06-30-2015, 03:20 PM
|
#41
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw
Not a bad return, but Saad is a great young player. They should have tried harder to get rid of Bickel/Sharp instead.
|
Looks like they were simply out of time. Other teams realized that and weren't looking to do Chicago any favours.
|
|
|
|
06-30-2015, 03:21 PM
|
#42
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
Unfortunately Flames were probably not really in this. Chicago likely wanted Saad in eastern conference
|
Which is unfortunate. Could you imagine if we added Saad to our 2nd line?
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2015, 03:21 PM
|
#43
|
|
Ass Handler
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Okotoks, AB
|
I cannot believe that Chicago traded Saad. Damn, how I wish the Flames were in on this one.
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2015, 03:21 PM
|
#44
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Anisimov isn't a bad piece either but is a UFA at end of next year and Hawks won't be able to afford him either.
Morin, and Tropp are throw in pieces.
In a couple years this could look bad if it's just Dano for Saad and Paliotta
Last edited by SuperMatt18; 06-30-2015 at 03:24 PM.
|
|
|
|
06-30-2015, 03:23 PM
|
#45
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kalispell, Montana
|
Dano is no joke. Good trade for both teams.
__________________
I am in love with Montana. For other states I have admiration, respect, recognition, even some affection, but with Montana it is love." - John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2015, 03:24 PM
|
#46
|
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
WOW
Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie
CHI traded Saad because he was looking for 6 yrs with AAV of $6.5M. May have been an offer sheet coming tomorrow from a team with those #s.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-30-2015, 03:24 PM
|
#47
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Yeah, Saad not worth that kind of $$
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2015, 03:25 PM
|
#48
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Well thats a darned good reason to make that trade. Sheesh.
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2015, 03:25 PM
|
#49
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
didn't chicago just get Morin back?
__________________
"Half the GM's in the league would trade their roster for our roster right now..." Kevin Lowe in 2013
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2015, 03:25 PM
|
#50
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18
Anisimov isn't a bad piece either but is a UFA at end of next year and Hawks won't be able to afford him either.
Morin, and Tropp are throw in pieces.
In a couple years this could look bad if it's just Dano for Saad and Paliotta
|
Depends... if its 1 more cup and conference final along the way?
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2015, 03:26 PM
|
#51
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
WOW
Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie
CHI traded Saad because he was looking for 6 yrs with AAV of $6.5M. May have been an offer sheet coming tomorrow from a team with those #s.
|
And how do rumours that he was looking for $4M come out? Pure lies?
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2015, 03:26 PM
|
#52
|
|
One of the Nine
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Space Sector 2814
|
If Saad gets 6.5 then Taraesenko is getting 9.
__________________
"In brightest day, in blackest night / No evil shall escape my sight / Let those who worship evil's might / Beware my power, Green Lantern's light!"
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2015, 03:26 PM
|
#53
|
|
Commie Referee
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Small town, B.C.
|
6.5? He's good, but not that good. Yet.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to KootenayFlamesFan For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-30-2015, 03:26 PM
|
#54
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
So this trade doesn't change his offer sheet availability does it?
Still possible Calgary could offer sheet him.
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2015, 03:26 PM
|
#55
|
|
Franchise Player
|
6.5 is steep. Love Saad but if your paying those kinds of dollars I'd prefer offer sheeting Tarasenko.
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2015, 03:27 PM
|
#56
|
|
Resident Videologist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
|
Can someone who knows give a quick ranking of the prospects involved? Hard to evaluate the trade when I'm not familiar with Paliotta or Broadhurst.
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2015, 03:27 PM
|
#57
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
|
I really hope he doesn't get $6.5, that would really screw up the Monahan/Gaudreau market IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2015, 03:29 PM
|
#58
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
That Kekelainen fellow is a heck of a GM. They draft amazingly and have made some savvy moves since he and Davidson rolled into town.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-30-2015, 03:30 PM
|
#59
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by H2SO4(aq)
So this trade doesn't change his offer sheet availability does it?
Still possible Calgary could offer sheet him.
|
No it doesn't, but Columbus has the cap space to match. Chicago doesn't.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2015, 03:30 PM
|
#60
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
That Kekelainen fellow is a heck of a GM. They draft amazingly and have made some savvy moves since he and Davidson rolled into town.
|
Ya definitely a good combo. I think we got a pretty solid combo ourselves though.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:36 AM.
|
|
