[GT] Surge was discontinued in 2003

[dino7c]

Originally Posted by Slanter

Fan960 reporting that the official word from the NHL is that both Carolina players tagged up. Sounds like they got it right.

Lol they changed their excuse...it's not a dump in, canes have control before they "tag up"

10 second review when they look at other ones for 5 mins

[GirlySports]

Originally Posted by dieHARDflameZ

LOL Sportsnet not even playing the replay long enough to see McGinn supposedly tag up.

Sportsnet hates the Flames so this is no surprise.

[AustinL_NHL]

Originally Posted by direwolf

Lol @ people trying to defend the call.

I mean, it's the rules, and according to the rules, that play was indeed onside and a good goal.

So "Lol @ people who are too mad to admit they were wrong and that was indeed a good goal"

[Redrum]

I wasn't watching when it happened. They try to explain that it was onside in the intermission, but they never show the guy away from the puck tagging up, so I still don't know.

[Zarley]

Originally Posted by The Yen Man

Uh, I suggest you watch the actual slow mo replay and think again. He only tagged up after the puck was already brought in by the Canes guy.

The Canes guy doesn’t touch the puck again until McGinn has cleared the offside. Some of you guys need to brush up on the rule book.

[united]

Okay so they are indeed going with the cop out that he didn’t maintain possession across the blue line.

[GirlySports]

Originally Posted by RM14

It's not a dump in. He's possessing the puck across the line.

[OldSam]

NHL says the Flames player brought it in and that is why it is a goal. That is a lie. Even incompetent SN has video of Gauthier pushing the puck. Take the time to get it right. It makes them look stupid. Not an important game for the NHL I guess.

[The Yen Man]

That's BS. The guy had control of the puck. He pulled it back in against the wall. It's a blown call for sure. But hey, leagues gotta save face so of course they make up this bs. Whatever. We all know how competent that are at this.

[Cecil Terwilliger]

Originally Posted by dino7c

That isn't a dump in

Sure it is. He lightly dumps it in and doesn’t touch it again nor does he remove his foot from the neutral zone until after the middle of the ice guy also tags up.

It’s a good call.

And good thing I’m not coach because I would’ve caused a massive scene with sticks and water bottles and embarrassed myself.

[Harry Lime]

When has an off-side ever been called waiting until the puckcarrier touches the puck a second time? If the player has control of the puck, then it has always been considered off-side.

It's fine if they want to call it this way, but I expect that it will be called this way by every ref in the league going forward. Good luck with that.

[Duffalufagus]

Originally Posted by dino7c

That isn't a dump in

How far does the puck have to go to be a dump in? Wrong question anyway. He didn’t carry that puck in.

[rohara66]

Some of you need to read the rule book.


- Canes players chips the puck in. Does not touch it in the zone.

- Canes player at center ice is off side (delayed offside).
- Canes player at center ice tags up, Canes players on the boards still has his skate out of the zone and still hasn't touched the puck in the zone.
- Canes then go into the zone, steal the puck and score.
- Jankowski is breaking the zone looking for a breakaway pass.

[timbit]

Onside.

Both players tagged up before puck was touched by a Canes player in the Flames zone.

Good call.

[dissentowner]

Originally Posted by united

Okay so they are indeed going with the cop out that he didn’t maintain possession across the blue line.

Exactly, it isn't a dump in. It got away from him a bit, that happens on half the offside calls every game.

[GioforPM]

Originally Posted by RM14

This pic is after the offside.

[The Yen Man]

Originally Posted by Zarley

The Canes guy doesn’t touch the puck again until McGinn has cleared the offside. Some of you guys need to brush up on the rule book.

But it wasn't a freaking chip in. Some of you guys need to get some better glasses.

[darockwilder]

Originally Posted by showtime

You are wrong. Used time code to watch close shot and the wide. He was about a foot offside. It's not even close.

Are you working the game?

[Macindoc]

Originally Posted by AustinL_NHL

I don't understand why Flames fans are so mad/confused about why the first goal counted..

That's onside.

The puck was touched outside the blueline and then wasn't touched again inside the blueline until after McGinn got back onside.

Puck was brought in with control, not dumped in.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[keenan87]

Time for Tkachuk and Lindholm to show up