Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum

View Poll Results: What do you think the Avs will do?
Avs match, keep O'Reilly 178 35.89%
Avs don't match, take the picks 318 64.11%
Voters: 496. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-01-2013, 11:27 AM   #1401
Flash Walken
Lifetime Suspension
 
Flash Walken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phanuthier View Post
Academic curiosity #2: If CO doesn't match, ROR goes on waivers and is picked up... do the Flames still have to pay the $2.5M bonus?

And, does that $2.5M cap hit count against us, even if he doesn't play for the Flames?
The 2.5 is paid upon the contract taking effect. If they waited 7 days, that 2.5 million is due on that 7th day.

Colorado matching will have had to pay out the 2.5 immediately as far as I am aware.

Flames would've lost the 1st and 3rd, 2.5 million and the player.
Flash Walken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 11:27 AM   #1402
Miniac
#1 Goaltender
 
Miniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Perth Australia
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robo View Post
I'm normally not a praying man, but if you're up there, please save us Superman.
Grab a drink, its going to be a long day boys n girls.
Miniac is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Miniac For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2013, 11:28 AM   #1403
J epworth
Franchise Player
 
J epworth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

I checked the KHL game sheets, he wasn't on the Jan 21st game sheet, but alas, he did play 15 minutes on January 23rd, so that checks out as well.
J epworth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 11:28 AM   #1404
Phanuthier
Franchise Player
 
Phanuthier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken View Post
The 2.5 is paid upon the contract taking effect. If they waited 7 days, that 2.5 million is due on that 7th day.

Colorado matching will have had to pay out the 2.5 immediately as far as I am aware.

Flames would've lost the 1st and 3rd, 2.5 million and the player.
Damn, as if losing ROR, 1st and 3rd isn't enough.... the $2.5M is just a square kick in the balls.

Would we have to take the cap hit too?
__________________
"With a coach and a player, sometimes there's just so much respect there that it's boils over"
-Taylor Hall
Phanuthier is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Phanuthier For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2013, 11:28 AM   #1405
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

There are like 3 threads discussing this and I don't know which to use.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 11:29 AM   #1406
Cheerio
#1 Goaltender
 
Cheerio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Exp:
Default

Oh god we've become the 09 Oilers.
Cheerio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 11:29 AM   #1407
craig.caulks
Backup Goalie
 
craig.caulks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by afc wimbledon View Post
The kid signs you gotta pay him, not sure about the corralry question
That's a word that could only exist in Calgary.
craig.caulks is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to craig.caulks For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2013, 11:30 AM   #1408
Miniac
#1 Goaltender
 
Miniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Perth Australia
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken View Post
The 2.5 is paid upon the contract taking effect. If they waited 7 days, that 2.5 million is due on that 7th day.

Colorado matching will have had to pay out the 2.5 immediately as far as I am aware.

Flames would've lost the 1st and 3rd, 2.5 million and the player.
2.5mil nothing for the Calgary Flames & 1st and 3rd picks in the best draft in 15 years... no biggie!
Miniac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 11:30 AM   #1409
Fischy13
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Exp:
Default

How does Feaster put it all the time, they want intelligent players..... Maybe they should start with intelligent management....
Fischy13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 11:30 AM   #1410
Spinach
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Exp:
Default

What could Feaster say to fans by way of explanation?

"We had it on good authority the Colorado Avalanche would very likely match the offer. What I said about O'Reilly being a franchise player, was just bafflegab. Suffice it to say, we had our reasons for tendering the offer sheet."

Of course, he won't claim anything of the kind. But that's the only way he could justify such a clusterbuck of epic proportions.
Spinach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 11:31 AM   #1411
browna
Franchise Player
 
browna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HELPNEEDED View Post
Correct me if i'm wrong, but would'nt king be the legal responsible member here. He's a officer of the orginization over seeing keasters work.
The GM is the guy that King and the owners trust that the hockey operations side of things and the league's technicalities and legalities are correct before proceeding with anything.

