes 96-100 points

You have to have a good season
94 & 92 was enough to get in this year. Why jump to 96-100?
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2023, 10:03 PM   #665
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Toffoli is not a 70 point player year in and year out. But the fact is he got way more PP time and attention here than anywhere else and it boosted his numbers. It may or may not for this kid but who’s to say it won’t? An increased role did wonders for Lindholm. It did wonders for Bennett in Fla. Look at what happened when Chandler Stephenson had to assume a bigger role in Vegas.
Vegas and Seattle are great cases for what can happen when you give under-appreciated guys more opportunity.

You’d think people would’ve learned watching Bennett in the finals. But nope, new guy is done at 25 and forever a mediocre 3rd liner.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
No it’s more likely that he didn’t counter aggressively enough, again obviously just guessing here. He has a new relationship management thing he has to get going with 31 GMs and the establishment of a reputation to consider. But, put yourself in NJ’s shoes. If he asked you for a 2nd, would you still do the trade? I would.
Or he did counter aggressively enough and got the best deal, because he’s been an NHL executive for 10 years and around the league for 30 and knows exactly how these things work and exactly what he’s doing.

Or the guy with 0 NHL management experience knows better.

Honest question, what do you think is more likely?
PepsiFree is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post:
Old 06-27-2023, 10:04 PM   #666
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by topfiverecords View Post
94 & 92 was enough to get in this year. Why jump to 96-100?
It was below average this season and the Flames needed 95 the east is irrelevant

Snake is set at 96 for a reason...with lots of up and coming teams closer to 100 seems likely
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2023, 10:06 PM   #667
All In Good Time
First Line Centre
 
All In Good Time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: I'm somewhere where I don't know where I am
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
No it’s more likely that he didn’t counter aggressively enough, again obviously just guessing here. He has a new relationship management thing he has to get going with 31 GMs and the establishment of a reputation to consider. But, put yourself in NJ’s shoes. If he asked you for a 2nd, would you still do the trade? I would.
Just guessing here too
But
Perhaps the flames did press for a second but considering jersey doesn’t have a first this year, that might be enough for them to walk from the deal
All In Good Time is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2023, 10:07 PM   #668
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
Vegas and Seattle are great cases for what can happen when you give under-appreciated guys more opportunity.

You’d think people would’ve learned watching Bennett in the finals. But nope, new guy is done at 25 and forever a mediocre 3rd liner.



Or he did counter aggressively enough and got the best deal, because he’s been an NHL executive for 10 years and around the league for 30 and knows exactly how these things work and exactly what he’s doing.

Or the guy with 0 NHL management experience knows better.

Honest question, what do you think is more likely?
My scenario
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2023, 10:08 PM   #669
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by All In Good Time View Post
Just guessing here too
But
Perhaps the flames did press for a second but considering jersey doesn’t have a first this year, that might be enough for them to walk from the deal
Yeah that’s definitely possible. I think I’d walk in that instance and see what’s available tomorrow then. Or request a higher pick for a future year. Either or.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mr.Coffee For This Useful Post:
Old 06-27-2023, 10:08 PM   #670
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
My scenario
Seems delusional, to be honest.
PepsiFree is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2023, 10:09 PM   #671
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Yeah Sam Bennett was a healthy scratch for the Flames multiple times too... doesn't mean a guys career is done
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2023, 10:10 PM   #672
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
Seems delusional, to be honest.
Agree to disagree.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2023, 10:10 PM   #673
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Toffoli has averaged 08.ppg in 218 games since leaving LA. He had a manageable cap hit where the Flames could have retained and no trade protection. A lot of talk about leadership qualities from St. Louis, Sutter, world championship captain. It feels like he should be worth quite a bit more.

If it was a 2nd I would have been fine with it but not a big fan. I will say the Flames do lack forwards upfront in the 23-27 age range so this helps with that
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2023, 10:12 PM   #674
Elkyiv
Scoring Winger
 
Elkyiv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Trades like this won't make a difference in the grand scheme of things. So many other factors have to go right for a team to be successful that dissecting a single trade such as this is pointless.
Elkyiv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2023, 10:13 PM   #675
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
Doubt it. My suspicion is a 2nd could have been had, but obviously just a hunch.
It’s probable that someone offered a late 2nd. I’d rather have the affordable 6’2 center 24 goal scorer and a mid 3rd myself though.
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to topfiverecords For This Useful Post:
Old 06-27-2023, 10:14 PM   #676
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Reminder that 35% of mid to late round 1sts dont play 100 games let alone have 20 goal seasons
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
Old 06-27-2023, 10:14 PM   #677
gvitaly
Franchise Player
 
gvitaly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Toffoli is not a 70 point player year in and year out. But the fact is he got way more PP time and attention here than anywhere else and it boosted his numbers. It may or may not for this kid but who’s to say it won’t? An increased role did wonders for Lindholm. It did wonders for Bennett in Fla. Look at what happened when Chandler Stephenson had to assume a bigger role in Vegas.
So can Ruzicka, who also had a decent production 5 on 5 in a much smaller sample size. Yet I would be pretty ecstatic if we could trade Ruzicka and a 3rd for even a 60 pt player making $4.5M. We paid a 2nd and a 3rd for a ~40pt Jarnkrok at the deadline.

Also, when it come to an increased role, there are many players on the Flames that could potentially benefit from it. Starting from Mangiapane and Dube getting PP1 time, to prospects like Pelletier, Coronato, Ruzicka, and maybe even Phillips (if he's back). That's why I personally don't expect anything over 40pts from the shiny new toy. Furthermore, in this discussion we're sticking to points, while Toffoli definitely had a much greater effect at both generating chances and preventing chances against. That's why in my opinion NJ won the trade by a mile.
gvitaly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2023, 10:15 PM   #678
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

I doubt Toffoli is seen as a missing ingredient for many contending or near contending teams, frankly. Those teams all have wingers who are better. Some of them, like Colorado, lack a good 2C. Some of them like Toronto need more help on D. But a slow winger who has a scoring touch? Just not a pressing need for most of them.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2023, 10:15 PM   #679
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by topfiverecords View Post
It’s probable that someone offered a late 2nd. I’d rather have the affordable 6’2 center 24 goal scorer and a mid 3rd myself though.
I wasn’t suggesting either or, I was suggesting Shara plus the 2nd. Just an opinion, and I’m guessing based on the wide spread general reaction NOT on CP, I would think others agree with my assessment of the value.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2023, 10:16 PM   #680
CDN
Draft Pick
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
He'll be a winger here. Almost exclusively played on Hughes' wing in NJ.
I can see this guy being a frolik type player. Not elite but very complimentary to a top line.
Does anyone have a highlight pack of this guy ??
CDN is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:49 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy