01-06-2017, 11:23 PM
|
#1
|
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Flames 43 Canucks 13
|
|
|
|
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
|
badger89,
belsarius,
BloodFetish,
Brick,
Cheese,
ComixZone,
DeluxeMoustache,
Dion,
Gaskal,
GoFlamesGo89,
GreenHardHat,
Stillman16,
Vulcan,
Yrebmi
|
|
01-06-2017, 11:24 PM
|
#2
|
|
Acerbic Cyberbully
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
|
It was actually 46-13.
|
|
|
|
|
01-07-2017, 09:59 AM
|
#3
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Good write up. My thoughts exactly.
|
|
|
|
|
01-07-2017, 10:09 AM
|
#4
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Despite the shot count, I thought that the Flames were underwhelming. Too many shots from the perimeter, not enough traffic in front of Miller, and still a problem with turnovers.
|
|
|
|
|
01-07-2017, 12:38 PM
|
#5
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brick
Despite the shot count, I thought that the Flames were underwhelming. Too many shots from the perimeter, not enough traffic in front of Miller, and still a problem with turnovers.
|
I couldn't disagree more. When the goalie makes a save vs not, the chance always seems less dangerous. We had three times as many chances like the ones the Canucks scored on.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Street Pharmacist For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
01-07-2017, 01:04 PM
|
#6
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist
I couldn't disagree more. When the goalie makes a save vs not, the chance always seems less dangerous. We had three times as many chances like the ones the Canucks scored on.
|
I agree to disagree. Glen Gulutzan also mentioned that the Flames will need to play a more north south game in order to win tonight.
|
|
|
|
|
01-07-2017, 01:08 PM
|
#7
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Well, if they out-shoot them 46-13 again, I guarantee they'll win
|
|
|
|
|
01-07-2017, 02:25 PM
|
#8
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brick
Despite the shot count, I thought that the Flames were underwhelming. Too many shots from the perimeter, not enough traffic in front of Miller, and still a problem with turnovers.
|
I agree, the Flames easily out skilled the Canucks but they didn't intimidate them. I'm looking for big games from Ferland and Hathaway tonight.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Vulcan For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
01-07-2017, 02:29 PM
|
#9
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brick
I agree to disagree. Glen Gulutzan also mentioned that the Flames will need to play a more north south game in order to win tonight.
|
Exactly! Part of why the Backlund line is doing so well is the fact they keep it simple and shoot (accurately) a lot.
At least two other lines could learn from that.
Last edited by Badgers Nose; 01-07-2017 at 02:40 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Badgers Nose For This Useful Post:
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:23 PM.
|
|
