07-05-2016, 02:50 PM
|
#6661
|
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
|
Had lunch with a friend from NY. She is voting Trump because he "tells it like it is". Hillary does not get her vote for just being a woman.
Last edited by troutman; 07-05-2016 at 03:36 PM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to troutman For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-05-2016, 03:02 PM
|
#6662
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Victoria, BC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by afc wimbledon
No, the director is saying that an employee might get written up for it at work but that no one would get charged criminally
|
The two paragraphs preceding that one are pretty crafty...
Quote:
Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past.
In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here.
To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.
|
And... As far as the 'wilfulness', check this out
Quote:
The lawyers doing the sorting for Secretary Clinton in 2014 did not individually read the content of all of her e-mails, as we did for those available to us; instead, they relied on header information and used search terms to try to find all work-related e-mails among the reportedly more than 60,000 total e-mails remaining on Secretary Clinton’s personal system in 2014. It is highly likely their search terms missed some work-related e-mails, and that we later found them, for example, in the mailboxes of other officials or in the slack space of a server.
|
Apparently it is 'likely' that 30,000 emails were missed by Clinton's lawyers when they were asked to hand them over to investigators.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to HotHotHeat For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-05-2016, 03:05 PM
|
#6663
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman
Had lunch with a friend from NY. She is voting Trump because he "tells it like it is". Hillary does not get her vote only because she is a woman.
|
Sadly there is a very large chunk of the population who won't vote for someone because they are a woman. Not so shockingly it tends to be the same people who wouldn't vote for someone because they were black or gay. The world may just implode if a black lesbian was ever elected to congress (note: as far as I can tell only 18 openly gay people have elected to congress or the senate and none have been black).
Last edited by ernie; 07-05-2016 at 03:08 PM.
|
|
|
07-05-2016, 03:16 PM
|
#6664
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
|
Justice in a banana republic.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Flash Walken For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-05-2016, 03:21 PM
|
#6665
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Maryland State House, Annapolis
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman
Had lunch with a friend from NY. She is voting Trump because he "tells it like it is". Hillary does not get her vote only because she is a woman.
|
Cool, did you point out a President Trump with a GOP controlled House and Senate can destroy women's rights? Jesus Christ Americans get what they deserve if they act like ######s. Too bad it ####s the entire world to do it. But those people who vote for him for stupid ass reasons deserve the depression that comes with it. I just wish we all didn't get dragged down with them.
__________________
"Think I'm gonna be the scapegoat for the whole damn machine? Sheeee......."
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Senator Clay Davis For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-05-2016, 03:33 PM
|
#6666
|
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ernie
Sadly there is a very large chunk of the population who won't vote for someone because they are a woman. Not so shockingly it tends to be the same people who wouldn't vote for someone because they were black or gay. The world may just implode if a black lesbian was ever elected to congress (note: as far as I can tell only 18 openly gay people have elected to congress or the senate and none have been black).
|
I think my post was unclear - she is not snubbing Hillary because she is a woman. She was saying it is not enough for Hillary to earn her vote for just being a woman.
|
|
|
07-05-2016, 03:33 PM
|
#6667
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: east van
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HotHotHeat
The two paragraphs preceding that one are pretty crafty...
And... As far as the 'wilfulness', check this out
Apparently it is 'likely' that 30,000 emails were missed by Clinton's lawyers when they were asked to hand them over to investigators.
|
That's the great thing about lawyers, they provide a far degree of insulation, R13 at least.
|
|
|
07-05-2016, 03:35 PM
|
#6668
|
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Senator Clay Davis
Cool, did you point out a President Trump with a GOP controlled House and Senate can destroy women's rights? Jesus Christ Americans get what they deserve if they act like ######s. Too bad it ####s the entire world to do it. But those people who vote for him for stupid ass reasons deserve the depression that comes with it. I just wish we all didn't get dragged down with them.
|
She is a dear friend, so I didn't question her opinion. Like how Trump "tells it like it is" when close to 75% of everything he has said in the campaign has been shown to be false by fact checkers.
|
|
|
07-05-2016, 03:36 PM
|
#6669
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Senator Clay Davis
Cool, did you point out a President Trump with a GOP controlled House and Senate can destroy women's rights? .
|
HYPERBOLE ALERT
shades of 2006 when Harper was going to do the following
ban same sex marriage
outlaw abortion
bring Canada into the dark ages!
destroy the environment!
Trump gives liberals lots to disagree with yet somehow it still ends up in Hyperbole world.
|
|
|
07-05-2016, 03:45 PM
|
#6670
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Maryland State House, Annapolis
|
Dude Canada is not America. The official GOP platform is to oppose abortion and same-sex marriage. The CPC would be dead as a political party adopting those as official positions. The GOP continue to try and do it at the state level constantly, and only get stopped when the Supreme Court intervenes. You think Trump is vetoing GOP bills? Lol please. Canada is thankfully well into the 21st Century socially. The party Trump is running for is not.
__________________
"Think I'm gonna be the scapegoat for the whole damn machine? Sheeee......."
Last edited by Senator Clay Davis; 07-05-2016 at 03:47 PM.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Senator Clay Davis For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-05-2016, 03:58 PM
|
#6671
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Senator Clay Davis
Dude Canada is not America. The official GOP platform is to oppose abortion and same-sex marriage. The CPC would be dead as a political party adopting those as official positions. The GOP continue to try and do it at the state level constantly, and only get stopped when the Supreme Court intervenes. You think Trump is vetoing GOP bills? Lol please. Canada is thankfully well into the 21st Century socially. The party Trump is running for is not.
|
Highly doubt much changes on that front..sorry - pandering during an election to a small minority means nothing.
|
|
|
07-05-2016, 04:14 PM
|
#6672
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Maryland State House, Annapolis
|
You realize that with control of the House, Senate and White House the GOP can do whatever it wants right? Trump will be getting legislation on his desk to block or restrict those things without a doubt. Its not even up for debate, they will because its their official platform, and beyond that look at their actions on the matters which is to....restrict those things as much as possible. Keep thinking Trump is some renegade who will be fighting his own party the entire time. He only wants to win, not actually do #### as President. He'll be a nice puppet for them though, say big stupid things on TV to distract from what the GOP really wants to do.
__________________
"Think I'm gonna be the scapegoat for the whole damn machine? Sheeee......."
|
|
|
07-05-2016, 04:26 PM
|
#6673
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by afc wimbledon
No, the director is saying that an employee might get written up for it at work but that no one would get charged criminally
|
So they would get fired, and couldn't run for POTUS?
|
|
|
07-05-2016, 04:42 PM
|
#6674
|
Franchise Player
|
How is it that in Hillary's case ignorance of the law is in fact a defense? They've said several times that what she did was illegal if she had meant to do it. But she just f'ed it up so no charges required. I would be the king of that defense.
|
|
|
07-05-2016, 05:01 PM
|
#6675
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OMG!WTF!
How is it that in Hillary's case ignorance of the law is in fact a defense? They've said several times that what she did was illegal if she had meant to do it. But she just f'ed it up so no charges required. I would be the king of that defense.
|
Are you rich and powerful?
No?
There's your problem.
|
|
|
07-05-2016, 05:53 PM
|
#6676
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken
Are you rich and powerful?
No?
There's your problem.
|
Yes. Clearly you do not know who you are dealing with here. GUARDS!
|
|
|
07-05-2016, 06:12 PM
|
#6677
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: not lurking
|
I read a good point today that Trump's immediate response was wrong. His focus was on the system being rigged (despite the fact that a popular and respected Republican was at the center of it). Yet what he should be focusing on is the fact that Comey said that Hillary and her staff were essentially incompetent in this regard. An incompetence argument hits Clinton a lot harder (in one of her areas of strength) than the corruption and entitlement argument, which is really reaching the point of diminishing returns.
Meanwhile, at her campaign speech today, Clinton was largely in the background while Obama teed off on Trump. It's a clear and transparent bait to try and get Trump talking about anything other than the emails; will he take that bait and get into a war of words with Obama?
|
|
|
07-05-2016, 06:33 PM
|
#6678
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: east van
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by peter12
So they would get fired, and couldn't run for POTUS?
|
That would depend whether they Union or not.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to afc wimbledon For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-05-2016, 06:35 PM
|
#6679
|
NOT breaking news
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
|
Trump is on an angry rant right now
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire
|
|
|
07-05-2016, 06:43 PM
|
#6680
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
|
From Daniel Dale on Twitter:
Trump just accused Clinton of bribing Attorney General Loretta Lynch by offering through the NYT to extend her tenure. "It's a bribe!"
There is, of course, no evidence of this - or that Clinton was even connected to the vague, anonymously sourced NYT line
Trump falsely claims that countries that donate to the Clinton Foundation push gay people off buildings. That's ISIS.
Donald Trump just called Barack Obama a "phony president."
Trump said he's going to take the U.S. back from "these thieves and these crooks and these horrible presidents and these phony presidents."
Trump complains at length that President Obama says "ISIL" even though most people say "ISIS." He thinks Obama is trying to annoy people.
__________________
The Quest stands upon the edge of a knife. Stray but a little, and it will fail, to the ruin of all. Yet hope remains while the Company is true. Go Flames Go!
Pain heals. Chicks dig scars. Glory... lasts forever.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:17 AM.
|
|