|
View Poll Results: Which goalie would you be most happy with as our #1 next season, considering cost?
|
|
Bishop, Ben
|
   
|
167 |
36.95% |
|
Condon, Mike
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
|
Elliott, Brian
|
  
|
57 |
12.61% |
|
Fleury, Marc-Andre
|
  
|
78 |
17.26% |
|
Hutchinson, Michael
|
  
|
3 |
0.66% |
|
Mrazek, Petr
|
  
|
51 |
11.28% |
|
Ortio, Joni
|
|
10 |
2.21% |
|
Ramo, Karri
|
|
1 |
0.22% |
|
Reimer, James
|
|
85 |
18.81% |
05-17-2016, 05:07 AM
|
#81
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reggie Dunlop
Go big or go home.
Malcolm Subban anyone?
|
Perhaps with the Bruins undergoing a re-tooling, maybe Rask could be available.
Would make more sense for them than dealing Subban.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
|
|
|
|
05-17-2016, 05:19 AM
|
#82
|
|
Help, save, whatever.
|
I voted Reimer because he is a really good goalie who never got the credit he deserved in Toronto. Plus he is from the westcoast. If you guys do sign him he will quickly become a fan favourite. Plus I think it makes the most sense for the Flames as a team where you are at. You don't want to sign a Bishop because you aren't a true contender yet. But you want someone who can win you games and get you into the playoffs.
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2016, 06:52 AM
|
#83
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Not enough people are looking long term with there picks. This team needs a younger starter then we don't have to replace in 3-4 years.
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2016, 06:57 AM
|
#84
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Too bad we didn't trade Kris Russell, a 2nd rounder and miscellaneous garbage for Murray when we had the chance.
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2016, 07:22 AM
|
#86
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick M.
|
I don't believe that Gillies is going to bring back a big return as Cam Talbot had some very solid NHL experience under his belt and all he fetched was 2nd, 3rd, and 7th rounder. Most teams have a guy like him in their system and you will have to find a team that really, really likes him to get a decent return.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
05-17-2016, 07:25 AM
|
#87
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher
I'd be surprised if they trade either this summer. This summer isn't the pressure point and having both of them makes STL better contenders next year. Is the idea that they trade the goalie that helps them to the West finals or Stanley Cup less ridiculous than the idea of trading Allen? I think the idea that they trade Elliott this summer is equally if not more ridiculous.
|
Same with the Lightning and Bishop. These teams are at the peak of their Cup windows and it makes little sense to turn a team strength of goaltending depth into a weakness (one injury away from unknown) when you have two solid goaltenders under contract going into next season.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
05-17-2016, 08:02 AM
|
#88
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi
Too bad we didn't trade Kris Russell, a 2nd rounder and miscellaneous garbage for Murray when we had the chance.
|
I presume this should be green text. Murray was never available. Penguins came straight out and said they would not trade him. That's before he was even getting playing time on the big club.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to kyuss275 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
05-17-2016, 08:12 AM
|
#89
|
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: The Netherlands
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flamesfan55
Not enough people are looking long term with there picks. This team needs a younger starter then we don't have to replace in 3-4 years.
|
Maybe they're thinking Gillies succeeds their 3-4 year goalie which would be a part of long term thinking.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oil Stain
There is no pressure on the Oilers to improve quickly
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2016, 08:16 AM
|
#90
|
|
Scoring Winger
|
My first choice would be Frederik Andersen as well. I think he'd cost much less than Ben Bishop and he's much more likely to be available.
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2016, 08:24 AM
|
#91
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
Hiller/Ramo made 8M and if his demands are that high that means he had another season as a top 5 goalie
who wants that
|
Ya Hiller/Ramo made that when we had money to spare. Money is becoming increasingly tight. There also is the scenario where he leaves for nothing and the whole thing was pointless.
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2016, 08:47 AM
|
#92
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick M.
|
Until we see Gillies as a pro, we really can't be sure of what we have.
And the same is true for other teams. In other words, his trade value isn't exactly high right now.
The key with a prospect pool is patience. Let's let Gillies develop and see if he can become the starter many think he can be.
The Flames need a goalie. Right now. No question. But there are LOTS of them around. The Flames will get something done. Absolutely no need to trade one of our best young prospects, at a discount, to try and solve the problem.
That's how perpetual rebuilds are born.
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2016, 09:05 AM
|
#93
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flamesfan55
Not enough people are looking long term with there picks. This team needs a younger starter then we don't have to replace in 3-4 years.
|
But none of the younger guys who are likely to be available are proven starters. Projecting a goalie accustomed to playing 25-30 games a year as a starter is far from an exact science (see Bernier, Jonathan).
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2016, 09:06 AM
|
#94
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flamesfan55
Not enough people are looking long term with there picks. This team needs a younger starter then we don't have to replace in 3-4 years.
|
Isn't the plan to have Gillies in place in 3-4 years? That is what I believe will happen so I agree we shouldn't be looking too far down the road with a goalie
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2016, 09:10 AM
|
#95
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Look how long it has taken for Jake Allen to take the net in St. Louis. 4 years ago he was where Gillies is now and he still hasn't nailed down the starting goaltender role.
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2016, 09:12 AM
|
#96
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: F*** me. We're so f***ing good, you check the f***ing standings? Lets f***ing go! F***ing practice!
|
I watched a lot of Detroit this season. There is NO way that Detroit would move Mrazek.
That said if there is anyway you could acquire Petr, you do it without thinking twice.
Hes young and I totally believe will be a top 5 goalie in the NHL...but I'm 100% sure the Red Wings also believe that.
__________________
Backlund for Selke 2017 2018
Oilers suck.
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2016, 09:15 AM
|
#97
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Gillies has tons of potential, but in no way should Flames brass be pencilling him in as the starter at any time until he actually takes the job and runs with it.
Luckily, I highly doubt BT is doing that, which is why you heard rumours of him looking at Murray. I'm confident his plan A is to get a young starter who is further along and proven more than Gillies at this point. Will be hard to execute that plan though obviously. Hopefully Howard's garbage contract combined with Mrazek's UFA status will help him somehow achieve that goal.
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2016, 09:21 AM
|
#98
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick M.
|
Dumb article, but expect nothing less from flamesnation. Trade away your best goaltending prospect for, wait for it, another goaltending prospect. Gilles straight up is not going to get you a guy ready to start. Flames have to sweeten the pot. At that point you not addressing the need. If you want a goaltender to improve our goaltending depth, go out and get a goaltender. Don't trade a goaltender of similar potential for another goaltender of similar potential, even if they are a few months ahead in supposed progression. You only hurt the depth you are trying to build. This is the original "trade the boat for the box" gag.
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2016, 09:37 AM
|
#99
|
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: 0° latitude, 0° longitude
|
I dont know why everyone wants one of the most expensive goalies out there in this cap era, especially when he will be looking at a raise in a year. I would stay away from Bishop.
I would like Pickard and Reimer tandem, short of that I would like Fleury as an experienced starter if that fails
__________________
Let the Yutes play!
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2016, 11:47 AM
|
#100
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sunny California
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CsInMyBlood
I watched a lot of Detroit this season. There is NO way that Detroit would move Mrazek.
That said if there is anyway you could acquire Petr, you do it without thinking twice.
Hes young and I totally believe will be a top 5 goalie in the NHL...but I'm 100% sure the Red Wings also believe that.
|
If Treliving threatened an offersheet Detroit may be more willing to discuss a trade.
__________________
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:22 AM.
|
|
