Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community
Old 03-01-2016, 04:31 PM   #361
calumniate
Franchise Player
 
calumniate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: A small painted room
Exp:
Default

I think Tim Thomas peaked around 38 / 39, lol
calumniate is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to calumniate For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2016, 04:32 PM   #362
1qqaaz
Franchise Player
 
1qqaaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
Exp:
Default

Would you rather have Ortio + Backstrom or Enroth + Raanta?

Assuming they make no trades, which is doubtful.
1qqaaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2016, 04:35 PM   #363
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1qqaaz View Post
Would you rather have Ortio + Backstrom or Enroth + Raanta?

Assuming they make no trades, which is doubtful.
I'd Rather have a myriad of other goalies. Doesn't mean the organization is planning that way. Backstrom might be what many think he is, a cap swap leaning into retirement. But then again if the plan is to push Ortio's development further, then Backstrom/Ortio might be the way they go.

We will see.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2016, 11:22 PM   #364
CKPThunder
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

Can someone clarify a question I have concerning call ups? I have read here that the Flames are at the bare minimum in regards to forwards and defencemen, to allow them to call up players in case anyone gets hurt without using one of the 4 non emergency call ups. I believe Hathaway was called up after the trade deadline so wouldn't he be considered an emergency call up since without him the Flames would be unable to ice a full roster?

I keep reading in this thread that he has taken up one of the four call ups but I don't understand why because without him the Flames would only have 11 forwards.

Am I misunderstanding the situation here?
CKPThunder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2016, 11:43 PM   #365
Reggie Dunlop
All I can get
 
Reggie Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Could Backstrom be assigned to Stockton for a conditioning stint? It certainly would be a reasonable action.
__________________
Thank you for your attention to this matter!

Last edited by Reggie Dunlop; 03-01-2016 at 11:47 PM.
Reggie Dunlop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2016, 12:21 AM   #366
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
I still think Backstrom could be re-signed on a 1 year deal to better mentor Ortio. He's much more capable than Hiller and the current goalie coach.

I miss Malarchuk, he had a better read on this stable of goalies.
I get the idea that Malarchuk is not available for personal reasons. But I actually have a certain amount of confidence in Jordan Sigalet. He managed to fix the glaring flaws in Ramo's game and turn him into a reasonably average starter over the course of this season. It isn't the goalie coach's fault that Hiller is washed up, or that Ortio has been wildly inconsistent.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2016, 12:33 AM   #367
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1qqaaz View Post
Would you rather have Ortio + Backstrom or Enroth + Raanta?

Assuming they make no trades, which is doubtful.
Good question - and my best answer is 'it depends'.

How mcuh is Enroth and Raanta going to cost the Flames? I don't see either as being an answer long-term in the organization, but how much is it going to be to sign either one? How much term are they going to demand?

I don't mind the Flames playing Backstrom. I mean, I think they should start him at Minnesota, as that would be the classy thing to do. I don't mind if he gets in half the games with Ortio getting the other half, as it is a good way to audition him for a stop-gap. If he is terrible, you have your answer. If he does well, then I wouldn't mind signing him for a 1 year, lower dollar contract as a stop-gap IF the Flames are unable to find someone better.

If the Flames can't find someone suitable longer-term (at least 2-3 year until Gillies is pushing that goalie out), then a stop-gap will have to do until they can find someone or until someone else actually steps up within the organization.
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2016, 04:39 AM   #368
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CKPThunder View Post
Can someone clarify a question I have concerning call ups? I have read here that the Flames are at the bare minimum in regards to forwards and defencemen, to allow them to call up players in case anyone gets hurt without using one of the 4 non emergency call ups. I believe Hathaway was called up after the trade deadline so wouldn't he be considered an emergency call up since without him the Flames would be unable to ice a full roster?

I keep reading in this thread that he has taken up one of the four call ups but I don't understand why because without him the Flames would only have 11 forwards.

Am I misunderstanding the situation here?
You can't trade yourself into an Emergency situation.

When a player is on an Emergency Recall, you have to inform the League which unavailable roster player he is replacing. After trading away Granlund, Hudler, and Jones, the Flames only had 11 healthy forwards in Calgary, and no injured forwards, so there was no one for whom Hathaway could be designated as an Emergency replacement.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 03-02-2016, 05:32 AM   #369
devo22
Franchise Player
 
devo22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
Exp:
Default

Yup, Trelving explained it on the FAN. Said there has to be an injury for an emergency recall, and since the Flames didn't have any up front and created the 11 forwards situation themselves by trading Jones, it had to be one of the 4 regular recalls.
devo22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2016, 05:42 AM   #370
Geeoff
Franchise Player
 
Geeoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reggie Dunlop View Post
Could Backstrom be assigned to Stockton for a conditioning stint? It certainly would be a reasonable action.
He has a no movement clause, so he would have to agree to it.
Geeoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2016, 06:17 AM   #371
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Backstrom is a contract dump. They aren't going to keep him around after this year. The Flames will have two new goaltenders come next season and I wouldn't be shocked is one of them is a former Leaf.
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2016, 06:18 AM   #372
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

I'm starting to agree with the minority around here...if the flames had Jones last night, they would have won so convincingly that the league would have awarded them 50'points and they'd make the playoffs! Picks are garbage!!!!!
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2016, 07:19 AM   #373
underGRADFlame
Lives In Fear Of Labelling
 
underGRADFlame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969 View Post
I'm starting to agree with the minority around here...if the flames had Jones last night, they would have won so convincingly that the league would have awarded them 50'points and they'd make the playoffs! Picks are garbage!!!!!
For his unselfish act of friendship... 50 points to David Jones and the Calgary Flames.

underGRADFlame is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to underGRADFlame For This Useful Post:
Old 03-02-2016, 08:47 PM   #374
#-3
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Exp:
Default

I think you guys completely miss the point.

Jones for a 6th nothing special about that return, but I guess that's believable.
Taking on a teams crap contract just so you can help make another team better, pushes it over the edge, it was a bad deal.

I just think the culture is worth allot more than a 6th. Building a franchise that makes good deals, tries to win games, and just generally doesn't do the things Oilers do.

Frankly I'm pretty embarrassed by the number of Flames fans that are musing about the benefits of tanking. Have we not learned anything from laughing at that gong show up north for the last 7 years. It's not about the number of picks or how high they are. Its about scouting well, developing players properly, being honest and fair with your players and making smart business decisions.
#-3 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to #-3 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-02-2016, 08:51 PM   #375
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by #-3 View Post
Jones for a 6th nothing special about that return, but I guess that's believable.
Taking on a teams crap contract just so you can help make another team better, pushes it over the edge, it was a bad deal.
Fine. But that wasn't what they did. They took on the crap contract so that the trade would be possible. It was a salary cap move.

Dollars going in equalled dollars going out, and the Flames got a pick for a player that they were not going to re-sign and had no particular use for this season. Show me what they lost, and I'll agree it was a bad deal. But they lost nothing at all.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Jay Random For This Useful Post:
Old 03-02-2016, 08:57 PM   #376
killer_carlson
Franchise Player
 
killer_carlson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

I can see why Jones was so happy to leave. He's playing for his career right now.

he needs a high profile playoff run with some good games or else I think his NHL career is in jeopardy.

I hope he does well.
__________________
"OOOOOOHHHHHHH those Russians" - Boney M
killer_carlson is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to killer_carlson For This Useful Post:
Old 03-02-2016, 08:59 PM   #377
Samonadreau
Franchise Player
 
Samonadreau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Paradise
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random View Post
Fine. But that wasn't what they did. They took on the crap contract so that the trade would be possible. It was a salary cap move.

Dollars going in equalled dollars going out, and the Flames got a pick for a player that they were not going to re-sign and had no particular use for this season. Show me what they lost, and I'll agree it was a bad deal. But they lost nothing at all.
This. They get one more swing at the bat on draft day and clear a spot to play a deserving youngster ala Hathaway. The cap swap shows management and ownership are committed to growing the team. Great move.
Samonadreau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2016, 09:00 PM   #378
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by killer_carlson View Post
I can see why Jones was so happy to leave. He's playing for his career right now.

he needs a high profile playoff run with some good games or else I think his NHL career is in jeopardy.

I hope he does well.
Yup he looks to be in a Glencross situation right now.

Not a great year so far and his performance with Minnesota down the stretch might determine if he gets another contract offer at all. I would think he finds a home regardless, but I thought Glencross would have no problem either.
AC is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to AC For This Useful Post:
Old 03-02-2016, 09:00 PM   #379
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

I agree, we took their crap...but they took ours too! It was a bad player for bad player deal but they'll be able to play Jones and they couldn't play backstrom. The flames get a 6th and get rid of a guy who didn't want to be here.

Player going=crap
New player=crap
6th rounder=crap

We got the most crap, we win!
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Poe969 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-02-2016, 09:19 PM   #380
wingmaker
Powerplay Quarterback
 
wingmaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: the RR diner
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by #-3 View Post
I think you guys completely miss the point.

Jones for a 6th nothing special about that return, but I guess that's believable.
Taking on a teams crap contract just so you can help make another team better, pushes it over the edge, it was a bad deal.
I haven't followed this whole thread so I apologize if these points have been made already.

David Jones's salary is still more than Backstrom's, so the Flames still actually saved money on the deal. Not sure what the complaint could possibly be about that.

Furthermore, it was very clear that David Jones was not in the Flames plans. There had been no contract talks. You really think that a 30 something UFA with no chance of re-signing is going to make a difference in culture on a team near the bottom of the standings? By that reasoning, who's to say Backstrom doesn't come in and provide a breath of fresh air as a different voice in the room, especially to Ortio?
__________________
Harry, I'm gonna let you in on a little secret. Every day, once a day, give yourself a present. Don't plan it, don't wait for it, just... let it happen. Could be a new shirt at the men's store, a catnap in your office chair, or... two cups of good, hot, black coffee.
wingmaker is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to wingmaker For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:32 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy