[GT] Jets @ Flames 02/21/2022

[Skaloper]

Originally Posted by Scornfire

One of those rules where the letter of it defeats the spirit of the rule itself tbh. When you're talking about centimeters what the fk does it actually matter, it's not a real advantage when it's so fkin close you need to go frame by frame

Exactly, video review should be used for where it's clear a mistake was made. Anything where it takes you to slow it down frame by frame is out of the spirit of the game in my opinion.

[Enoch Root]

If you have a line, you have a line

If you have technology to review it, you review it.

[getbak]

Originally Posted by DropIt

Completely over? The puck on the blue line counts

Not on zone entries, only on zone clears. It's a really poorly-written rule.

[btimbit]

Originally Posted by Enoch Root

If you have a line, you have a line

If you have technology to review it, you review it.

I've harped on this for years but I want them to just get rid of the blue line. For the same reasons we got rid of the red line

[MrMike]

Winnipeg is such a boring team.

[Manhattanboy]

Afternoon games sure are different for some reason.

Don’t like them in the playoffs.

[Reggie Dunlop]

Monny almost gets another

[browna]

Originally Posted by Skaloper

Exactly, video review should be used for where it's clear a mistake was made. Anything where it takes you to slow it down frame by frame is out of the spirit of the game in my opinion.

Including pucks fully not crossing the goal line?
Kylington messed that up by slowing up before he got the puck in.

[djsFlames]

Originally Posted by Skaloper

Exactly, video review should be used for where it's clear a mistake was made. Anything where it takes you to slow it down frame by frame is out of the spirit of the game in my opinion.

Only time you should be slowing down and analyzing frames is on the goal line or crease for contact.

In my opinion.

If we're going to go into the centimeter game, have machines that are able to monitor the line and call the play down as it happens. If you can't accomplish that, then this redacting whole shifts or rushes over a couple frames shouldn't be a thing.

If it's that close the play should be let go, I don't care what team it is.

I'm far less stringent about close offsides than missed penalties or whether the puck is fully across the goal line.

[GranteedEV]

Originally Posted by browna

Including pucks fully not crossing the goal line?
Kylington messed that up by slowing up before he got the puck in.

the blue line should have the same thickness as the goal line

[SuperMatt18]

Originally Posted by getbak

Not on zone entries, only on zone clears. It's a really poorly-written rule.

This is the problem with the blue line - it’s considered both on and out of the zone.

On zone entries it’s not in the zone yet, zone exits as long as it’s on the line it’s still in the zone.

Worst part of explaining the blueline and rules to kids.

[GioforPM]

Nice play resulting in a Powerplay.

[AC]

Great 4th line shift.

[WhiteTiger]

Dang, so close

[Bonded]

Dayum, nice chance

[GioforPM]

Originally Posted by GranteedEV

the blue line should have the same thickness as the goal line

Sutter advocated for thicker blue lines (but I think a different rule on when the puck clears).

[Enoch Root]

Originally Posted by GranteedEV

the blue line should have the same thickness as the goal line

What difference would it make? The puck is still completely over, or it isn't.

The good thing about fat lines is they are easy to see from afar, while on the ice

[tvp2003]

Originally Posted by Reggie Dunlop

Some kid doing the PA?

Chris Snow’s son, Cohen:

https://twitter.com/user/status/1495880494029828102

[GirlySports]

Originally Posted by Skaloper

Exactly, video review should be used for where it's clear a mistake was made. Anything where it takes you to slow it down frame by frame is out of the spirit of the game in my opinion.

Replays are black and white. This is why people are against using replay.

[Reggie Dunlop]

Shots 25-15 for the Flames