01-16-2019, 09:04 AM
|
#7161
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flamesgod
Not that difficult actually. Frolik would be easy to move. Neal would be tough to move. But it’s about priorities. Not that I want to move Backlund but I’m sure you could get a first for him in the offseason.
Could also move a D man if the young guys are deemed good enough to take on a bigger role.
Gaudreau Monahan Lindholm
Tkachuk Jankowski Stone
??? Bennett/Ryan ???
|
That is why I am pushing to move Brodie in the Brodie/Hamomic future thread.
Yikes to the center depth up there. At least we have 4 promising Dmen 22 and younger. We have very little at center ice
|
|
|
01-16-2019, 09:06 AM
|
#7162
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Van City - Main St.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame
Dreger tweeted that Florida may be moving pieces, and that depth defenseman Bogdan Kiselevich is available.
28 years old, left-hand shot, played for years in the KHL, cheap cap hit (under $1 million), and has 8 assists on the season. Also won gold with Russia at the Olympics last year.
Perhaps this is a guy the Flames look at for a depth defenseman?
|
I'd do this just to get a player named Bogdan.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Winsor_Pilates For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 09:06 AM
|
#7163
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Makarov
Yuck. No thank you.
|
Why? Is it Perron's 17 goals that rubs you the wrong way, or his 34 points? He's 30 which isn't ancient for the term of the deal, his cap hit is $4M, he shoots right.
Is it losing Jankowski? Sure, but you need to clear a C spot, you need to give value and Jankowski has but one year on his contract after this.
And if Perron sparks Neal it's a huge bonus.
|
|
|
01-16-2019, 09:11 AM
|
#7164
|
Acerbic Cyberbully
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
Why? Is it Perron's 17 goals that rubs you the wrong way, or his 34 points? He's 30 which isn't ancient for the term of the deal, his cap hit is $4M, he shoots right.
Is it losing Jankowski? Sure, but you need to clear a C spot, you need to give value and Jankowski has but one year on his contract after this.
And if Perron sparks Neal it's a huge bonus.
|
Why do the Flames need to clear a C-spot?
|
|
|
01-16-2019, 09:14 AM
|
#7165
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
Jankowski+ for Perron. Not a huge cap hit,chemistry with Neal, having a decent season. Blues aren't in great cap shape and look to be needing to rebuild again.
I'd rather it was Ryan because of age, but that's why the Blues wouldn't do it.
|
I don't like the idea of trading Janko for Perron.
Maybe something like our 1st and Stone for Perron and a 3rd.
|
|
|
01-16-2019, 09:15 AM
|
#7166
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen
Yeah, that's pretty much the point. I liked Bouma in 2014-2015, like we all did.
Well stats just don't back that up. Bennett replicated (or beat) Bouma's career season once. Four years ago. But I really don't care, because all I'm saying is that Bouma was good in 2014-2015. As far as bottom six players go, he was extremely well thought of. Just like Bennett is today.
I think we all knew what Bouma was at the time. Probably very few expected him to continue to produce at a 40 point pace because of his shooting percentage. You're acting like we couldn't evaluate at the time and there's been some great epiphany in retrospect. That's not the case, we saw Bouma as a bottom six guy who provided energy, came to play, was a warrior on the ice. Some crazy posters went so far as to allude to him being a potential core-type player. Like this here crazy guy:
Maybe if he didn't party so much he wouldn't have regressed, but at the time a lot of the same stuff we are saying about Bennett we were saying about Bouma. We just have short memories and remember him as the empty husk buyout he became. But I think you're selling his 2014-2015 season short if you don't think that many saw him as a very good bottom six player. I really don't think I'm insulting Bennett comparing the two. But I see Bennett providing the same type of energy, warrior type attributes that we were hoping to get from Bouma when the Flames signed him. It didn't work out for Bouma, sure, but I think the 2.2M (~2.5M inflated) is a good comparable for Bennett.
|
Ok I give.
I still honestly don't know what you're trying to accomplish here.
Just my rule, but I generally don't take the best possible outcome for one side of a comparison and compare it to the most recent or average of another.
|
|
|
01-16-2019, 09:17 AM
|
#7167
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Saskatoon
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01
That is why I am pushing to move Brodie in the Brodie/Hamomic future thread.
Yikes to the center depth up there. At least we have 4 promising Dmen 22 and younger. We have very little at center ice
|
I agree, but Stone is a game changer. I think Jankowski is gonna take a big step when we go deep into the playoffs.
If Jankowski faulters, can always move Lindholm to Centre
Last edited by flamesgod; 01-16-2019 at 09:19 AM.
|
|
|
01-16-2019, 09:21 AM
|
#7168
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
Why do the Flames need to clear a C-spot?
|
Dumb of me - you are correct. Perron is RW. Not sure it works roster-wise unless you move Bennett (nah) or really jumble things. They wouldn't want Frolik in their situation.
|
|
|
01-16-2019, 09:33 AM
|
#7169
|
First Line Centre
|
Flames should not be spending big assets.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Husky For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 09:33 AM
|
#7170
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
Why? Is it Perron's 17 goals that rubs you the wrong way, or his 34 points? He's 30 which isn't ancient for the term of the deal, his cap hit is $4M, he shoots right.
Is it losing Jankowski? Sure, but you need to clear a C spot, you need to give value and Jankowski has but one year on his contract after this.
And if Perron sparks Neal it's a huge bonus.
|
Not a fan of Perron, especially giving up Jankowski and more for him. The rest of the post has been addressed previously but just want to touch on the bolded part. Jankowski will still be an RFA so having one year left doesn't really matter all that much.
|
|
|
01-16-2019, 09:50 AM
|
#7171
|
Franchise Player
|
Perron has been benched several times this season, and a healthy scratch in a game before Christmas. I’d stay away
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Canada 02 For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 10:03 AM
|
#7172
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nelson
Bump.
I was thinking about this in relation to Hes’ conjecture that it would be Stone to Ottawa for a late pick. At first, I thought the circumstances were against it. Even if Bennett makes 2.5-3, I still don’t think the cap situation demands they trade Stone. More importantly, the team has been rumoured to be looking for depth on defence.
But “that should pull through in the next few days” would make sense if Stone were being dealt because Stone may need a few days to be cleared to play (Francis). Also, if they were acquiring a playable asset, why wait a few days? I suppose the other team might be wavering but then they don’t have the deal in place. Therefore, a pick coming back would make sense. It would also give the Flames’ cap flexibility as they could arguably fill Stone’s spot on the depth chart with a <$1M player.
I’ve always wanted the Flames to rid themselves of that contract (from the day it was signed) so I certainly wouldn’t mind if Hes was right!
|
It makes sense for the flames to make this deal! If the Flames aren’t willing to give up assets to try and get Mark Stone than why not assist Ottowa in getting him signed? Block any other team from making a move that could help put them over the edge!
Genius
|
|
|
01-16-2019, 10:23 AM
|
#7173
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Rumors and speculation from Friedman's 31 thoughts
https://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/...rade-deadline/
Dorion is meeting with Duchene's agent in person
Full court press is on to re-sign Stone.
Bonuses might become an issue
Oilers checked in on Zuccarelo.
Rangers would probably like a similar return as Grabner last season who netted a 2nd plus prospect.
Oilers will scour the market for young, preferably quick attackers, on longer term deals or time before UFA
Organization is split on whether to move Puljujarvi.
Some want to move him as he has value. Some want to stay patient and develop him.
Long list of teams interested in Ferland include Boston, Edmonton, Pitts, and Van
Pens GM wants a better fit than Brassard behind Crosby and Malkin
Jets, BJs, and SJ may be fits for Brassard.
Brassard didn't want to go to the Jets last year, but it shouldn't be a problem this year.
Ducks can fit in Silfverberg if he signs for less than $7 million, but it doesn't leave them with a a lot of cap flexibility
Ducks Pntus Aberg who is ted for 2nd on the team with 11 goals can't get into the line up anymore, he might be the next to be moved.
Dallas' Brett Ritchie in trade rumors.
Dallas also checking to see if anyone wants to take a chance on Nichushkin
Some teams wondered if the Flyers are still married to Patrick now that Hextall is gone, but Fletcher stood up fro him and recognizes big RHS centers are hard to find.
Panthers willing to move d-men Kiselevich and Pysyk
Unless a game changer falls into their laps, expect the Avs to be patient (i.e. not active at the deadline)
The race for the Western conference wild card spot might alter the "buyers market"
Some of the perceived sellers might sit a little longer to see if they can get in like St. Louis
There were rumors earlier in the season that Bouwmeester might end up on waivers
He has been playing better while struggling to recover from him surgery
Some team have watched him to see if he is a fit
Nick Jensen is a rental that doesn't get much attention but has quietly played well
Detroit needs to make a decision on him
Last edited by sureLoss; 01-16-2019 at 10:49 AM.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 10:31 AM
|
#7174
|
Fearmongerer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
Rumors and speculation from Friedman's 31 thoughts
https://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/...rade-deadline/
Dorion is meeting with Duchene's agent in person
Full court press is on to re-sign Stone.
Bonuses might become an issue
Oilers checked in on Zuccarelo.
Rangers would probably like a similar return as Grabner last season who netted a 2nd plus prospect.
Oilers will scour the market for young, preferably quick attackers, on longer term deals or time before UFA
Organization is split on whether to move Puljujarvi.
Some want to move him as he has value. Some want to stay patient and develop him.
Long list of teams interested in Ferland include Boston, Edmonton, Pitts, and Van
Pens GM wants a better fit than Brassard behind Crosby and Malkin
Jets, BJs, and SJ may be fits
Ducks can fit in Silfverberg if he signs for less than $7 million, but it doesn't leave them with a a lot of cap flexibility
Ducks Pntus Aberg who is ted for 2nd on the team with 11 goals can't get into the line up anymore, he might be the next to be moved.
Dallas' Brett Ritchie in trade rumors.
Dallas also checking to see if anyone wants to take a chance on Nichushkin
Some teams wondered if the Flyers are still married to Patrick now that Hextall is gone, but Fletcher stood up fro him and recognizes big RHS centers are hard to find.
Panthers willing to move d-men Kiselevich and Pysyk
Unless a game changer falls into their laps, expect the Avs to be patient (i.e. not active at the deadline)
The race for the Western conference wild card spot might alter the "buyers market"
Some of the perceived sellers might sit a little longer to see if they can get in like St. Louis
There were rumors earlier in the season that Bouwmeester might end up on waivers
He has been playing better while struggling to recover from him surgery
Some team have watched him to see if he is a fit
Nick Jensen is a rental that doesn't get much attention but has quietly played well
Detroit needs to make a decision on him
|
In what universe is this guy worth any where near 7 milion per?
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to transplant99 For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-16-2019, 10:33 AM
|
#7175
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99
In what universe is this guy worth any where near 7 milion per?

|
I agree though he's been a good PO performer (way above his regular season PPG) which maybe skews people's opinion.
|
|
|
01-16-2019, 10:37 AM
|
#7176
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
So maybe we should put Tkachuk on the fourth line the rest of the year then ... give him Hathaway and Ryan as linemates.
Sorry ... tongue in cheek, but you put what you think are your best players together and because of that they are what they are.
The Flames have four clear cut star forwards, a clear next best forward in Backlund and then a Frolik/Bennett toss up for the 6th guy. Because of that they both have time on the 2nd and 3rd lines and with that get a % of time with top players and a % of time without.
They are where they're meant to be or they wouldn't be there.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken
He's 9th on the flames forwards in ppg, in the last ~25 games. Hea scoring less than jankowski but playing a minute more per game, including on the PP. He just spent 25 games with a guy on pace to score 93 points. When he wasn't playing with that player he was in pace for 18 points.
It's the star player effect. Bennett has literally seen his offensive production double since playing with tkachuk.
Sure, with cap inflation maybe I'm off and he's a 2 million dollar player, but the flames don't have space for a 3 million dollar Bennett.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
So are you honestly thinking Bennett is the only player in the league that plays better when he gets more ice time and plays with better players?
|
I can see you are trying hard to hold onto this Bennett/frolik thing being a toss up, but it plainly isn't.
The fact is, if you think Bennett is worth 3 million per year because he scores at a 30 point pace playing with only one guy on the whole team, then you should be immediately disqualified from talking #### about draisaitl and his contract.
It doesn't matter if he plays 11 minutes or 15, he produces like a 4th liner. The only variable where he doesn't is with Tkachuk, so why on Earth would you pay him based on that?
Yes, if given better players and more ice, guys will produce more. But you don't DOUBLE your offensive output because you're playing 14:30 a night instead of 13:30. You double your offensive output when played with the second best playmaker on the team.
Bennett contract comparables are, IMO:
Nick Ritchie 1.6
Blake Coleman: 1.8
Tomas Nosek: 900k
Joel armia: 1.85
Matt Nieto: 1.975
Oskar sundqvist: 900k
Adam Erne; 800k
Jared McCann: 1.25
Frank vatrano: 900k
Drake caggiula: 1.5
And maybe Josh Anderson. At 1.85
All in the same tough age range and production.
Last edited by Flash Walken; 01-16-2019 at 10:40 AM.
|
|
|
01-16-2019, 10:45 AM
|
#7177
|
Franchise Player
|
I think the Flames will need to add some size and toughness as they will need it in a 7 games series against any of the Jets, Preds, Sharks or Knights.
Yes the game is trending towards speed and skill in the regular season, but in the playoffs, the game reverts back to a heavy game. The key is to have speed and skill AND size, that's the secret formula.
A guy like Brett Ritchie makes a lot of sense for a 4th line winger. He's big, can fight with some pretty tough customers and he's not a complete liability on the ice. He's probably a better player than Hathaway and also likely faster than a guy like Maroon.
I wouldn't trade much for him, a late round pick or a C prospect or maybe Czarnik is enough as the Stars might look for some more speed and skill.
You could rotate Ritchie, Mangiapane, and Hathaway in the two wing spots on the fourth line depending on the opposition or the play of the players.
Czarnik is somewhat redundant with Peter's preference to Mangiapane and also Dube and Phillips available.
__________________
Calgary Flames, PLEASE GO TO THE NET! AND SHOOT THE PUCK! GENERATING OFFENSE IS NOT DIFFICULT! SKATE HARD, SHOOT HARD, CRASH THE NET HARD!
|
|
|
01-16-2019, 10:48 AM
|
#7178
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 868904
I think the Flames will need to add some size and toughness as they will need it in a 7 games series against any of the Jets, Preds, Sharks or Knights.
Yes the game is trending towards speed and skill in the regular season, but in the playoffs, the game reverts back to a heavy game. The key is to have speed and skill AND size, that's the secret formula.
A guy like Brett Ritchie makes a lot of sense for a 4th line winger. He's big, can fight with some pretty tough customers and he's not a complete liability on the ice. He's probably a better player than Hathaway and also likely faster than a guy like Maroon.
I wouldn't trade much for him, a late round pick or a C prospect or maybe Czarnik is enough as the Stars might look for some more speed and skill.
You could rotate Ritchie, Mangiapane, and Hathaway in the two wing spots on the fourth line depending on the opposition or the play of the players.
Czarnik is somewhat redundant with Peter's preference to Mangiapane and also Dube and Phillips available.
|
There's also Lazar who is doing really well in Stockton. He's got size and speed anyway (let's see if this stint has given him NHL skill at all). The coach gushes about him (over Dube in fact). I don't mind Quine coming up again either.
|
|
|
01-16-2019, 10:57 AM
|
#7179
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99
In what universe is this guy worth any where near 7 milion per?

|
His own personal universe, likely including his Mom.
I'm not seeing anything close to it myself.
|
|
|
01-16-2019, 10:59 AM
|
#7180
|
First Line Centre
|
Two things:
on Bennett, the flames would be silly to move him, he is coming into his own physically, and the dumb penalties are basically gone. His shooting % is still horrible, needs to work on his shot all offseason IMO. Hopefully the flames offer him another "prove it" deal in the 2-3 mil range and lets see what he does.
the advanced stats show bennett and Frolike are basically interchangeable and game script and momentum or who is playing better should determine which one gets 2nd line and who is 3rd. Bennett is no longer a defensive liability and quite honestly when playoffs come and the flames need someone who is tough enough to fight whatever idiot dman goes after gaudreau's wrists (which is absolutely going to happen) you want Bennett in the lineup and ready to go.
In terms of trade targets for TDL:
Czarnik is going to disappear in the postseason, the guy is allergic to the boards in his own end, and Ryan likely won't be as effective either. I don't want the flames bringing in some other soft, small, skill guy who can't handle the added intensity and physicality because thats not how you win playoff series.
It's funny but I actually think that the perfect acquisition for the flames at the deadline would be Sam Bennett if we could find another one out there. closest thing available is Simmonds, or maybe a nick ritchie type if Ana would give him up.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:29 AM.
|
|