Feaster (his lawyer being an ironic twist in this) is the head of that department, and his sign off on this to put it up the chain is the trust that those above him and have given him.

An absolute embarrasment, and debacle. Obscure rule or not, when you're going to stick your neck out with $10m and two draft picks on something as rare as an offer sheet, you better know everything you're doing.

There is 1% of me that makes me think that Feaster did Lacroix a favour here...the wording that the Avs GM said last night in his PC describing matching the offer (which Neil Smith ripped him for), now tied in with this news, almost makes it seem palatable that this was part of Colorado's strategy.
browna is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to browna For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2013, 11:34 AM   #1412
Huntingwhale
Franchise Player
 
Huntingwhale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

I think I've gone crazy from all the craziness the last 2 days. Nothing about this team fazes me anymore. I'm sitting here at my desk and don't know whether to lol or cry. But I choose to laugh about it. What else can I do? We have the ineptitude of the Isles and Oilers. Everyone is laughing at us. And the GM of Colorado literally saved our franchise from utter shame/disgrace. CAN'T WAIT TO SEE WHAT HAPPENS NEXT!!!
Huntingwhale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 11:36 AM   #1413
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default



Feaster should get fired so they can Hire Burke because he has super close ties to Getzlaf........

We did it with feaster a year before Richards became UFA. Why change now!
dammage79 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 11:38 AM   #1414
puckluck2
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Exp:
Default

Can we change the poll options now?

Avs match, keep O'Reilly

Avs don't match, take the picks and the Flames get embarrassed.

Should bingo be fired?
puckluck2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 11:44 AM   #1415
FAN
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cannon7 View Post
One potential benefit of this outcome is that the Flames forced the Avs' hand and made them pay O'Reilly what they didn't want to pay. Of course Feaster clearly thought O'Reily was a $5M player, but atleast now the Avs have to pony up. One of the perks of being a franchise rich with young talent is that you can let a guy like O'Reilly hold out. But Feaster forced the Avs to pay O'Reilly what he thought he was worth -- so I see it as a win-win for the Flames. Stil would have been an interesting acquisition had the Avs not matched, though. But atleast the Flames still have their first round pick.
How is it a win win except it increases the chances of Flames getting a higher pick in this and next year's draft?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Igster View Post
It's a technicality people that was missed. Feaster is not the only guy making decisions to do things like this.
It's a technicality that Feaster shouldn't have missed. Or he should have hired a capologist or someone to advise him. And please name an example of another "guy making decisions to do things like this."
FAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 11:44 AM   #1416
TheyCallMeBruce
Likes Cartoons
 
TheyCallMeBruce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Exp:
Default

I wonder if Columbus would have claimed ROR off the waiver, since they would have first dibs.
TheyCallMeBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 11:45 AM   #1417
mac_82
Powerplay Quarterback
 
mac_82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 403
Exp:
Default

Among competing hypotheses, the one that makes the fewest assumptions should be selected.

Feaster is an idiot.
mac_82 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 11:47 AM   #1418
calgARI
Not Jim Playfair
 
calgARI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheyCallMeBruce View Post
I wonder if Columbus would have claimed ROR off the waiver, since they would have first dibs.
Definitely they would have.
__________________
CORNELL
National Champions: 1967, 1970

CALGARY
Stanley Cup Champions: 1989
calgARI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 11:48 AM   #1419
puckluck2
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheyCallMeBruce View Post
I wonder if Columbus would have claimed ROR off the waiver, since they would have first dibs.
Highly doubt it. His contract isn't that great and the Jackets aren't about to spend $6.5 million a year on ROR.
puckluck2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 11:49 AM   #1420
mac_82
Powerplay Quarterback
 
mac_82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 403
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by puckluck2 View Post
Highly doubt it. His contract isn't that great and the Jackets aren't about to spend $6.5 million a year on ROR.
ROR + 3 x 1st round picks this year = instant rebuild for Columbus.
mac_82 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:28 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy