Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community
Old 02-06-2022, 09:10 PM   #8121
Harry Lime
Franchise Player
 
Harry Lime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99 View Post
Full NMC....would he waive for Calgary? Highly doubtful.
He has already said that he would return to Philly as a UFA, if I remember correctly. His only criteria on a deadline trade would be to go to a contender. So, in his mind does Calgary qualify?
__________________
"By Grabthar's hammer ... what a savings."
Harry Lime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2022, 09:11 PM   #8122
powderjunkie
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
82 point career high

Being injured and having a higher ppg isn't exactly a good thing IMO

I like my 10M players to have 100 points
He played 145 out of a possible 151 games from 2018-COVID stoppage. 64G 160 pts.

He was on track for 93 pts in 80.8 games in 19-20.


Pretty sure the 36 games he missed in his 2nd and 3rd years were both ankle injuries. Obviously the neck injury is a different ball game, but I'm not sure it's even fair to consider him otherwise injury prone. He playing at the end of the season 5/6 years (ie. would have been available for playoffs)
powderjunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2022, 02:37 AM   #8123
Sandman
Franchise Player
 
Sandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Mike Johnson of TSN said he's been hearing Giroux to Colorado or "maybe Calgary"....

Last edited by Sandman; 02-07-2022 at 03:18 AM.
Sandman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2022, 02:40 AM   #8124
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Oh man, Giroux to the Flames would be awesome. Here's to hoping we aren't the bridesmaid yet again. But history tells us, we will always be the bridesmaid. Dang it Colorado, dang it.

Can they even fit even a 50 percent retained Giroux on their roster?

Edit: Don't know how the Avs could fit Giroux in there. They have the same cap at the deadline as they do today at 1.6 which is less than half of what they'd need. On top of not having their 1st and 2nd round picks in the 22 draft either.

They'd have to move something significant from the roster to balance out the value.

Flames can make it work with futures at the deadline. And dumping some deadweight from the forwards.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond

Last edited by dammage79; 02-07-2022 at 02:50 AM.
dammage79 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-07-2022, 03:40 AM   #8125
Sandman
Franchise Player
 
Sandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Interestingly enough, in Claude Giroux's first 57 playoff games, he had 61 points. In his last 28 playoff games, he has 12 points. Those numbers are a reflection of the team, IMO. Obviously, he would be a huge help to this team.
Sandman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2022, 06:15 AM   #8126
Monahammer
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

Giroux is a perfect fit for our playoff run imo. He has unfinished business too, don't forget.

Mangiapane-monahan-giroux could be absolutely lethal
Monahammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2022, 06:35 AM   #8127
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

I don’t like the price it will take to get Giroux. 1st +,+ for a guy who will be here and gone after the deadline so anything less than an incredibly deep run it will be a lot of regret making that deal.
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2022, 06:38 AM   #8128
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

I don’t really like the idea of giving up a 1st + for a pure rental like giroux . If I was Tre I would be seeing how much the cost would be for konecy. He can score, lays some hits, has term, and is a s**t disturber .
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2022, 06:45 AM   #8129
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275 View Post
I don’t really like the idea of giving up a 1st + for a pure rental like giroux . If I was Tre I would be seeing how much the cost would be for konecy. He can score, lays some hits, has term, and is a s**t disturber .
It would be tons more for the very reasons you say. They have no particular reason to move him.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2022, 06:48 AM   #8130
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
I don’t like the price it will take to get Giroux. 1st +,+ for a guy who will be here and gone after the deadline so anything less than an incredibly deep run it will be a lot of regret making that deal.
That's the very nature of deadline deals.

You can argue that anything short of the Cup makes the trade a failure.

But when teams are in contention, any move which increases you slim chance of winning the Cup (and let's face it, the odds are long for any team to win the Cup) is often considered worthwhile.

The odds are very good that it will result in regret. But, there is some slim chance it might just work out with a Cup win.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to The Cobra For This Useful Post:
Old 02-07-2022, 07:12 AM   #8131
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Wasn't sure who said it last week (Friedman? - I'll try to find it if its online) but apparently players from Colorado are already trying to recruit Giroux.

This is the only reference to that report that I can find at the moment. Vague but I think Friedman expanded on this but may have been on the Marek Show

https://www.sportsnet.ca/nhl/article...-lesson-learn/

7. During All-Star, expect Claude Giroux to sit down with his agent (Pat Brisson) to discuss his future. I think there are Avalanche players who’d love to have him. The question is if the organization decides that’s the move they need to make. The right-hand shot makes sense. But it won’t be easy for Colorado to fit. That means the possibility of a third team, which raises the asset cost. There’s still time for it to play out, and Giroux has control.

Last edited by Toonage; 02-07-2022 at 07:21 AM.
Toonage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2022, 07:16 AM   #8132
SportsJunky
Uncle Chester
 
SportsJunky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

I'm interested in Garland from Vancouver.
SportsJunky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2022, 07:17 AM   #8133
keenan87
Franchise Player
 
keenan87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flames Town
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
Wasn't sure who said it last week (Friedman? - I'll try to find it if its online) but apparently players from Colorado are already trying to recruit Giroux.
Isn't that tampering?
keenan87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2022, 07:17 AM   #8134
jg13
Franchise Player
 
jg13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
Wasn't sure who said it last week (Friedman? - I'll try to find it if its online) but apparently players from Colorado are already trying to recruit Giroux.
what exactly does this mean? its up to the GM to trade for him and surely they can't afford to sign him as a UFA next season
jg13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2022, 07:18 AM   #8135
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Means that if Giroux decides to move (he holds the cards) that his buddies in Colorado want him to choose the Avs.
Toonage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2022, 07:18 AM   #8136
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by keenan87 View Post
Isn't that tampering?
I don't think so? Not when a player says he'd like to see you on his team.
Toonage is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Toonage For This Useful Post:
Old 02-07-2022, 07:23 AM   #8137
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra View Post
It would be tons more for the very reasons you say. They have no particular reason to move him.
Yes it would cost more but then you have him for x number of years . Philly gm last week mentioned some untouchables and konecy name was not mentioned. Granted he might have forgotten about him.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2022, 07:38 AM   #8138
Scroopy Noopers
Pent-up
 
Scroopy Noopers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
I don't think so? Not when a player says he'd like to see you on his team.
It’s why Iggy chose Pittsburgh. Not tampering.
Scroopy Noopers is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Scroopy Noopers For This Useful Post:
Old 02-07-2022, 07:51 AM   #8139
Royle9
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Thankfully I cant see him choosing the Flames over the Avs.

Personally I'd rather not give up our 1st ++ for a UFA rental who likely won't resign here anyway. Also not really keen on giving up high draft picks this year given the uncertainty surrounding Johnny's future here and trying to chase a cup just because we can.

I don't buy the "show Johnny we want to win" mantra, we've done that the last 3-4 years and have nothing to show for it. If he's not going to talk contract at all until after the season is over Tre's backed himself into a really bad corner, and this deadline could sink the franchise even further by surrendering high picks and then losing Johnny for nothing.
Royle9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2022, 07:57 AM   #8140
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Royle9 View Post
Thankfully I cant see him choosing the Flames over the Avs.

Personally I'd rather not give up our 1st ++ for a UFA rental who likely won't resign here anyway. Also not really keen on giving up high draft picks this year given the uncertainty surrounding Johnny's future here and trying to chase a cup just because we can.

I don't buy the "show Johnny we want to win" mantra, we've done that the last 3-4 years and have nothing to show for it. If he's not going to talk contract at all until after the season is over Tre's backed himself into a really bad corner, and this deadline could sink the franchise even further by surrendering high picks and then losing Johnny for nothing.
Giroux would never be anything more than a deadline deal. His cap hit will be too high for Calgary to fit him in long term.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to The Cobra For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:15 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy