Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community
Old 06-15-2018, 11:28 AM   #14181
Geeoff
Franchise Player
 
Geeoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
A buyout of Brouwer is really only merited if that cap space is needed badly. Which in turn means that the Flames are serious about a high priced acquisition, since at the moment they have a fair bit of room. Otherwise you don't do the buyout, not matter where Brouwer fits in or out of the lineup.
It's not even about the cap space. I think the Flames are a better team with Brouwer off the roster. Cap space is just a bonus.
Geeoff is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Geeoff For This Useful Post:
Old 06-15-2018, 11:36 AM   #14182
Ozy_Flame

Posted the 6 millionth post!
 
Ozy_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geeoff View Post
It's not even about the cap space. I think the Flames are a better team with Brouwer off the roster. Cap space is just a bonus.
My general thought about buyouts is that you only do it if the team performs better without the player on the ice; the minute a team is paying a player to NOT play is when a buyout should be conducted. Does Brouwer qualify for that? It's too early to tell. He might fit in better with a coaching change, and in a more protected role. We also don't exactly have a definitive replacement for him on our weak RW, so that is an extra risk.

My thought is to not buy him out; save that for next year and if things get really bad, negotiate a trade if possible once the buyout window passes.
Ozy_Flame is offline  
Old 06-15-2018, 11:37 AM   #14183
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
So you are saying he shouldn't talk to the Flames then because we are in the exact same boat.
Honestly I've never approached Tavares to the Flames as even a remote possibility, so, yes.

Though personally I think the Flames are in a better spot than the Islanders.
Toonage is offline  
Old 06-15-2018, 11:50 AM   #14184
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
Nah, we're not.

The Flames were an 84 point team without Tavares, and with Monahan broken for half a season, plus no Tkachuk or Brodie for the last 3rd of the season.

The Isles were an 80 point team with Tavares.

Also, the Isles are losing two of their top 6 d to free agency, the Flames have all their D locked up. Plus the Flames have Smith signed, the Isles #1 goalie who started the most games for them and posted the best numbers out of their 3 goalies is also a UFA.
I disagree, I see very similar teams. Both have underachieved for years. We might be a a bit ahead of them but not by much and the post I quoted said a team that already has the pieces in place, we don't. At least the Islanders could bring in a Trotz or an AV to help push the notion they are geared up to win. Is our pitch going to be a head coach that has failed for four straight years as an NHL coach and then at the last Worlds as well? While we as Flames fans can try and be positive about Peters he does not exactly scream winning coach to a player who has his choice of where he wants to go.
dissentowner is offline  
Old 06-15-2018, 12:06 PM   #14185
Otto-matic
Franchise Player
 
Otto-matic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sector 7-G
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Tavares likes NY, so if they meet his price I don't see much of an issue. I think the hiring of Lou goes a long way to convincing him of any lack of stability in the org. I imagine Trotz might be a consideration as coach.
I don't see Trotz leaving a cushy Washington job for NYI IMO.

A real chance to repeat as cup champions over a pretty unstable team right now. Easy pick IMO.
Otto-matic is offline  
Old 06-15-2018, 12:08 PM   #14186
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
I disagree, I see very similar teams. Both have underachieved for years. We might be a a bit ahead of them but not by much and the post I quoted said a team that already has the pieces in place, we don't. At least the Islanders could bring in a Trotz or an AV to help push the notion they are geared up to win. Is our pitch going to be a head coach that has failed for four straight years as an NHL coach and then at the last Worlds as well? While we as Flames fans can try and be positive about Peters he does not exactly scream winning coach to a player who has his choice of where he wants to go.
I'm no "the Flames are a truly amazing franchise with a winning history" guy. Truthfully I'm fed up with this franchises garbage track record.

But you said they were in the "exact same boat" in the post I responded to. They are not. While the Flames are not lighting the world on fire, the Islanders have even been worse, which is saying something.
Roof-Daddy is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
Old 06-15-2018, 12:10 PM   #14187
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Otto-matic View Post
I don't see Trotz leaving a cushy Washington job for NYI IMO.



A real chance to repeat as cup champions over a pretty unstable team right now. Easy pick IMO.
I am still not even convinced that Trotz doesn’t walk away altogether and retire.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline  
Old 06-15-2018, 12:24 PM   #14188
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Otto-matic View Post
I don't see Trotz leaving a cushy Washington job for NYI IMO.

A real chance to repeat as cup champions over a pretty unstable team right now. Easy pick IMO.
Trotz doesn't want to come back to Washington. That's been pretty widely reported.
GioforPM is offline  
Old 06-15-2018, 12:25 PM   #14189
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Trotz doesn't want to come back to Washington. That's been pretty widely reported.
Does anyone know why? I'm curious.

Is it because it was rumored he was about one loss away from being canned this season?
Roof-Daddy is offline  
Old 06-15-2018, 12:27 PM   #14190
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
Does anyone know why? I'm curious.

Is it because it was rumored he was about one loss away from being canned this season?
I just heard from the supposed insider reporters on TV that he didn't like management (and they weren't keen on him either).

Now winning changes a lot but mostly from their perspective. He probably doesn't care as much.

ETA: probably a lot comes from the fact they didn't exercise the extension option after least year even though they won the Presidents trophy.
GioforPM is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Old 06-15-2018, 12:27 PM   #14191
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

contrary report however:

https://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/...ertain-future/
GioforPM is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Old 06-15-2018, 01:28 PM   #14192
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
Does anyone know why? I'm curious.

Is it because it was rumored he was about one loss away from being canned this season?
Word from Friedman this morning is Todd Reirden has been groomed by management as the successor to Trotz. And it sounded like there might be different camps in the organization - a Trotz camp and a Reirden camp.

Quote:
The likely number one issue: the status of associate coach Todd Reirden, who was promoted from an assistant coach two seasons ago. As part of that deal, the Capitals prevented Reirden from interviewing for any head coaching positions.

https://russianmachineneverbreaks.co...nd-in-the-way/
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to CliffFletcher For This Useful Post:
Old 06-15-2018, 02:17 PM   #14193
GoJetsGo
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Exp:
Default

The Isles are a train wreck defensively. Like, Oilers bad.
GoJetsGo is offline  
Old 06-15-2018, 02:29 PM   #14194
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
A buyout of Brouwer is really only merited if that cap space is needed badly. Which in turn means that the Flames are serious about a high priced acquisition, since at the moment they have a fair bit of room. Otherwise you don't do the buyout, not matter where Brouwer fits in or out of the lineup.
Not sure I totally agree there. Resentment may have built up from some players over Brouwer because GG played him at times when his play didn't warrant his ice time. Brouwer at 4.5 million playing half the time on the 4th line or as a healthy scratch is a distraction. And it can undermine his role as a veteran leader when his own teammates don't believe in his on ice abilities.

But most importantly management may decide that having Brouwer in the lineup merely holds back players like Lazar, Hathaway and Foo who bring much the same things Brouwer does at a fraction of the cost. If they really believe Lazar can be a great 3rd/4th line RW and Hathaway can be a good 4th line RW and Foo is close to being a 2nd/3rd line RW then where does Brouwer even fit in the lineup? He becomes a roadblock to the progression and ice time of your younger players.

I think there's several reasons besides using the immediate cap space that may mean Brouwer is bought it. I wouldn't bet on him being bought out but I think it's a solid possibility for the above reasons and the cap space reason.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline  
Old 06-15-2018, 02:34 PM   #14195
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Flames were better than the Islanders last season...now take their best player and put him on the Flames. Obviously Calgary with JT is miles ahead of the Islanders without him.
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline  
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
Old 06-15-2018, 03:23 PM   #14196
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
Not sure I totally agree there. Resentment may have built up from some players over Brouwer because GG played him at times when his play didn't warrant his ice time. Brouwer at 4.5 million playing half the time on the 4th line or as a healthy scratch is a distraction. And it can undermine his role as a veteran leader when his own teammates don't believe in his on ice abilities.

But most importantly management may decide that having Brouwer in the lineup merely holds back players like Lazar, Hathaway and Foo who bring much the same things Brouwer does at a fraction of the cost. If they really believe Lazar can be a great 3rd/4th line RW and Hathaway can be a good 4th line RW and Foo is close to being a 2nd/3rd line RW then where does Brouwer even fit in the lineup? He becomes a roadblock to the progression and ice time of your younger players.

I think there's several reasons besides using the immediate cap space that may mean Brouwer is bought it. I wouldn't bet on him being bought out but I think it's a solid possibility for the above reasons and the cap space reason.
IMO we overestimate this psychological stuff. But when it comes to that I think actual players respect seniority a lot more than fans. And they probably respect Brouwer's ring a fair bit too. And I don't think they look at salaries at all when thinking about ice time. And I don't think Bennett, for example, was jealous of Brouwer's (mainly) fourth line ice time, nor was Hathaway (who did far less than Brouwer with much better linemates).
GioforPM is offline  
Old 06-15-2018, 04:24 PM   #14197
VilleN
First Line Centre
 
VilleN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

https://twitter.com/kdotanderson/sta...487713792?s=21

Not sure if embedded properly, but looks like we won’t be drafting in the 1st.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Quote:
Can I offer you a nice egg in these trying times?
VilleN is offline  
Old 06-15-2018, 04:27 PM   #14198
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VilleN View Post
https://twitter.com/kdotanderson/sta...487713792?s=21

Not sure if embedded properly, but looks like we won’t be drafting in the 1st.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Probably for the better.

No point in weakening the roster to get a prospect that may or may not help us 3 or 4 years down the road.
Roof-Daddy is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
Old 06-15-2018, 04:30 PM   #14199
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VilleN View Post
https://twitter.com/kdotanderson/sta...487713792?s=21

Not sure if embedded properly, but looks like we won’t be drafting in the 1st.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not surprised, however the Flames need to find a way to get at least a 3rd round pick...

A second would be nice.
flambers is offline  
Old 06-15-2018, 04:34 PM   #14200
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VilleN View Post
https://twitter.com/kdotanderson/sta...487713792?s=21

Not sure if embedded properly, but looks like we won’t be drafting in the 1st.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Hardly a surprise, I can’t imagine a trade that was realistic where we would end up with a first.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
The Cobra is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:35 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy